On faz.net again a good, even authored with Verve article, this time for mobile phone surveillance by Constanze Kurz. (Lately even occurred to me to suspect that more frequently than before adjusting deliberately in this sense reader binding, ruffördernde posts as they appear just at the competition barely, and if so, not in quality. It's not like that the people of the FAZ could not properly write to or want it. - apart times from a mostly clean-compliance with formal style -. not too often)
The author concludes her piece for so hearty;
"Particularly striking is in parliamentary hearings, when the subject of radio cells query comes up with the reasoning of the prosecutors. Here is regularly not called about a specific legal basis for the far-reaching measure or discuss a legal clarification, certainly not with independent control.
Instead, it is simply required confidence that the police would already be sensitive and efficient with great determination lobe. In view of known affected numbers in Dresden, Berlin and elsewhere seems this demand for confidence in how the slogans of the banks when they sold toxic waste mortgage bonds and real estate funds corroded to unsuspecting retail investors. "
Oha! - Legislative and executive branches are made with respect to whether their conduct electronic surveillance in the explicit comparison with the gamblers banks that knock out still more from any debt madness for themselves or their large clientele. Where it goes, until the bankruptcy.
Constanze Kurz makes every Lesfähigen clear (it does not say so directly, but clear enough) that only a fool who still do not understand what's going on, his cell phone takes you on a demo that irgendwaws to do with politics could have, in a cool club where might traded in drugs (in which not?) to a tryst, to the neighborhood, if there is a riot hip, actually everywhere, where something was, is, or would like to develop.
I take my time as a concrete example. (more ...)
