Last night I met a very interesting, a bit more sedate man after previous discussions know a little closer.
So I finally asked him why he - still very handsome, educated, witty especially, lifestyle, humorous, well protected and financially - because had remained unmarried. (The fact that he was not gay, was obvious.)
He told me that all the women with whom he had to do, had tried to educate him what he had never accepted and will never accept.
Another fine specimen Man, this is to ensure knew none.
Better a kneadable slacker, or no, as a man who keeps his course.
He did not mean to discrete demand out also that he already excludes anything, only that he was looking in any way (anymore), he had come to terms with the fact that he is perhaps nothing more to do here in this life, quite frankly, but no more half Plug stir to land anyway.
When I hear such things - by far not the first time! - I do not know whether to laugh or cry.
On the one hand I find the serene consequence of such admirable men, on the other hand, I wonder why there are now so many of them are.
The idea that a man is a man seems too many to have come since "educated" women lost entirely.
The main thing is he has money and does once and from then on every time the little asshole.
The main thing, woman has a dancing bear for presentations.
The main thing, he can go gaga.
The main thing - if at all what you want - women can bear children with an idiot.
Maybe my wife has formerly also only took me because she was sure to have an idiot found.
Or at least a sufficiently to Verblödenden.
But I put the case that it could be but have been different.
- Advertisement -
Tags: Super!
A woman is not really meant to educate the man - or somehow make up for lost time supposedly his parents. If she believes that she can not live with its quirks, she would have to think about the past. Should it develop in the course of the marriage various quirks, after which time runs sometimes have an effect, it can intervene - in the sense of common life - but nothing more.
The man is an adult, and it's his job, if necessary, to work on themselves, just as every person needs to do actually. Finally means to be an adult not a sudden standstill, neither life nor otherwise a development.
Everything else is uninteresting because educate - this is questionable - is a very stupid thing, especially in a union between two people who would actually be for something else there.
@ Inge
Thanks you for this understanding words.
I plucked me now some superfluous hair from the neck, sometimes when I hear less Worthy, brazenly threaten to buck and then try for once hinzukriegen a little nap.
That - the likely - woman thereto has so kindly respond, should be sufficient Schlummerlabsal me.
@ Inge
Before I really due.
I have just threatened my two sons that I would not let her unbearable quarreling with would take two crucial computer cables under my me difficult to entoberndes pillow in the late afternoon nap.
These are extremely hard training methods, but sometimes help only those.
Well, Your sons are children ...
Although men sometimes even - like children - but actually personally responsible if they have become as an adult. Grins.
Magnus, therefore, there is so many of them, because this narcissism narcissist is a disease of society.
Whether male or female, I find such people suck and can find nothing admirable because no matter how many times I now turn or turn.
If you live partnership, you are a part of himself. Everyone does. At the same time you win also. One gets commonality, security, a form of non-material security, love, care, etc.
The crux of the matter is that it must also take responsibility and no one wants. They want to have everything but give nothing.
So one could be hung with gold, I would not want him.
the bookmark
* Angry about such a pack :(
@ Bookmarks
Your words are m. E. fundamental right.
However, whether the person from whom I spoke, "as one" is, I do not know (yet).
Well, I am so looking through one of the variety. Was the quality of the trains allermeister interpersonal relationships seen through since my puberty. It just does not matter whether or friends.
Earlier it was just only the education of women, war, etc. due to naivety that golden weddings were celebrated. I see that my grandparents and my mother.
Today, people are free and unabhnägiger (emancipated) from each other.
Now the question is which is better? In my Menung's is freedom.
My mother gives me right (70). Luckily, but also sometimes to the chagrin own, I was there faster.
What the hell: everyone should live as he wants. I do not envy many in the prison of their relationships and sometimes just yet.
Cheers
@ Joe
Cheers.
Humorous seriousness and art to smile about yourself - especially the comment regarding the author of the basic education of "young" men..
@ CM Schreiner
With so much praise I will esorot.