With the funniest thing over the level occupied by itself people is that they, as the mass spellbound by their preponderance, do not even notice how obviously that of their vanity, their smugness, their ungegründete complacency, the hinhorcht right, all based on the presentation of their is favorite sentences and words.
Most people of this type 'feature that is only a maximum of a dozen verbal sleight of hand; like their speech and otherwise act fairly smooth and supple. (more ...)
I just did what I often do wisely.
I recommended my big Filio, sometimes my last article to read for finger and Irisscannerei: who could interest him.
In no time at all - probably the bean stew sake - he was through.
"And?"
"Well, go on."
"Why is that?"
"You've given yourself 'win-win situation' and 'easy going' and so used stuff where you reject the but otherwise so hard."
"Yes, and intentionally. It all depends on when, what really appropriate to the context. "
"Yeah, it's fine."
By abrauschte thus in the direction of its electric box to weiterzugamen its social development game, I called him yet for: "Quod licet Jovi, non licet Bovi! Jupiter is not the Ox! "- He the door to. (more ...)
"Islam is part of Germany."
Saudi Arabia, he obviously belongs; but he is no longer part of Mali really, at least not like there.
Sad-funny it gets that anyone who rejects Islam, contrary smashed, "" Islam did not exist, yes. What the pöhse Diskriminateur and racist etc. fanatasiere there? If the religion of peace, however, should belong to Germany, then it is available with a "The".
You turn it around, as you need it now. Islamists who do not want to kill the same all Christians and Jews (possibly the rest), do not say this in any case, the talk is of "moderate".
So no need because, it seems as if at German schools also teaching of Islam, ie instruction in religion, the one founded, is said to have taken his favorite wife of 9 years. So a ... (more ...)
I read up on the untangegebenen page:
"Parallel'll dress and silver again and outperform the gold price."
http://www.finanzen100.de/finanznachrichten/wirtschaft/edelmetall-spekulanten-schicken-silberpreis-auf-talfahrt_H1882970970_50268/
One who told me this and this and this will "outperform", I could not even for a zersplissenen and three times gefatzten laces.
Either he does not know better to say, then that is a cretin.
Or he knows what he wreaks because: he is a jackal.
It can of course also be an intersection of the two. (more ...)
Berthold Kohler of the FAZ could.
Even colleagues to come times in the "Language gloss" (which to my knowledge is not so long) to speak, but he is the one who gives me there always fun. And as editor of the newspaper, hereby someone who normally would always give the maximum Respectable.
I recommend you So, I put the now notweis in the nominative, " overly intellectual nonsense "to read.
Encouraging that such a Bekopfter can assert itself in such a way. (more ...)
I had just such a case again. I changed "start" at a post-correction "start" in.
There, every word counts, and there are now times not synonyms. (more ...)
Since there is no "forbidden words" (except for the word "taboo word" perhaps), I try it now before the workstation in 2012 identified with the word idiot of the year. (more ...)
We know goers Beyond what we do.
We are times over here, over there in time we go to the border.
Already on the boundary few understand us; when we go in the afterlife, almost no one just yet.
It may be that we even drink a glass of wine, or two: But we do not need drugs to go in the hereafter.
It revolves around a conscious Sichaußerhalbsetzen.
Just read the Quixote.
Should also be read with me.
We walk there through the worlds where no more Medizynik white hinzudiagnostizieren. (more ...)
Today I deromaßen excited me that I would have burst as a balloon with certainty.
What that will be here in more detail topic, but not now.
Indeed, it is first addressed in principle.
I want to have energized me so far back that I can decently upset me again.
I read and heard from people who talk and act the same Alwissen, perform as professionals - and just the areas concerning where I mean really know about me! - So bold, arrogant and bräsig, elementary reversed Gezeugs that I would almost rather that followed children's toys to the known end.
I will stay in troubled waters. That must read none. Simply click away.
To teaching and language, language acquisition, such Subterranean that temporarily grabbed me the bare anger. Yes, sometimes I was right today "emo". (Also, it will have more to say, the associated weak incongruities and lies.)
No wonder that people want an apocalypse. I will not sweep away the resulting dirt. So enough brain dirt. (more ...)
This whole Tolkienerei'm mightily on the bag.
Now is already herumgeschwurbelt of the man had access to ancient esoteric knowledge.
I admit that I have only read about rather lackluster in his clothes.
Although his English language undoubtedly of great power.
The images are strong.
But Something has always prevented me from suffering all this also drawn Gemache to the end.
Was it not my Primitivlingstum, it was something else. (more ...)
I think that the term "gay" part frowned upon.
For he discriminated against women in an unacceptable manner.
