Archive for the 'Linguistics'

From new beginning end

Saturday 05 April 2014

This blog is from this - last post serves only comment pointing - at least in the longer term.

This means that all contributions continue to be called, opened the comment, I will respond, where appropriate.

After more than five years and more than 4000 articles, it's time.

My special, heartfelt thanks to all who here manchesmal at great expense, often very suggestive, involved.

It may also well be that here - or anderwo, perhaps also in printed form - will eventually appear a compilation of my opinion most important published texts.

As everyone can imagine easily that knows me, I'll allzumal not set the literary creation.

Also, I will earnestly still supervise my zeitgeist-print column or write on the side zeitgeist-online.de something. (more ...)

Opposition, rather Jermain!

Thursday, March 27, 2014

When estimated Jermain foutre le Camp can find a nice list of quotes on writing and the writer.

http://ultimativefreiheitonline.wordpress.com/2014/02/04/der-zustand-des-schreibenden-teilt-sich-dem-wahren-leser-sogleich-vollig-mit/

Alone, the Goethe quote that he chose the title, is not my consent: "The state of the writer the true reader shares immediately with completely."

And it's not because I know how loyal readers, despite its undoubted skills and achievements, no sovereign admirer of Goethe am much do detest what he has done.

The set is from my own experience how other along my knowledge of literary creation just is not right. (more ...)

Google does not yet Allah

Saturday, February 15, 2014

By Google under my Image Search to Magnus Goeller still assigns a Hitler image, while the other search result is still more ridiculous and irrelevant, I was told very firmly that I should not be sitting on me, I should, no, I had the "Report inappropriate photo" in Google at least report the better send equal a juicy e-mail, even better, with lawyer threat.

I beg your pardon? What should I do?

MESSAGE REFUND?

At the company, the German free tutoring takes many years for me, me for me initially quite weighed (as I said, until recently was little to complain about in the classifieds), now treated as a Unterpariah of Netzsubprekariats?

Should I beg these wayward giant squid about? (more ...)

Bermuda Triangle of Vernünfte

Monday, February 10, 2014

"Bermuda Triangle of Vernünfte": the pun brought me earlier with a student.

He has him by his own admission of his German teacher, so related it to his students, as he was now probably ended up with them right there (it is uncertain whether he actually "the Vernünfte" said or not but "reason").

The brave schoolboy now transferred the nice discovery in his homework on the Schmerzphon and how it affects its users.

He took her in any case intuitively at hand, because I had to explain to him that "reason" is not normally pluralized, so I just quite liked the one with the Vernünften here.

Black Hole of healths.

Abyss of knowledge.

Schlingschlund the Arese and Aphrodite.

Maelstrom of the joint.

Grave pit of minds.

Mrs. Hendricks philosopher trumps

Monday, February 10, 2014

"Powerful contain" will be the new German Environment Minister Barbara Hendricks (SPD) in the EU voting for the approval of GM maize variety 1507th

Berlin appendix sets of Goldman Sachs & Co. So still falls a more extra-fine bullshit.

Soon you will be powerful not drink glasses and in court when charged with failure to assist, simply say that you've been watching but powerful.

I'm just not in the best forces in doing something powerful, but still powerful öberste in idleness tip.

In doing nothing nothing remains undone: The already said Lao Tzu.

In this respect we have for this woman minister dealing with a bona fide philosopher.

The Denkmalmeißler should ever begin to conserve their tools powerful.

Mental space

Monday, February 10, 2014

Yesterday evening came in friendly talks once again the topic of "morphic fields" on.

I know for certain phenomena simply no better term, I meant.

Against it: The is but one part, established common, not inaccurate, at best it might lie in finding a German. (The one knows exactly how to appeal to me.)

"Form fields"? - Sounds a bit hampered, as the youth politically incorrect well commented.

"Formative fields" I like a little better, but I'm satisfied with it either.

Let us finally in the singular; that alone helps sometimes.

Perhaps the word is already rethinking "field" here. (more ...)

Of Kenaz, Google and the rest

Sunday 02 February 2014

Looking at it runic, once again, so that no one will understand what I'm saying (great camouflage what?), So just fight one aspect of Kenaz against the other.

Namely the knowledge against art.

It seems like as if the knowledge would be completely overpowering; but this is deceptive; the art is in fact more agile.

Also have the most far too narrow and flat heads to begin with all the knowledge as well reasonable and beautiful. If anything, it makes them empty, impotent.

Everywhere there is around, grinning cheekily at, all too often useless.

The Art hinwiedrum drilled to clearly behind the pain Phone.

Hello! Haaalloo! Hey man! (more ...)

Donate

Thursday, January 16, 2014

I have, though often pointed out to me on the way, prompted even, long resisted against it, even to also make a call for donations to support my work.

I hereby therefore jump to the effect on my shadow.

Under the Dotted will continue to stand with every post, what you see now.

————————————————————————————————————-

"Never donation to an organization that lives in a bigger house than you yourself." (AC)

The three of us live on 81 square - for the classroom actually nine less.

Do you have more than 24?

Magnus Goeller - Volksbank Stuttgart - BLZ 600 901 00 - 580 280 13 Kto.

Only the cowardly rabble network?

Thursday 02 January 2014

It wished me already one Lamaist Tibetan monks have withdrawn my skin alive. Sadhu called the. Since I had been up to unspiri for saints and Inspiris.

Just now came a Bulgur - also a nice Nick - and thought that a man of his own'll totally unexpected, pick up.

Where?

For ice cream?

What drives this kind creatures?

