With 'art' tagged articles

Osho: Just decadent as UG Krishnamurti

Sunday, March 30, 2014

I am reading a little Osho. In Spanish. So I bit them back at least learn again.

Already on the first pages was clear to me where the fascination stirred his philosophy.

Alleged absolute freedom and self-determination.

A philosophy but that has no children, so they these as - front hires free - yet.

Ultimately, an individual monastery philosophy.

Socrates, as a shining example, let drank the hemlock, also could mention either staying in Athens, or go into exile.

This he did, not shrinking from death, not this lighthouse human freedom and self-determination.

Yes, without responsibility for children. So ultimately the transmission of life.

So, as well as Osho. (more ...)

Again, a church, a Crawl

Sunday, November 24, 2013

The whole esoteric and magical theories, of which I have heard, read, with whom I came in contact, have a hook.

I'm not talking about the notorious craving for the respective "spiritual" leaders who Geheimhalterei and Lügerei outward, the whole useless paraphernalia, the clamped crude Initatiationspraktiken and such more questionable.

No, it comes that everyone at all times very different "function" can, as specified by any doctrine. And so well that the respective "Master" rather no longer compete.

And no matter whether these masters only a shaman in the central African bush, or whether he was the Chief of Skull & Bones, Skull with Cochise in hand.

Learning is now times more valuable than praying and speechify.

Self to itself is stronger than any retreat.

Yes, I also had masters, as a stonemason and as a linguist.

But those were not magic Fritzen. They could their stuff.

There are other - for me - undoubtedly spiritual energy fields that our exact observation and description elude so far.

However, this also under the control of any wannabes, and may they have practiced so long and hard up halbbeinige whole phalanxes of their disciples for it.

Consider only the literary mind awareness of the works that are presented by this kind of people.

What we see since, typically?

First, an overload of texts with any relevant terms that never quite defined, thereby exalted above all, untouchable.

Then bad style. Insonderheit in the sense that not only the redundancy too much, but that also stands out besides the obvious Sultry Right, the omission of significant, at least in contexts substantial, striking.

Had I, for example, an Indian guru before the shotgun. A very untypical existentialist pessimism (UGKrishnamurti).

United recorded. Some good observation. He was not even a cult around himself.


Nowhere the art.

So again a loser. Ultimately, even a chatterbox.

I mean now that the question of the concept of art a kind of litmus test for every religion, philosophy, esoteric Assembly and so on.

Since all the fun with the whole Döns and listen to drivel that is very fast.

As it is, their true colors.

Since it is important to show what kind of person you are.

As soon debunked merely swollen breasts, Western postmodernism are eastern divan esque Metaästhetiken not long ohngeistig hand.

There were no priests, who built the magnificent Gothic domes, but these were stonemasons. Understood the obvious more of the golden ratio and other essential principles, as the Bible garbled Laber Sacks, awarded the contracts.

Bach's music is not Christian. No Japanese is because Christian Bach.

Otherwise: Although one God, but to a lot of Archangel, the Mother of God, djinn, devils, lots of irrelevant and somehow hinwiederum but very important accompanying rabble. Highly important. Ugh Deibel.

Yes, I did not see all this nonsense for a long time, so I might have to Speiben.

No wonder, when you look at the, reason that many gifted refuge in a rationalism that is not significantly better.

Now there is suddenly nothing more, except the already explicable.

Again, a church, a Crawl.

Perhaps the defining aliens are really reptilian.

That fit.

How to become a champion? (II)

Wednesday, November 20, 2013

I need some sleep, at least Resting, so now speak briefly to you.

If you make it, you will be able to leave a crystal out of your hands grow, as once the Kalle Wirsch the Augsburg Puppet Theatre.

Hardly anyone will understand.

Are you going to, most likely, can not repeat any.

You'll learn that sometimes you can do it most of the deepest dejection out, sometimes out of the freest happiness, sometimes from the almost bored equanimity.

You realize you always different.

There is no ideal work conditions.

Even the whisper only gates and seducer.

You can do. How does matter.

And: About Throw not real friends, because they you just do not understand you.

This is very likely to occur.

The greedy but, the example of you. Go out of their way. Binding only on them, if absolutely necessary.

Take your art with in your dreams.

Be you not be angry if you cherished a seemingly great idea suddenly appear stale.

You just may not be fully worked out. Then she returns again later. Or it was wrong from the plant. What you need is time. Your time. Trust yourself.

Be especially vigilant when suddenly but the money comes.

That you're not used to. Cant not thereat.

With the money, the women come. Cant of which only half wrong.

Always be approachable, but not recklessly.

If you close from you? Are you everyone's friend?

You are you.

Not Martere you, if just do not want a crystal out of your hands grow. You're not the one God. If you believe in one, it'll let that which can be forever.

Be gracious, but not too gracious, against those who do not understand you, resist the slanderers.

Be a master.

How to become a champion?

Wednesday, November 20, 2013

My God! What hopes are down a young artist!

Should they him, ever gifted to the more insistent, cast out?

Can you do that?

