I have again my thoughts about the set forth by Jon Rappoport made (German translation by me) destruction of logic. (For English speaking Jons original article directly here .)
Not only that, as he shows, an idea, an idea, a concept, therefore, sight unseen can be damn unchecked, because it originates from a disagreeable person: the matter goes further.
For example, have many animal rights activists and vegetarians, without even having personally insulted or attacked or invaded the stables ever a pig, must listen that Hitler had indeed been vegetarians.
Not only that, some was already insulted directly as a Nazi because Hitler as a vegetarian.
And: Can I now that I am not a vegetarian, possibly be a Nazi? (Why should this now be a stupid question?)
And: In fact, the National Socialists in 1933 passed the first animal protection law, campaigned for species conservation. Should we abolish welfare again why? As many types exterminate?
In the United States of "conservatives", also some "libertarians", often a line from German Natonalsozialismus drawn to animal and environmentalists ((see, so call themselves mostly) and those who do not undergo climate atrocity propaganda, only against nuclear power are or fracking, genetically modified seeds, etc.).
Should we then also against animal welfare be, for nuclear power, Monsanto maize, every day, eat three chips, to avoid being called a Nazi? (I am the way, none of it known, that would have been between 1933 and 1945 anyone except to the onset disaster of war, forced into Germany, to become a vegetarian. I do not even know of a great propaganda campaign, because of meat eating was "un-Aryan" . "un" or like it should have been but that, so I will of course correct this nachreichend here.)
Clear that environmentalists now - still crazy? Abuse supporter of Monsanto & Co called "Gennazis", people who reject climate alarmism, Al Gore & Co. as "Climate Nazis" -. (Monsanto has "national" not to do with the least, any more than the Klimakatastropheten On the contrary, international, it is hardly possible so far as they would if already -.. Although the appeal of something strange - as "Geninternazis" respectively "Air Inter Nazis" to . designate)
Clear (yes: CLEAR!) That the comparison of "climate deniers" (such as whether the presence of a climate-denying) with "Holocaust deniers" has been pulled and is often. (more ...)
