In the world there are roughly three network types writers.
The first is simply anonymous.
The second shows the name and face, but reveals little or no real heart.
The third shows up without a visor.
All three have their place, their reasons. (more ...)
Manner is one of his grown findings from umfässlicher life experience with precise thinking, sensitivity, an enormous powers of association, a sharpened art sense and intuition as to bingen in accordance able that he can meet both far-reaching and profound statements about general human issues, as examine and assess by analog capture him as yet has come under things and their gear. His knowledge of human nature and effortless fluency enable him here, so to give others the right time Council that he understood effective. He never thinks lightly rather not, hears in his insatiable curiosity, his infinite appetite for further knowledge, never to learn and even things that already appear clear a thousand times, again and again to question and think through.
Summed up to the aphorism by recognized it as a text type? Hardly. He is slick.
I have often asked myself whether it was wise to suspend nightmares intentionally.
I tend to the question now at no general, but restrained, cautious yes.
First, because of "intentionally": You can nightmares when woken up, purposeful manner, it is just that you stay a while awake, thinking about something else. But you can also just go back. (Both works not necessarily like clockwork, but it works in principle.)
Better to avoid nightmares, of course, is that all the terrible things crazy not need to see that a can, quite well known enforce. In sleep, and even after that.
Other: Why did you nightmares? (more ...)
Earlier, I had tuition half again to do with one of those pathetic, meaningless modern short stories by which men for decades with great success torments not only high school students, but also students of literature.
As it was said (it was fortunately a short short story, barely three quarters side) among others, almost to the beginning, a man gets to know the underage person narrator: "He was wearing jeans, jacket and pants."
Remarkable. Not only that, the guy still wearing his pants first (it comes in a Relationship later not to sexual full course), he also wore a pair of jeans to do so. (You can of course also be understood differently; funny is it anyway.)
This must Lolitas (he is, as it turns out the same afterwards, screenwriter and director) so difficult to turn on when a mature man first, wearing a pair of pants, she may not even have themselves been get, and additionally a pair of jeans! (more ...)
I hear for over a year a radio station that not only whether seinerIn selection of music, but especially also of the other services of MörderatorInnen ago mostly very good like that. Flux-FM.
But now's, you will have guessed, about time for criticism. (more ...)
In one of the Sacred Books, which was given to humanity, Grimm's dictionary of the German language, it is, under the entries "massacre", according to various derivations that there read, under 5): masons, converted into unehrbare meaning, the pfaff köchin, pimp a pfaffen
Then the poor, brave, honorable originally Mechthild whose nickname, even to pimp the mercenary, later, in more recent use of language, in general, a whore.
And what happened to the first prostitute who first penetrated as little maid into German from Latin forth afterwards an "innocent" young virgin was!
Language can be really mean. (more ...)
Who wants to be a full-ideological edge: UG Krishnamurti read.
(I mean the UG. Not the other Thanks again, James, that you give me his core font "No Way Out" mitbrachtest, for the hours that we were disputing about the beers.)
It is certainly not easy to recognize what he is wrong, what is missing.
Not for small children. Really, what for advanced nutcrackers.
Oh, there's macabre typos.
I just read on to the drab, threatening dictatorial developments in the US, and a journalist wrote, "marital law" instead of "martial law".
So marriage law, thinking martial law. (more ...)
I always feel quite assured of the experience here that even "nerds" the first hour hardly have a plan of how Google actually works.
The reason is that they do not think multilayered and are unable to read properly. They are said weakly. And think weak. Both are related logically.
Many of them think seriously, they could Google with bits & bytes, using all kinds of cheap tricks to outwit. No, Kinners, try the thousands every day: How stupid the world leader in web search is not.
I do not know how many programmers I would need your silly tricks is to further instruct the only salaried philologist, that it. And at the level where I competently, legally screened
Well, but I could only German, probably not entirely, partially also English, afford. With five hundred men, but (mine set to philologists), each perhaps, we are generous, $ 200,000 a year, the computers are always there, so flabby 100 million, almost petty cash, I would not have all but essential and also yet most of your Sottisen world under control.
Well, the programmer also still cost what are, as they have indeed learned something decent, a bit more expensive, slower as well, so we round unkleinlich to half a billion that your not as easy fooled me. I have it all, because I am the world market leader and will remain so. What else do I have to do? - Yes, admittedly, a few other things; but this is important enough that I do not covet it.