I came - to happiness? - Not in the fix to take care of a young artist, whom I knew to say something that seriously took me, at my council would have wanted, allzumal in the sense of that it my profession.

I imagine the case, but now times before.

The guy is 24, very talented, it is not lacking in ideas, his German already shows remarkable traits, he tinkers and makes and does one or the other piece can already flashed class.

He is convinced that he will make it.

Now there is the fundamental problem. The double.

What will you create?

Want to write well, do you want success, or do you want both?

"Of course I want both!"

Can you tell him now, should we tell him now that he had much more likely to succeed in the lower middle dimensions, because if he wanted to tackle the road to Parnassus seriously?

Should we tell him that he must be a well-behaved member of a Masonic lodge quickly to "count for something" in the next ten years, with some probability?

He is, at least biologically, already a man.

No: To the more he is good, the less one can save him.

It is clear to him that it might never be something with art. And not just in the sense of ability, but in that allzumal of success, and even just when it became the Can something.

One is different, so you lie. Unless you did not know better. But then you will not have asked.

"From when you are a champion?"

"A Master you are if thou canst alone assess your successful work. If it does for you no matter how much it respected by others. If you still look at the other judgments with interest, but they can no longer put off you. "

"And how does one become a master?"

"You practice yourself in your art itself, tirelessly, and you practice in that second art, that the judgment about your art. Of their own, merciless, relentless, independent judgment. "

You will see that your best attempts and early works are most reviled, second and third rate is however praised.

This is done in rare cases to you to confuse the senses: usually it's the lack of judgment of others.

But there are also wise critique. Your choice good critic is almost a third of art. Some entschlugen this largely, and went not bad with it.

And: Make all the other arts. Are you a poet, so talk to painters, with musicians, with actors, with sculptors, singers wrong actions. Because you do not jock off. Scot you better by other living poets from because of those.

It applies to every letter, every sound. Not only is too low, that it was not observed.

Look at your work again and again. Turn yourself not just go away. Spare you any embarrassment of knowing your defectiveness.

Surrender to drink any more than the women.

Well it is, if you learn a craft.

This sharpens the senses. The Practical is brought to life.

Convert hope in will and work.

Hope does not help you.

And, clearly: Study the works of the great master of your craft. Over and over again.

But: Look out also because accurate. Many a shine only in the other eyes and ears, often merely because they taught to the mass so.

And: Wage something. Not always, but again and again. Try your hand once zutraust to a thing that you not even to you. If it goes wrong, half goes wrong, which is quite likely, so look at it as a attempt at walking. Master do not fall from heaven.

Sometime you see a grain of sand or a tobacco crumbs, and it grows you from a new idea, perhaps a large, far-reaching.

Learn to pose ideas long in you.

Do not turn away from simply ugly, from evil. To be able to do great things, you have to grasp, know exactly that too.

It will tell you that you do not sollest. Option you should only see the beautiful. They tell you this, are fools or seducer.

And: Set also your abdominal brain in gear. Feel.

All I know for the time being not to tell you.

Tomorrow I might think of something else that I forgot in the rush.

From Überstrategeme

Sunday 03 November 2013

The 60th and the 61st stratagem are not yet fully worked out, so await their description and notice.

The absolute Überstrategem I therefore also not receiving the list, is the artistic creation.

It must not fear Gegenstrategem.

No stratagem is permanently resist the art.

Again and again, people will realize the work.

You can kill millions have against it: and it is and it is and it is.

From the new aristocrats

Thursday 09 May 2013

Also I was wondering if I really saw a way to avoid hell. Given the hypnotized masses.

Yes and no.

Yes, because I only believe in two things: the possibility of recovery and the ability to learn. (And therefore the quite really are not beliefs, because I've seen both, so therefore white.)

No, because I do not believe in hell. (Although I was already there as a child, but that was just my personal hell, not "hell".)

By now the asked me not otherworldly concept appealed, but hell on earth, in the sense that you can build a schmerzphongesteuerten (soon painful glasses controlled) world slave state, I say again: Yes, I see a way to avoid hell.

The path may seem to many burdensome, not be easy, but it is very simple: It's about those for self. Some call it identity. (more ...)

Naked blind fish

Tuesday, April 24, 2012

I repeat: there is for almost three generations no big new art more.

This applies to anyone who is not able to change it, but how much more those which have not even been aware of. Still did not do not worry about the implications of the possible fact. Never thought about why this might be so.

The art scene in this regard is still one of the blanksten blind fish.

Even old hands relativize everything. Earlier it was just different.

There are reasons why we do not have much more art for almost three generations.

The first task is to figure out it.

L'art pour l'artiste

Sunday, March 25, 2012

Art often arises only, only, only just right then, when the artist by creating his work, do not think about the rest of the world, but (almost) only to yourself.

He is a doctor himself by creating. The only doctor who can resist him the word poison the usurer and the connected mind screams to help their writers and the masses.

Meanwhile, he is angesichtig often helplessly, unless he helps himself. (more ...)

