With 'Harro von Senger' tagged articles

Weighings to the (Chinese and Mine) stratagems

Sunday, November 10, 2013

I will continue to work with security at the stratagems - have only yesterday night again developed one - but at least provisionally publish any more.

The response to date has been close to zero: Since I make myself rather then alone it.

Also, I like still have one or the other stratagem to use is not required, and I would be stupid, the effect only to give me.

No, these things I deliver - at least for now - no longer free.

I assume that at least a few people have recognized the weight of this work. Since I like to fool me, of course.

Spun out the idea nevertheless, I do not see a however, why they should participate in it without returning me only one word to it.

No, I am neither disappointed nor even insulted. I am philosopher enough that the former as the latter more to me straight away.

All my announcements in the direction that I wanted cooperation have so far died away into nothingness.

This can hardly be due to the overall quality of my minden considerations. This may partly arguably be some half-baked. I have never claimed otherwise. Some arose quite spontaneously would be to revise, improve along honest, intelligent criticism.

What you just read is an application of different stratagems in fact.

Since likes to laugh, who at least can, it is still home verwagt.

I have noticed just in time, so I will not tell the world first, which is why I think the NSA Chief Alexander an idiot.

This bandit club to create what times myself. And the rest sometimes put his brain Kastl in motion. This is both educational offer as well, at least from my point of view, strategically.

It is this decision in fact - for parts - a new stratagem based. I know it already. Meanwhile, it is also formulated.

My thanks here yet again China and conditions of the outstanding Harro von Senger, who I neither Mandarin nor Cantonese can give me, the issue brought near.

German stratagems?

Tuesday 06 August 2013

When scribing of stratagems, which the traditional 36 Chinese Stratagems (possibly) go (appreciated wonderfully by Harro von Senger), not in the sense that it would be sub-aspects already described stratagems, but evenly matched own stratagems is, I noticed that the former as be viewed as a closed canon, it seems hardly unheard of for them, so probably present from her basic ideas into three or four Chinese characters, would be extended.

Now I have to be honest I have not yet bothered to match exactly to what extent my stratagems no. No. 37 to. Than 50 at least half of plagiarism, as can not be viewed by non-comparable fundamental nature or are criticized.

The topic has me simply so interested that the question of other stratagems revealed. And I wanted to. Proposals by posing 36 stratagems as such, as well as thinking about how the question of other stratagems of comparable magnitude, for as many

I do not see why we should not even learn from the Chinese and build on it.

I will not hesitate therefore to provide further stratagems in their tradition, they may now be over here or over there as arrived or found interesting in themselves, or not.

All right, when it then, except by reason of their facility-wise, namely, that three or four basic terms must fulfill, no Chinese stratagems, but rather German. And they are, of respect for the existing 36 Chinese sake, they all also inspired, initially from no. Indicated 37.

One only has to keep in mind that the 36 Chinese stratagems total of slightly less (there are a couple of three characters, now I do not count after) than 4 times 36, so there are less than 144 characters, around which all epochs entwines Chinese intellectual history.

Unfortunately, I can not speak Chinese, so that I could dub my stratagems as a rule by means of four characters; but makes a Chinese German literature student who not only come here for bean-counting, with me in mind, so this may indeed be achieved easily. If you load me with free flight to Beijing, I'm sure.

Brought so much wisdom in less than 144 characters to 36 characters mind! Oh man!

Because people write books, others learn by heart mass religious garbage, and here, here, a few sentences, real life!