With 'Knabenverstümmlungserlaubnisgesetz' tagged articles

"From the foreskin of the member"

Monday, December 31, 2012

Somehow I had the feeling the last few days, again to say something to Knabenverstümmlungserlaubnisgesetz this year.

Now is a green parliamentary candidate in the end because it was written by a poem which, although stylistically not necessarily upper class content but irrefutable hits the spot.

So it begins:

"Sharpen the knife, singing a song,
From the foreskin of the limb.
Children can not defend themselves,
therefore they must honor us. "

And ends (you can find the whole poem here ):

"Are you for an intact limb,
so you're the same anti-Semite. "

So much freedom of expression, even hardly be denied in her testimony, may a party do-gooder who prefer beetle protects the children, of course not let go.

One can ask how a man with his own opinion and compassion for children could ever get lost in this hypocritical slime Schlecker store actually only.

After all, Mr. Dark is now known overnight as poets in the whole country.

But of the poetic side, he must have still a lot to learn, so it is something with the new career. (more ...)

Circumcision consistently

Thursday, October 11, 2012

Consequently, belonged to every male MPs who vote for the announced Knabenverstümmlungserlaubnisgesetz and everything dranhat, so afterwards without being asked - a child's welfare, it is indeed most certainly not - as betäubungslos circumcised public, then, so that the whole electorate can see him as he still whimpers of that citizen determined by lot, like that, licked his still bleeding residual part.

It's in the democracy next to the justice also about transparency.

Or? (more ...)

1631d equals 16 times 31 times stupid

Thursday 04 October 2012

16 times 31 is the 496th

In the Bundestag sitting 598 plus x (overhang seats) MPs.

It is likely therefore, as not all agreed with the call for a Knabenverstümmlungserlaubnisgesetz, the Kabbalistic encryption not bad go.

Circumcision of boys: SchnippSchnapp, Basic Law from

Thursday 04 October 2012

What is most remarkable in the last few days, since the so-called "issues paper" of the Federal Ministry of Justice "submitted" was now the concrete design of the boy mutilation permission law is that there is still neither the first nor the second paper of the public present. (Anyone who has managed to get one of the two or even both abzuschakalen somehow, let the corresponding set here or provide a link.)

Several major media have declared in the first as in the second case, that were available to them fully the relevant texts, but - as long as I tortured my engine in any direction, I found her not - always quoted if it represented some passages. Famos.

The Central Councils of Sowiesos, other organizations and institutions have manifestly full papers.

Only the common German Goofy Michel may what already could examine hundreds of privileged people still do not see the whole. (The Justice Department refused to give me as zeitgeist-journalist, to send the complete benchmark paper.) (more ...)

Circumcision of boys: What is still "normal"?

Saturday, September 22, 2012

I've been thinking for some time whether I should the following, especially the core set, write down here, should.

Frank Schirrmacher me then but by his just from me on the subject commented "acceptance speech" convinced to do it.

By yesterday evening - before knowledge of Schirrmacher's speech - again discussed the impossibility of one - for several reasons - to cobble together even remotely viable, grundgesetz compliant Knabenverstümmlungserlaubnisgesetz, I had eingebacht that I like to be at the Federal Ministry of Justice mice when the corresponding legal experts have, finally, begun in the umpteenth debate is no longer just the coffee, but even when cognac, mutually insulting as jerks, etc., was also arisen that I recently explained here, to want to make on the subject of circumcision satire , not only because many no longer funny could find, placed my counterpart Tucholsky into play, who said satire should everything, so why not ?, the ramifications of the Cologne judgment discussed again, the other finally said, "Maybe yes one sitting large part of the brain in the foreskin, and they must therefore from. " (more ...)

Writes Frank Schirrmacher (FAZ) right story?

Saturday, September 22, 2012

Frank Schirrmacher, publisher of the FAZ, the Josef Neuberger Medal of the Jewish community in Dusseldorf been awarded, in his speech of thanks tried remarkable to say what is it partly succeeded.

Following "double the pain" the title it goes in the sub-heading on faz.net equally powerful to the point:

"What is inversion? When a Nobel Prize winner, the Jews declared a danger. When the German Justice accuses the Jews injury. "

Schirrmacher then speaks at length about Jews he knew and knows, explained on the basis of literary and historical references, the rhetorical figure of inversion or reversal, this looks especially in the anti-Jewish sense everywhere, Günter Grass gets for his infamous israel critical poem in the spring, giving him deserves his opinion for as a perfidious Oberverdreher what I do not want to further discuss here, then comes really inverse to the point.

It was, he writes (thus the inversion of subheading regarding German Justice, Jews and Körperverletztung of accuracy,):

"Inversion when a millennia-old practices like circumcision German courts than in 2012" injury "is sentenced and in Germany a debate begins, the" brings Judaism "and" personal injury "in a legal and semantic context that makes one speechless in which Jewish parents allegedly hurt their own sons, where it had one but passed only once, when the judiciary, which now feels responsible for millennia, had then felt responsible only for twelve years, as German and their helpers not only bodily operated on Jews, but murder and manslaughter. "

Again the core: "... in the Jewish parents allegedly hurt their own sons ..."

Aha. (more ...)