With 'science' tagged articles

Widened theory

Monday 03 December 2012

"Wagner!"

"Yes, Professor?"

"We still do not get the desired results."

"But we have set all the parameters precisely so that it would finally have to fold. Shall we ... "

"No, Wagner. We are now faced with the choice. "

"What do you mean, sir?"

"Either we put the theory to a wider basis, which explains why we never get to celebrate our results as a breakthrough science in the sense that they brought us to the advanced knowledge that they HAD SO well be wrong, the correct results, Our experiments thus makes a key contribution to the discovery of general transcription phase theory represented. "

"Or?"

"We bury the theory as quietly as possible and quickly imagine a new one. What do you suggest? " (more ...)

Kosmospekulanten

Thursday, 05 July, 2012.

I beg your pardon precaution that I am from current occasion once again dedicate the Teilchenphysikerei because I just mental stability for missing to appreciate the super criminals around the ESM Treaty and the same reasonable.

So: what have we, as a layman, from tabloid the last days, the "Higgs boson" and the "dark matter" concerning?

The former was postulated forty years ago, because the whole of modern theoretical physics could not keep their buildings, were it not for this, otherwise would not explain why anything has mass.

Any sane scientist comes in the face of such a requirement, at least at some point to the idea that you could have completely the wrong track.

Well, it gets better, but maintain the same people who absolutely need this mass mediating particles in order to explain the known matter according to the model can that this only 5% of that total embrace, while the rest, yes, from a likewise never proven "Dark matter "must exist.

The latter was, I repeat it on purpose, also never been proven, but again hinzupostuliert so that the previous assumptions (to fit and so the measured rotational speed of galaxies in the picture) are justified somehow.

And, here "had" probably not the Holy Higgs bosons, but most likely a lot of other particles.

I might need to reintun in peace times: from 5% they know (according to their theory) nothing in particular, 95% of them suspect then still do this because otherwise, even if the critical Dazuvermutete would finally proven to 5%, still did not fit.

Since you have been thinking to still find a comparison of this kind.

I'll try it - after a small, Verschnaufeinschube - times. (more ...)

The Queen

Friday, September 16, 2011

One should know nothing of the queen of the sciences. None of her dress, nothing of its nature. The commanded the dark power.

Nietzsche metric

Thursday, August 26, 2010

Yesterday afternoon I read a little in Nietzsche's Zarathustra around, and again I was struck by the unique linguistic rhythm which embraces a since.

Safe: Here there is no simple, classic syllable, uplift and reduction scheme; but I am convinced that this recurring, however complex numerical relationships, just what the distribution of highly- and schwachtoniger syllables are concerned, are present.

Who knows something about programming and has an interest in the matter, I hereby invite a seriously be for joint research report in this direction with me.

While classic Italian Renaissance poet, Dante, Petrarch, Boccaccio (more ...)

The Gay Science

Sunday, January 10, 2010

In the meantime, we need to focus the questions related to climate swindler strongly in how they seek to wriggle out of.

"By the time we all died, the earth is devastating warmer! But we want the money for us, however, right now: we give it enough gas guaranteed against all deniers "!

Man

Wednesday, December 16, 2009

And another thing: man has settled from animals through art, not science.

Each monkey tried everything to get a banana and still considered Wherefore, as best he can but he is not even painted banana pictures just like that.

Only where it no longer follows the purposes, you will be human.

Incorrect result

Monday, May 18, 2009

It is in Hamburg at SPIEGEL loss to horrified: In a large survey test (comprising over 600,000 participants, so statistically watertight proof) for general education of students, there was a "dramatic difference" (also the title of the article) between the results of male and female respondents.

Although sport is also excluded and science were deliberately kept short so as not to discriminate against women already in advance (ie precautionary discrimination was the other way around operated deliberately), the MIRROR committee for selection of the questions was occupied gender parity, the men knew average about twenty percent more of the questions correctly to answer than the women.

If the gender mainstreaming obsessed SPIEGEL editors have loved it safe when inverted (as openly admitted expected) result, it was now in an almost desperate interpretation hole. (more ...)