Anyway stands out - I do not mean that I think about it imagining! - That being "gay" not nearly brings social benefits, like being gay.
Do make the test: How many successful, critically acclaimed, self-confessed lesbian can you think of spontaneously?
I only come on Alice Schwarzer and Anne Will.
In the gay presented the list from here to Alaska.
So the men oppress women again. (more ...)
While in the comment string to "To relax: A small Crowley-Lug ", but rather in response to" Beuys' concept of art: A Settlement "wrote reader Lisa the following:
"Supposedly you can not define what art is. I, for one, have defined it, and - of course this is only true for me - is art in any form is a statement which goes beyond what is already known, detects new aspects of man, describes or represents and expresses in any form. Seen in the technical inventions were the most important art in the 20th century for me. But technology and science as art is of course controversial. "
The second part from "Seen ..." I will not discuss here first separately, but it leads to the completeness and half of its weight still on with.
So let us pull the core out of the definition: "Art in any form is a statement which transcends over the already known, detects new aspects of man, describes and expresses in some way."
My only suggestion is to go first to remove the duplication, either: ". Art in any form is a statement which transcends over the already known, detects new aspects of man, describes and expresses"
Or: "Art is a statement about what has been also known, detects new aspects of man, describes and expresses in some way."
I do not want to decide first because, especially Lisa decide which version they prefer, even if it is the original, redundant.
Rather, I wonder if there could be missing something important. (more ...)
"For pure will, unassuaged of purpose, is every way perfect."
The above is a quote from memory that "Liber Al" that Aleister Crowley (or its Herunterkanalers), but it might be true.
I'm trying times on a new translation: "For pure will, unerweicht of purpose is allwegs perfect."
So what primitive for such grandiose lies!
In willing himself always puts a purpose, a goal, a pre-Exempt, as a desirable Hinge Featured, Erachtetes! (more ...)
Earlier it was there: the temptation to corruption.
It had long been dammed, that I would take apart the concept of art of Joseph Beuys once thoroughly.
Now it was just Lisa zuspielte me the ball.
Not only do they have often interesting thoughts here introduced; it also seems to be a woman, and I'm so old-fashioned, maybe just live to know that I do not like antrete hard against the idea of women.
Dear me, it would have been, in fact, my friend R., who is on her line, or another, would have thrown me here Beuys on the table.
But it would be cowardly, corrupt been to take the ball is not in accordance with, just because he was playing me of a (putative) wife, I have for some sympathy next Attention to the field.
Maybe I was not surprised, never talked her a word to me.
This is certainly not what I want.
But: If I had to submit this fear?
Am I not first of all the truth, wisdom, as I see it, has assigned? (more ...)
I just read (yes, I know, the beginning accumulates, but he is honest) on the home page of an interesting young newspaper project on how the journalistic staff should write.
Especially funny were the Notes to readers binding introduction.
Mittendrein, jumped into a pictorial scene as possible, should the issue be torn, TV-ways, for instance by way of the reader entrained in the text.
Ja nu. This is an old thing that was already apparent in experience essays the fourth and fifth notch above did not apply; Teachers and media consumers want to be entertained and read especially the beginning and the end.
The question, however, in many contexts, especially when the climax should be in the middle parts, this still grow a lot of drama, whether already one, so something must be taken in the first movement suddenly in the ice-cream man purely jostle must immediately. Yeah, and best equal direct speech here.
The range is good introductions as large as that of the possible, but not as frequently as the total realized.
That means: You can enter a relevant text with an "ES", then next line "HAS ME", then next line starting poetry or initiate continuous text, so this makes sense. Or with a "Actually, Grandma had anyway usually quite by ..." or "In Chihuatl the Mezcatl met the Kratl ..." or "Top not as crooked as a typical banana, the keyboard turns her forehead ram conditions screen, the letters sparks stieben ... "etc. (more ...)
Grade I learned a sleek new English word: "scumpire".
It comes obviously from "scum" (scum) and "empire" (empire).
It is intended to mean, well, that opens up by itself.
How could it mean in German?
"Trash Empire"? "Schandreich"? "Schindreich"?
Should now - see previous article - "flash mob" to be a "flash Rotte", it would from the "cash mob" almost said of course, a "cash Rotte".
What do we do then with the "smart mobs"?
This is not a first language scientific problem, because the "smart mobs" only one so far ill-defined, only alleged sub-variant of "flash mobs", ie the flash Rotten represent. (more ...)
About the new term "cash mob" it occurred to me that I do not even "flashmob" a German word for know one thing that I at least when a fairly significant social phenomenon described is not easy to sit back, at least for me, on me leave.
I find no reasonable, the already introduced, so I have to invent one.
At least try.
So I came because to "lightning rotting." (more ...)
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