Google is undoubtedly what is rightly called a "data octopus". What, however, it should be otherwise? This however is his business. (more ...)
I always wonder how naturally it's still that one can make the other the accusation that he think so at that and not, do not think enough is too weak in faith, faith in reality but, namely to the lack of faith, why he were lying, at least belöge be so
The other day told me one that I know have no idea of what I believed everything I pretended not to believe, I believe, supra, just yet, and that as the sow ...
In fact, I think the things I can not yet clearly appreciate for established, probable, reasonable, sensible, agreeable to me, better than others.
The resourceful Glauboist derives from the same then - see you !!! -: So he was right, I would give it myself involuntarily.
In fact, I believe - proved beyond any doubt, it is ultimately not -. That it is not necessarily harms everyone, if he can learn (more ...)
Now I know that you still can continue to work very well in a dream.
In some ways, it's even easier, because the guards. (more ...)
The Gender keys utilize a basically amazing see-through Hauptstrategems. That, to my knowledge, not yet sufficiently discovered.
So we catch ourselves the time.
On the one hand, keyword "gender mainstreaming", men and women want to put all natural differences, hereby, if not impotent, so at least be sterile. In addition, nor stupid.
On the other hand, this report emphasizes the difference, but only to the Behufe, gender rushing against another, envy, hatred, to sow discord. They want the gender war, while there should be no more.
Not with me, you usually do not even chess circle class capable liar, one takes you seriously just because you heard the sheep press and the rest of the bullshit.
Some feel, others do not think. Let yourself be told that. I give you not just one.
Yes, I suppose you notgezwungen seriously. Because I can not see past simple of all the evil that you have still managed to inflict.
No child is more natural, uncontaminated by you, grow up. You put everything we can deploy your poison already in cribs and hoarding. So Wider Appeal to that. I a nasty of you cowards. I know this clear word.
It is obvious what you want. Divide et impera. Who captures the love can prevail over hatred directed.
(By the way: With Islam, this makes it almost as I prefer but not now even closer in Although there are quite intertwined with the subject I know very well also but that your gonna get again separately thus it sits now...... )
I know exactly've already not once said on this page that you indeed boys clearly with your child drug shit, fo- cus, but women, even though most was not previously noted (read here not everyone) still far sneaky ride on the wall, into suffering.
I see through your destruction, your sick lust from A to Z.
Read'd better off. It occurs, for something else. (more ...)
The most beautiful, uplifting Enste in linguistics, perhaps, is that there is nothing in them unimportant.
However, when making angucke me those Quantenquantler as herumquanteln without even knowing what a quant is because we are schiergar colleagues.
Emphasis on schiergar.
A sound is in fact a sound. Does everyone who can hear. (more ...)
I just received my efforts, which peerblog.de (the oblique blog Peer Steinbrück, at the same time not his) is concerned, my esteemed readers of Thomas and Dude the following critical comments in:
"Just let them do it. What's been peer blog worth in network ... "
And:
"Waste of time!
As if it draufankäme whether a Steinbrück- or Merkel puppet moves in the Chancellery.
Is it the same as Romney vs. Obama.
I really do not understand how one can waste so much valuable time for as unimportant and extraneous crap as it really is so much Relevant to what might be mind!
Tammisiech! "
Both lines of argument at first appear valid. Thomas I said initially that I had just done something Linguistics, should interest the much less people than what is happening around the Absahnkanzlerkandidaten around.
In fact, I'm going to sink my teeth hardly weeks in those bumbling blog. But it is something else. (more ...)
I just heard a rehearsed on Youtube radio show (perhaps twenty minutes from one and a half hours), and it was not in fact so that the very eloquent respondents would never have said "uh", but what far more often, too often as pointless filler, conspicuous in his speech, drove usually in the middle of a sentence was "you know".
The phenomenon has long been known, and some usually somewhat inflated linguistically less well-off you have to it, despite its suggestive term bill semantics ("uh" or "um" means disabled when stressed aware only that the speaker just yet knows what he continued to say, but do not break, do not want to be interrupted), at least at first just as a weakness, bad habit, habitual, check off.
