Just landed one of the world's largest search engine by me about the combination
"Nsa Germany fuck nsa"
on the article
I hope that he likes it here.
(I greet you cordially. They understand something obviously intelligent world of network use.)
Just landed one of the world's largest search engine by me about the combination
"Nsa Germany fuck nsa"
on the article
I hope that he likes it here.
(I greet you cordially. They understand something obviously intelligent world of network use.)
Yesterday a person who calls himself "Armin the Younger" and addressed me with "Dear Magnus," he had said a few serious questions for me and was very happy, if I could answer him this.
This was followed by - among others - these three questions:
What you really want with this page?
What you really want to achieve in your life?
You like to scold about vegans and other carnivores, uh ... pardon -esser? Why should the former be poorer people as the others?
In the first question, what I wanted with this page, of course "really" struck me immediately on the - the text shows that there is no Depp writes that his words did not choose to do - which insinuates, I gear here any foul play ,
The second "real" in terms of what I wanted to achieve in my life, but emphasizes that, then rather in the sense that I do not know quite what I wanted to achieve it.
The third question mentioned here, which is why the former, so vegans should be poorer people wore the untrue statement in the headers, I like schümpfe about vegans and other "non-meat eaters".
What now wants one that starts sweetly, anonymously of course, if he makes such questions in such a way?
Of course, he will bring me again Glatteise, causing me to justify myself. Twice insinuation that lie once, or in three questions: the so convenient as sufficient for this conclusion immediately.
I replied, not answering the questions, spontaneously something different, it might have to do so:
What you really asking here after Behufe this page? What you really asking here about my life Plane? Why do unterfütterst the question about poorer people with a lie? What really do you do so? Really knows you one? How you really say? How it really is with your life Plane?
From the consequence ago it would have been wiser, if at all, or so similar to respond.
On the other hand, would have the other, comfortably anonymous binding, had just reached but that I like as if I uttered perhaps just yet taken by his questions, so his goal at least partially, namely to put me as a public figure in a dubious light. (continue reading ... )
On the page "pressekompass.net" has my blog an unusual (poisoned?) Learn praise by left outside (where else?) Sorted (here often called "Sheep media" ...) in the compass of the most exciting prospects "international quality media", such as addressed the following:
'Yawn. So the blog comments unzensiert.zeitgeist-online.de the media response to the Data affair and the image will be drawn from the "Holy Santa Obama, Mr Nobel Peace Prize, Saint Transparency". Another Bush? This is Obama not only in terms of digital surveillance, but also "in terms of terrorist support, drone attacks and the performing covert wars." Wen surprised because even the NSA scandal? '
http://pressekompass.net/lauschangriff-2-0-horst-du-mich-amerika/
(Under the heading "concept" explains the side so:
"Every day we compile analyzes and comments from home and abroad on topics from politics, economy and society. Our products provide the most exciting prospects of international quality media directly opposite. The result: compact, informative summaries of the key positions on current events ").
I as a clear left wing, just above me, the world and the LATimes, the right-wing New York Times, German wave, Süddeutsche Zeitung and TAZ significantly below me.
After all, someone seems to have realized that a pronounced Patriot neither right nor must be down.
Now, however, beyond this quite serious small Scherzleins: This compilation is well made. The concept of the people of pressekompass.net (I have the page otherwise not studied in detail, it exists only since this year) could well rise in the long term.
I thank you in any case at this point, for a fair and clean content and wish to mention colleagues continued success.
There is hardly anything Idiotischeres as an article that seeks to explain its own article.
But firstly to the explanatory article is not a real article, but rather a Beinaheaphorismus. (Aphorisms we may not explain well known.)
I wrote under the title "From Blog to Lall":
"Blog is stupid. Drum Lall his name. "
This is about sovereignty and sustainable applied sociolinguistics as necessary Defendolinguistik serious, rigid precise Bello linguistics.
(Note also to the following Kommentarstrang: https://unzensiert.zeitgeist-online.de/2013/05/23/verlogene-obergranatenerzarschlocher-ii/#comments )
Moreover, in principle, an important, often too little attention stratagem. That fact, which reads: "Ridiculed? Set more than one better! " (more ...)
Again: the other writers or my texts for holding worthless, they do not read, or even link to - what? - Claw on their side.
If I can simply take everything for free, where it just stands around, because one was so pointless to portray it, use it not only for me but also for resale, it should be right. But before that I will smite this matter until that runs out to the hypocrites the destructive breath their art despicable lies.
What if one of them has painted a picture?