Copyright: The artist as a man

Wednesday, September 21, 2011

From current events, I find myself challenged to take the copyright issue again.

Anyone who is interested in this, I ask, especially this post also to look at, as I must repeat here, although some content, but not everything, and especially in the other, (partly) less emotional, expressive form.

The same applies to this product .

And of course the youngest , who has obviously still not made ​​any sufficiently clear what, what is at stake here for a dimension.

I'm getting started now times easily and quote the Dude estimated from the comment string to "policy-news.net steals Göllers Full Text" :

"Dude says:
September 21, 2011 at 01:05 (Edit)


In principle, I support the dissemination of good, sound objectively and correctly worded articles, reader comments, forum posts, etc. always, however, only in strict compliance with the basic rules, which actually naturally should give every respect and healthy, honorable sense.

So if the content worthwhile and rhetorical readable clear - with the author's name and direct link to the source, in full (or with the appropriate identification, so it is merely excerpts) - on other platforms gecopypasted (sorry)), this is absolutely to support my opinion, firstly because it saves time and energy, the z.Bsp. could be used for productive activism, and secondly counteracts the abundance of common, brainwashed Meinungsgeschwurbels, even if I can your items listed here in the article thoroughly comprehend and understand.

I admit offizielll here, I do this every now and then without being asked of all of your articles - and also some other things - but ALWAYS mention your (or the relevant) name, as well as a direct link to the article in your blog (or the corresponding source) just as I clearly characterizes "[...]", if I take only excerpts (Many people are too lazy to read all about long articles, but you know already;)).
If I should fail to do so in the future, I will keep myself understood it.

What there on the politics-news-diebesgesindel.nwo.com expires is the longer, the more ridiculous and should (and will!), So no quick apology received by you are also rewarded accordingly (I already buzzing to some creative ideas by the head;)) ".

This sounds at first quite good and reasonable and responsible.

But only at first (forgive me, dear Dude, I must for the sake of the thing will be clear).

Because it can, even if my - or any other - texts are correctly reproduced and linked if any personal or commercial interests associated with it (when is that?) When around it not only louder disgusting filth is, no pictures around it or even inside mounted be contrary to the intentions of the author, in short, if it just yet "best" for these runs, but its vital interests (including its motivation and self-esteem, but they are anyway no matter) fundamentally ignored.

Because if this, the often - as in my case - everything anyway free will to power (otherwise there is still no rational argument), his work gets not even honored by the fact that he naming plus linking one to the reader interesting appearing contribution also necessary accesses draws on his side, he hereby perhaps can at least achieve some advertising revenue, increase its reach, so that its classification at stores like alexa and google, perhaps even draw a paid writing or teaching on land, while, conversely, the thief that specific page appreciates, so that fact for themselves and achieved them: then and therefore stops any fun.

Even in that rare, almost hypothetical "best" case.

And the argument that it is so time consuming to quote properly or set the beginning of the text for further reading, in my view is not only unacceptable but downright outrageous.

There must of arms, usually so busy (with what? With moneymaking? With any actions for any requiring other or different?) Illegal Kopist, of the arms, but actually maybe a minute (be it a go two or?) Tuned to give his high holiness more , for a text that he considers worth spreading.

This can of course as an author to write his text in tenths of a second, all he had to learn to can this, has collected in seconds of his life, of course not expect.

He must also live on nothing yes. And his children certainly not. (more ...)

About the Art for Freedom

Sunday, 03 July 2011

Without any Arg go to bed: high art.

Without Arg stand up: freedom.

L'Art pour L'Art?

Thursday, May 26, 2011

Art for art's sake?

The concept is utter nonsense.

You can even create any real art for art's sake.

For that reason alone, because it does not exist "art" as an independent entity.

Anyone who wants to create art that will create a work.

And work comes from work.

And in a double sense: Something is knitted on it am working. (more ...)


Monday, December 06, 2010

The art overcomes all guile.

The art of non-submission

Thursday 02 September 2010

Unfortunately I have to go no time and actually no desire to demonstrate, because it makes you feel slightly redundant and stupid, even ridiculous.

But this time it really worth while.

Since the arts and freedom of expression in the context of Islam in Germany is inwischen de facto abolished, criticism or satire can be life-threatening not only, but are probably on top of that prosecution, action is called for.

So here's an unusual, but logical and consistent idea for the brave. (more ...)


Tuesday, August 10, 2010

Our house is sufficient market

We hire at stimulating

As we know all doubt

Be replaced by our name

Iron rule prevails in the heart of the home

German wearing our witnesses

Spirit makes knowledge work

Art grows

Loud laughter triggers the juggler lie

As stands

In our nation Bergen resounds


(The authors of the editorial are known.)

Aphorisms 100

Thursday 08 April 2010

In the covert war the trick is not to recognize the invisible enemy, but to meet those behind it directly.


Wednesday, December 16, 2009

And another thing: The man has settled from animals through art, not science.

Each monkey tried everything to get a banana and still considered Wherefore, as best he can: but he does not even painted banana pictures just like that.

Only where it no longer follows the purpose, you will be human.