Yesterday I spoke at length with one that does have reasons to pursue quite inexplicably in my view, to feel.
The "cui bono?" canvassing, he came forward to speak, that it probably just give people who delektierten out to torment others.
The course is well known to me.
There are even people who believe that there is (alien) beings that energy basically from the suffering of others survived.
I do not know if such a thing exists.
There is some evidence, however, at least to some extent for it.
When I look alone, not only since I run this blog, but for decades before that, some people are like crazy when I spit them in their pseudo-spiritual soup, indicated at least in this direction.
They are angry, threatening and waving. Sometimes they prate even seemingly less dangerous launched because they think that's elegant, just purposeful. Or do not want to expend a lot.
Most of them believe, from experience, fixed to a full reincarnation of the individual. Those who do not believe in it (or any other belief), so long as he does not do too clearly an idiot. If it is but natural to the effect, we identified him, the more one, the other less than a kind of enemy.
As though he were dessenthalben the worst.
I have the faith anyway never understood: How can the only way shaken, how can so easily go overboard all noble Liebheit goals, just because a non mitglaubt?
And since you told me I was too weak in faith.
Hopefully I'm already like so weak that I spared the exercise just described.
Even the differentiation that not to believe in something does not mean to exclude it slips regular way of their thinking ability.
Often they do not pull on Nietzsche (Osho and the others take it alone is not sufficient, it seems).
On whose work I will not presume interpretive me now truly.
But who, if not Nietzsche, each clearly warned against the faith?
Also said: "THE way, THE there is not!" -?
Yes, the Friedrich Gummelt them already hard in the stomach, the Spiris.
At Crowley they usually dare ran certainly not at the Class A documents anyway. Even "Little Essays Toward Truth" would be rather too much.
They gather around cheaper, "channeled" material, after all, the "original" and mostly English.
From somewhere in the ether kömmt since her higher consciousness, schwurbelischwurbela.
It is initiated and that the rind crashes, the enlightened buzz and buzz, there you hardly get on.
True spiritual development as it ever really possible in the expansion of perception prefers to play as not so important.
It is also rather afraid of work. Where it is easy to inflate the jaws, as men come naturally love to go. But longer and more accurate over and over again to deal seriously with an object, no, that does not bring the Spirispaß so right.
Confucius they dislike most. The spoke so often so clearly about the importance of lifelong learning is that they probably exactly is crucial to the cookie. Sooo much work! Lifelong! A really bad Unspiri. At some point there must be good times, with enlightenment.
Confucius knew, that's still evil, not even real magic degrees. He estimated his disciples indeed, but such a fuss he did not draw on. He encouraged each according to its kind.
Again lousy unspiri. Without rank or title but everything is nothing.
What have understood least of all the Spiris is that you have to claim his place ahead of themselves. Find him, recognize him stand for.
Clear judgment, clear speech. That's the first thing.
In Nietzsche and Confucius.
In Cervantes nor is added a special game.
I stay with my Unspiris.
