No, today I'm in a good mood to gebührlich pour the Freemasons and other secret societies a. The must wait. Even the psychiatrists and their drugs and devices.
Yes: It goes back to the issue of aphorisms.
That there is this strange text Zipfel, Textpfitzel at all, is already the least known or even relevant.
Why you want to know of this little Textteufelchen so little?
Are we approaching the time thing.
That no one knows exactly what is an aphorism, because it is not safe. This is self-explanatory.
That there would be no good aphorisms, because it can not be either.
It can not be because people who constantly novels of Mankell Olsen or read, or at least Grisham, do not have time for reading aphorisms.
And also people who prefer Schiller and Dostoijewski read: self would have enough time for that.
To some it may appear bleak; but only many.
The point is that aphorisms, good aphorisms, real aphorisms, always have something subversive in.
There is more question, because there would be solution.
Aphorisms can not just read, alswie a ne'er-do or Narcissus and Goldmund.
With eager pleasure and Magenstreicheln.
It takes longer to build up to it.
You have to ask yourself.
That was never too much in fashion.
You can Moliere (yes, the poor accent grave missing me just too stressful to even introduce) weglachen even Shakespeare: A good aphorism laughs you do not just go away.
Either you can ran the brain Kastl, or you can prefer.
That's why I love the aphorisms of Lichtenberg: Nietzsche and allzumal.
In a very deep sense of good aphorisms are the Chinese and my stratagems used.
Do I even have to explain this? Rhetorical question. No.
There are competitions in strokes seal ("Slam Poetry"), in comedy ("Comedy"), in each of the already naming ago - just not here - Anglo-Saxon besatztem nonsense.
How to's here probably already beschrub: I was already teutschlichst made that they were selling easier manure - the so worth something after all as fertilizer - because aphorisms.
It was at one of my most recent birthday, and the main protagonist of such prose was a real canteen today's variety, ie one who really understands what from selling in how this society.
Well, we just laugh.
This is best done.
Line.
So little, as we perceive even the genuine new novellas (these show a deep relationship, you realize my words: and I myself have not yet submitted a), we notice more often the corresponding aphorisms.
So it's not just the lack of receivers. The transmitters are not enough under power.
Yes, stupid, aphorisms that can not be planned.
They can not even looking.
In precisely the same in their Unaufgelöstheit enough not even necessarily a brainstorm.
The if comes, will be then also placed on the hip doubt or Dreifel or Wasweißichwasfel.
Then it gets, sometimes, a great aphorism.
Mostly, however, it is a long-held idea that so thickens.
And yet unfinished.
This is too much for the masses.