Can I just take it then, only canvas, frames and colors, maybe even pay Brush Cleaner distance setting?
The museum purely traipse, of course, to pay wages without entering the museum make people so voluntarily, take a Renoir, at the output plunk down a Fuffi?
WHO IS HERE corrupt? (more ...)
Since nothing is worth what sets free a writer like me into the net, anyone can turn it into a business by simply stealing it. If in any case he can. Worthless to take without asking to be picking up, was not a theft. Logical. And if I do not like, I am a narrow-minded, greedy, selfish, corrupt asshole. Assholes. Mendacious Obergranatenerzarschlöcher. Hypocritical and stupid to even imputed holiness. No one can own something, of its own creative format, here. What wonderful. Cowardly, impotent rabble parasites.
The text thieves in the network are virtually all - wofern to somehow make arrest - too cowardly to steal a Full Text at Springer, or FAZ, but do eagerly at comparatively defenseless, give even before, the victim of theft can still be happy that his work would such widespread.
And if the author the way there, do not want?
The perfidious thing is that a blogger like me, nevertheless it wofern verbally or even legally is ready to fight, he wofern the theft at all will notice, is very easily portrayed as petty, zukurzgekommener villain. This latent threat acts mostly, is fully taken into account in the game.
The little robbed you, the great one does not move on dear.
But: Pirates ye be warned! (more ...)
I want here in the introduction, only in part, by way of example, call in the escalation of yesterday experienced commentators discussion.
First, I had sharply attacked in fact myself by a core passage of other nachzitierte and so I voiced to:
Goeller: I beg you time to think about what you tell yourself in there for a weird, baseless nonsense.
Deck Name: The fact that you come crawling out, I realize. (For the quoted passage said nothing pseudonym.)
Deck Name: I stabbing into the hornet's nest, I realize, but it is watchable.
Goeller: I can crawl itself at least yet. Self out. (more ...)
"Fair is foul and foul is fair"
I translate Shakespeare times now very clear, contemporary: "Shrewd is stupid and stupid is smart".
Klug, so stupid are that cling to their pain-speakers; stupid, so wise, is the rest.
Also I was asked if I really saw a way to avoid hell. Given the hypnotized masses.
Yes and no.
Yes, because I only believe in two things: the possibility of recovery and the ability to learn. (And the reason quite really are no beliefs, because I've seen both, so therefore white.)
No, because I do not believe in hell. (Although I was already there as a child, but that was just my personal hell, not "hell".)
By now the asked me no otherworldly concept appealed, but hell on earth, in the sense that you can build a schmerzphongesteuerten (soon painful glasses controlled) world slave state, I say again: Yes, I see a way to avoid hell.
The path may seem to many burdensome, not be easy, but it is very simple: It's about those up to be. Some call it identity. (more ...)
As to the price collapse of the gold, slurs and lies a more stupid than the other. It is smooth laugh. (Follow links, quotes and factual discussion. Or not.)
So we make a joke of it only once. After all, there is no shortage to yes in conspiracy theories, such that all of these, since in principle idiotic, refer to the realm of paranoia, while they themselves, the more likely not even noting that spread. These count wrong to overlook crucial or embezzled.
"How came gold to the highest values? - It always gives himself "(A not quite accurate, complete memory zuwenigst quote from Nietzsche's" Thus Spoke Zarathustra "Hehe..).
Everything is as usual. The one puzzle, the other, even though they "knew" the opposite (hähähehe!), Until recently, all the top Sander analysts and investment recommenders (who always win, because it does not matter for what bullshit they collect their commissions) are again smarter than the rest. (Maybe I'm not going to not be bothered with all the quotations, etc.. It is Sunday, and it is probably not even pay me only half-way decent for it.)
After all, I once again had the only right, as I predicted becoming the gold demise as occurring prior to the end of the world. (The search function top right takes you to the proof, unless the World Network also still crashes from. Bin Laden is alive.)
I would have done it just as a jackal. At 1600 sale, in 1300, when things are going well, even by 1000 or 800 bought again. From something you ultimately have to live. (Against 10,000 Euros in advance they get here is a surefire investment recommendation, price subject to change.) (more ...)
Armin reader has already set on its side an article (the predecessor I want, as announced at him, even adequately appreciate) that contains remarkable, which I now first quote a longer passage:
"No, actually I'm not a fan of computers, not a fan of mobile phones, simply not a fan of digital farts.
No, even worse, I hate them.
