Instead of pausing to take back something that the U.S. network giant is behaving even more brazen.
Google schikaniert seine YouTube-Videoeinsteller, also genau die, von welchen die Tochter lebt, wie als ob sie dort zum Bittgang müssten.
The young German activist network "Jasinna" has now described very nicely.
One should deliver still further, Clear Name ago, phone number, Google + account, otherwise it no longer properly funzt, and videos with over 15 minutes in length no longer run.
Well fine.
This excellent service of the NSA, which also makes good private business, the NSA but also saves a lot of money by getting what they want, without having to even hold the capacity for it, so keeps us all for Depp Staner, for remote Borgs.
That CONTENT not by programmers, computers, generated by algorithms, but only processed and made available, so you should be glad to be able to be an avid service provider, if you already own creates nothing interesting that you have probably forgotten, or you it displaces, where "Do not be evil!" the motto.
"Suck them all out and enslave them thorougly!": That would be recognized honest.
Yes, to the search, I use the services of this company yet. Die sollen ruhig sehen, was mich interessiert. Since they already see that even one so much interested in what should not interest him. In addition, a good customer, also in the sense of the incoming traffic.
I'm a journalist but also in a different position because an innocent owner.
However, it may very well be that I Google will eventually no longer use (which does not mean that the company does not yet figure out how I will look for information), me it a shite still interested in how, where do I stand there in the Range .
And even even if I get downgraded everywhere, on page 37, or 115 order get less traffic. This may eventually be even completely no matter to me.
In addition to the monitoring (the case of other user behavior, if it is not quite set, about every other service probably will remain similarly effective.): This is about harassment
How much of that can you offer?
If no other service (providing, of course, the NSA, or she taps him from) friendly offer his services?
When I see that I somewhere to some "account", so open an account, to even just to leave comments, I usually have the channel fully. Here with me no one needs an account in order to say something may.
Am I a banker? Kann ich nicht froh sein, wenn jemand sich spontan interessiert, etwas sagen will, ohne sich registrieren zu lassen, erstmal noch Epost, Passwort, den ganzen Schiet sich reinziehen muss?
Pages, where I first "log in" I must, after just such filing, I boycott a long time. Why do they do that?
Um ihre Zensurnotwendigkeiten besser abschätzen zu können?
So they can lock me trouble, if they want to?
As yet make a lot of private, smaller media and operators ultimately similar than what Google now attaches to YouTube.
Anything else would be a real name Forum, where you can specify only occurs, as before in the classic letter if the name specified and the editorial also known address. Then open sight for all who have the ass to in the pants. (And maybe the head on the neck.)
So people report below deck name that many in any case, try to hide their IP, which is also not funzt so pretty, thereby making even more suspicious, in short, a single stupid Gepfitze.
Google is just the tip of the iceberg.
We generally need to rethink.
