With 'drones' tagged articles

From drones and catch of the drones racists

Sunday 02 March 2014

I just wonder when the first precedents will come.

How close, in what amount, a private drone of a police station or barracks may come up that they can be shot down, condemned the invisible helmsman?

How close can a drone come to me, how deep fly over my garden until I can make it in the first case, since they film me without permission, photograph, could overhear, even threaten me alive, safely harmless, the latter perhaps only display report against unknown?

Do I have to call three times loudly, she wants to fuck off, until that I may resort to the trouble?

And if the drone has a speaker, is painted accordingly, says she is from the police or from the "constitutional protection", I have to believe her then, in accordance with the presumption of innocence?

From what I can defend myself against such a beast?

Cars drive also only meters past me, perhaps only half a meter, so I can bring them but no steel cables under the wheels, so the fun fly and the mobile stranded quickly.

Can I only set against a drone for defense if it has wantonly torn me an earlobe? (more ...)

From the upper terrorists Obama and how "it" yet and is otherwise

Friday 08 February 2013

Under the title " rubber-License to Kill "reported the FAZ Matthias Rueb from Washington on the world's largest terrorists. Drone upper Terrorist Obama. Without, however, to say, otherwise he did not write yes at this venerable newspaper. But still plugged latent criticism in the article.

Has long been known that the Nobel Peace Prize President Obama can kill by Gusto world, are doing next to suspects regularly masse wholly innocent men, women and children, torn and mutilated.

No terrorist group can, at least since the unexplained events to 9.11, boast of having carried so many innocents by terrorist attacks to the afterlife, as Barack Hussein Obama.

No peer but not Angela, certainly not Geert or Henryk says something about it. Obama is rather "Change".

Said, apart from the adjective "sweet", not even is quite wrong.

He is small change, change money, play money. He did not make it, so it was just Romney, Kerry, Petraeus (the latter has disqualified amorous unfortunately for this noble task) or else an ordered butcher gossips.

There is still no law against it, any written, but everyone knows that this one may not say what objectively, added in many ways by the criminals themselves: is what it is.

Like as if a bell shit about all the politicians, journalists, all that some still want to belong, would be placed. And that is much more important, seen of power politics, because that abmurkst a few possible enemy villains and many innocent people. This means mental control. Fair is foul, and foul is fair.

Orwell was the 1984th We have departed. (more ...)