If the speaker now but one who acts otherwise, as though he knew what he says, obviously otherwise freely (in prefabricated speeches I've heard most times one as a real stylistic or just a never seen so many "you knows" for the purpose of conviction) talking, talking aware of precisely formulating, so I told this as clear criticism. (Wofern I suspected that he wanted to hear it then. Maybe, if not very likely.)
One may well wonder whether one of his "you knows" that constantly jumping into his speech (you know very well that the zuwenigst come mostly involuntarily), perhaps subconsciously more self seeks to convince them of what has been said, because even the other, the audience.
Viewed from this level here, come to the competence of the speaker quite different than those in doubt on a manifest chatterbox, a wannabe, a Dampfsabbler. (more ...)
That almost all fear of Friedrich Nietzsche have known. It is also clear why.
Before Heinrich von Kleist, however, so I have found over the years, have pretty much the same people fear that makes your pants before Nietzsche.
Now Kleist has never said so revolutionary philosophy, Nietzsche alswie doubt. So what has the just because he wrote very good plays and outstanding novels, he done so bad?
I think I know what. He has committed at least two cardinal sins. (more ...)
The first time I was awakened son at the dinner table.
What something hot in Latin, with street or tram, I should have asked half awake.
A little later he shooed me again on the bed.
"Dad, I have a headache!"
"Yeah yeah. Let's continue to write me and bring me a beer! "- I babbled.
After all.
Latin, writing and Beer: I know myself längweis instinctively what is important.
The federal government wants to battle drones for future missions abroad (commonly known as: wars of aggression) purchase.
"Armed Enlightenment" was "absolutely necessary".
Now I know less Sprachpfitzler happy again, since when one warrior, or here war devices that shoot, with what they have, as scouts, as "armed reconnaissance" means.
Is this a new translation from English? (more ...)
A few weighing the first article .
Right is so evil that seeks a geopolitical agreement with China and Russia.
Wrong, so properly, the Brzezinski-Doktin to follow initially encircle these two powers, and finally plunged into chaos destroying put into effect.
Properly located, so that is unjust, not only will the differences between the sexes not to abolish but ignored, even underestimated, says those.
Wrong, so really, is to promote egalitarianism gender to their mental and physical infertility and finally destruction. (more ...)
I have again my thoughts on the outlined by Jon Rappoport made (German translation by me) destruction of logic. (For English-speaking Jons original article directly here .)
Not only that, as he shows, an idea, an idea, a concept, therefore, sight unseen can be damn unchecked, because it comes from a disagreeable person: the thing goes further.
For example, have many animal rights activists and vegetarians without even having personally insulted or attacked or invaded his stables ever a pig, must listen that Hitler had indeed been vegetarians.
Not only that, some has been abused directly as a Nazi, because like Hitler a vegetarian.
And: Can I now that I'm not a vegetarian, it is impossible to be a Nazi? (Why's that supposed to be a stupid question?)
And in fact the Nazis in 1933 adopted the first animal protection law, campaigned for species conservation. Should we abolish animal welfare again why? As many types eradicate?
In the United States of "conservatives" and some "libertarians", often a line from the German Natonalsozialismus drawn to animal and environmentalists ((see, so call themselves mostly) even those who do not undergo climate atrocity propaganda only against nuclear power are or fracking, genetically modified seeds, etc.).
Should we then also against animal welfare be, for nuclear power, Monsanto corn, every day, eat three cutlets, to avoid being called a Nazi? (I am the way, not aware that would have been between 1933 and 1945 anyone except to the onset disaster of war, forced into Germany, to become a vegetarian. I do not even know of a large-scale propaganda campaign, because of meat eating was "un-Aryan" . "un-German" or the like it should have been but that, I will of course correct it here nachreichend.)
Clear that environmentalists now - still mad? Abuse supporters of Monsanto & Co described as "Gennazis", people who reject the climate alarmist Al Gore & Co. as "Climate Nazis." - (Monsanto has "national" nothing to do with the slightest, just as little as the Klimakatastropheten On the contrary, international, it is hardly possible that extent they were, though -.. Although the appeal of something strange - as "Geninternazis" respectively "Air Inter Nazis" to . specify)
Clear (yes: CLEAR!) That the comparison of "climate deniers" (such as whether the presence of a climate-denying) with "Holocaust deniers" has already been drawn and often is. (more ...)
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