This, even worse, since my buns profession has from time to time to deal with them because I know them intimately since intimately long translucent years, exploring, need, use, buy, dispose of, yes to me empathize even in mine, a strangely effective intuition have developed over them, often almost prophetically knows where it hurts them when they give up their spirit, thought them to be able to talk.
But, I hate them. Where there is hatred here No offense, but rather desperate. Because I hate my dependence on them, the social new standards, they evoke, the global dependence of the masses within the meaning of work, entertainment and communication, in the sense of lost friends, the Facebook friends glad, and perhaps even genuine were or now would be can.
I hate the domination of the computer. Computers dominate the economy, screens dominate the life to which our eyes are all square ... "
http://www.conspirare.net/w2/der-mann-des-weissen-der-ins-schwarze-schritt-oder-warum-ich-steve-mochte-und-computer-hasse /
... In the sense of lost friends, the Facebook friends hot and possibly times were real now or could have been. (!!!) (more ...)
Meanwhile, the allusurpatorische Globalistengesindel actually has a serious problem. More and more are left - in simple terms - nationally, so right, and more and more rights are international, so left.
The center, those pseudo-liberal, pampered by the globalists center, thins out not only always on; it threatens even their loss of status, that it is seen more widespread because already, as rückstandig, marginal, and that no matter how much the media praise sheep whose ostensible rationality daily.
Increasingly, we see libertarians, true conservatives, socialists, patriots, real human, Christians, Nietzschean, the Deibel know what traditionally hardly converged on common platforms, canvassing, as the Hydra could be overthrown.
The sides of any allegations of Systemmmedien, you care, because a better, fairer monetary and economic order Aiming, Nazi ideology dreams, international socialist spinning, at best, intellectually underprivileged something to grab more and more into the void. We know these same old drool resist anyone who even dares to think publicly because of how privatized from the prevailing total Finanzschakalerei, in the global gains favor less, losses are socialized on the back of all, is to liberate. More and more people can not be more impressed by this obviously crucial orchestrated controlled agitation.
So the new center is growing daily. And the old one is always senile, ridiculous, fackt in their idiocy, senile eyes rolling, its economic policy to the rollator own end pushing, always visible further. (more ...)
Am just once again fall on a sentimental Weibsblog.
Not a Gran Relevant, but the people, probably men, as you saw in the comments, like it.
The latter on the fly - I was ever there, and it was not much different - I did not find a statement of content: Each feels with each and every and each and each with each, and that seems to do so well, that a lot comes together.
I often wonder how boring it must be people that make up this kind of hobby-horses. (more ...)
For once, I imagine, because the important thing to me, that part of a commentary on " by the state as a unifying regulative Dudes "on page reader here again a:
"It passes, in fact, no way around it that every single fights on site, as well as he can.
However, the - as I single father to be, it does not get any easier - in connection with the public school systems, a very tricky thing, because it brings in no time their children into trouble, then it were not to blame, that they, wofern not soon the youth office is around the corner, yet the more takes in a headlock. So are usually childless that to know exactly what they were doing, because they do not have to.
Some of them laugh a downright nor from that you have been so stupid to blame for the Wolverines this system, children, even to go so far that you had so sinned against his Nachwuchse. So far, some of those heroes who bask in wearing no responsibility for, except for himself. With that I will no longer respond so mild as before.
Anonymous tolerances around the web, make other demands of due consequent resistance, plump, fat, ignorant, cowardly. "Jockele go 'above you!" (I believe you, dude, not a representative of that.)
Nameless bullies. Still their foresight and intelligence brüstend that they are not made vulnerable about children. I have to restrain myself not to engage in the bottom drawer of my Schimpfwörterprachschatzes.
Just a single person would have to have the courage to attack, with the lowered visor. Of this I see but not much.
Bräsig, better off sitting around and knowing modest. Having much more time, much less risk as possible, looking down upon others. "
-----------------------------
Who wants to start a hard verbal quarrel with me is anhiero cordially invited. Commentators under code names an answer from me will receive at most be. I will then their posts, as long as they remain in the adjacent frame here, still activate, but nothing more to say. In this Strange, should one arise, is now once discriminated clearly and consistently positive. Full asocial.
Dude reader, avid commentator here, now operates its own page:
http://dudeweblog.wordpress.com/
I will not praise over this measure; the reason is not lawful in itself, because we work together at different levels and, has now developed also earnestly related disagreements hopefully a lasting friendship.
Dude is (forgive me, Dude, the halbboshaften, three-quarters of serious joke) Whole lot of "spiritual" than me. He has for a much clearer view of the world (which I sometimes wonder what, not quite understand).
Through a complex but clear and structured page layout, his years of tireless activities and experience in various forums, his consistent bravery, he has stamped within weeks considerable own platform from the ground. (more ...)
Yesterday I had to take harsh criticism.
For over a year I would go too much with the cleaver around, very often three hitting on poor religions, allzumal my aphorisms to be partly underground.
Hardly once I wrote Beautiful, edifying, Hinanführendes. And if it vorkomme once, let the cynicism and sarcasm in the all around it under, so that it barely perceive. I would occur only shards, which there is already enough, even smaller, alswelches a vain, useless, especially as inexpensive art.
My objection to the effect that I mean to make a necessary work to do, because I did not see that it would so adequately done elsewhere, helped little. Even small shards Treads give it Genung.
Now I feel honored least to the effect (you have to make the best out of everything), that the hauptbehuflichen Scherbenzertreter but apparently trusted to be able to something else. Otherwise I would have probably not asked to do it.
In fact, however, the criticism contains truth; on religious and esoteric fuss I have been so often, so hard, redundant (I confess myself in the pedagogy quite shamelessly to the principle of repetition, although here also must exercise a measure), hergemacht that I will take care reduces this area. (I had prior to the sharp criticism even have the feeling that there are now so once long. Insofar wore my critics, as he likes to call it, legs of lamb to mutton castle.)
It is also clear that, at least if one proceeds as me, these things constantly Picking up personal feelings hurt; for each like to do that in a text or another set this effect; and if not in that text, so in another. So, that almost only this particular sentence or a partial execution is perceived, the rest around it hardly. Man turns away. (more ...)
Conspirare.net is back. I'm looking for Armin.
Quote from the first new item:
"Anyway, it's a big mistake to let themselves be swayed to let others wander over to become almost mad myself from all that wander, quit out of sheer wrong with writing, they misled themselves, irr to solidify to get lost in the questions that you irrerweise turns to the whole. "
http://www.conspirare.net/w2/irren-ist-menschlich/
See also:
https://unzensiert.zeitgeist-online.de/2013/03/02/diesen-autor-in-die-klapse/
Seems just the idea of founding the first Ungeheimbund the world.
Anyone can become a member for free, but only under real names and the written insurance to belong to any secret society.
Come out that a member yet belongs to a secret society, it is made public, the membership expires at the same time and can be applied again after ten years.
The aim of the nonprofit Ungeheimbundes is to gather information about all secret societies in the world and to provide the network for discussion, so that by and by a constantly supplemented and improved global secret society created encyclopedia. (more ...)
It has, by the taught us in school with the freedom of expression, made a serious mistake.
Many students namely, the self lernfaulsten who likes to hear, this principle found objectionable in any way.
Later the Helleren but had to find among them, that what they learned at school as most well-liked, even then it was a lie.
How much more today because there is not only language and speech prohibitions in dizzying speed, but also the de-facto bids.
Idle to cite examples here, because every free spirit knows enough of it.
The phenomenon affects not only us but certainly, the UN-enemy state. (more ...)
Degrees have the "Removable Marie" (formerly probably the "John", etc.) and the "Dude" (which is the name of my knowledge always so) in this Jesus-strand started a small skirmish with respect to their code names, which insofar as I, it will continue should, heel quickly redirect here. (Whether "Jesus" and a cover name was? Who knows?)
I've written here by a sadly departed friends, the "James". He had this name is given at some point, even in civil life (except perhaps at the office), so that I only found out after his death, which Christian name he bore. He did not like very well. I will therefore not betray him again. Only so much that it was a very traditional, however not overly common German name.
Another friend - at a young age - was Detlev. The bugged him powerful. If you wanted to make it fully on the palm, so you had to speak to him only with Detlev. Not pseudonym with which he ausbedang is to be referred exclusively because Detlev should be able to remain as anonymous Detlev - In the case I now call the quite ordinary - German. (I do not know if he now calls itself again Detlev; I lost it long out of sight.) Sure, why he wanted to be a Detlev. The name was then, at best even with Olaf as a competitor, as a gay name in vogue. That he suffered not at all. Too much noise, too much smoke.
I myself never gave me a nickname, except maybe - I do not remember exactly thirty years ago - for a few hours in a slum in North America, where I wanted to avoid unfavorable questions, because my white skin color was quite suspicious; if I remember correctly, I called me Michael or so, pronounced in English, which was nothing special, and I could easily remember my lie.
Many, however, do not realize how much their chosen code name says about it. I import times, what changes ... aka Marie aka Jochen has just set over this: (more ...)