The money?

Could be.

But there are still more than enough this kind - basically clear criminal - cowards that will not send the money.

But quite simply a fanaticism that such seemingly safe, expresses itself.

Most such existences are already at the stupidity of selecting their aliases as a fanatic, just not to recognize professionals.

A professional usually called Mia or Rolf or Dagestan. At least Tajikistan. But not Sadhu or bulgur. My experience. Depth Psychology to I can save now.

The true professional is insidious, but not necessarily cowardly. It is part of the job now times that he hides his identity. Since nothing special to it.

The fanatic but sees no professional job, but a mission already in his code name. He can barely different.

His parallel identity überwallt him quickly. He makes it so neither for money nor even for fun. He demonstrates his already so low excitation threshold, its easy irritability.

He likes himself too much in his power to eject anonymous threats. The probability that he hardly would bring out a word face to face, is almost one hundred percent. His profession and Behuf is Eckensteher.

This does not mean that such Schmalstspurfahrer would not turn the ball from serious professionals forward, to provoke, to explore the terrain, to distract, to tie attention of the target person, so to speak, to keep contact with the enemy.

Quite possible, therefore, that you stick Sadhus and bulgur as Spring fools.

It binds so forces can attack all the more unsuspected elsewhere. At least then the usual plan.

Much more than threats and curses, curses, these shadow warriors of no just sad shape then but usually not on it, and know the pros also. Particularly, to enable such attacks strengthen the vigilance of the target person still, their defense therefore able to still strong.

That is why professionals do not work like the fanatical idiots. Although the are free, they notice almost never what, are so soherum harmless, but they address it quickly damage, obstruct completely unconscious paths.

It is not particularly intelligent, tamper with the net open with murder fantasies, threats of torture and deprivation of liberty. This is not only disgusting, it's stupid.

Nevertheless, like a professional who has coverage, with such a means times come up as a test. Simply safely test the reaction. Whether the other but nervous.

The professional will, of course, quite different than the fanatics who have studied the sore points of the target person. The in view, whereupon they start, where they are most likely to lead on Glatteise.

I could now call me four or five points. But I will not do, because even the classmate of my sons and their schoolmaster or rector could read here. They need not even know about yet.

In reality I have of course at least eight very weak points. Which I know but all the more, the more they attacked. (The ninth is in my expression of weakness, never overcome.)

Yes, sometimes it would almost seem as if the world power to the cowardly rabble Behufe been invented alone.

But even this appearance is deceptive.

2014 as in the coming Yottajahren

Thursday, December 26, 2013

Now even a minimal positive views of the year 2014th

For the horse-dealer in the network could crack a tough year.

I mean first not Facebook, Apple, Google, NSA & Cie.

There are paid submarine hacks in the forums, there are especially those "alternative" Pages that an increasingly adult audience confronted, the only right and still looks just the gift horse in the mouth.

Although more and more money is for the cyber armies, working with text and videos, with commentary and denigration, output, you do not sleep, refines the decomposition and disinformation methods, the disavowal of pages and authors, but it looks but not look, such as whether they made too much progress in this area. On the contrary.

Where to conduct its own pages, aims to provide an interactive communication, usually sinnigerweise must, therefore, allow comments, because you are exposed as a rule, at least by some success occurs through censorship made as soon as really critical questions arise.

And if you are now already great among the little ones, then speaks the already very fast around. Let's see who will earn the title himself in 2014 to be the "alternative TIME", as those publication that censored at three stupid test.

Censorship in "alternative" media comes of course from genuine ideological reasons masse before. Then there are but special religious and esoteric and somewhat sparkling sides, rather no major platforms.

A lot exposure as could take place without GPS Schmerzphonortung without account number along with fingerprint, simply by way of the called honesty. The youngest of all the virtues, as it identifies Nietzsche's Zarathustra.

A orderd Text is reported if not ordered in the sense that a Dostoijewski can keep his gambling addiction only by delivery of continuations of his story in the newspaper about viable to recognize very quickly as only one such. At least then a text string.

How many professional trolls will you probably employ worldwide?

No idea.

But the really good one has, depending on the quality scale, at most a few thousand.

The rest can usually not much more than those who simply beyond the normal programs, so practically by itself, work.

The problem for a top troll or its customer is that he must indeed deliver at some point results, orders may accept only after preliminary examination, rather declines when he knows that he here, even with a lot of hard work, even suddenly hard on the nose fall or even could be pushed to the brink of what happened, too negligently put his reputation on the line.

Indeed, it is quite so that experienced Mitforisten, nor do under the umbrellas of a skilled administrators from a troll in a class at the end of a relative buffoon, yet is without this previously noted its voltes and appeals to the best spice the debate beiziehend with Plaisir.

Who do you need, what you need, as a troll in a class?

Basically you need one, which it almost does not exist. He was supposed to be at best an apparent and an excellent scholar who knows more and so to pose as a bit goofy if necessary, on a linguistic as on the level of content that does not realize yet the Gewitzteste. Cervantes was something. He had, however, not only studied, but fencing also lost an arm against the Turks and then already learned as a young man in captivity in Algiers under the daily life danger. It does not matter. To my knowledge, it is so or not so available.

There are also 2014 not decide any case bits and bytes.

This applies anyway, at least, for the coming Yottajahre.

The thing in itself as a noun

Tuesday, December 17, 2013

A few days ago I saw through a text, a homework assignment of a high school student, but in some strange unique nouns were lowercased; but right on the head suggested to me that the third or fourth time are also to be the word "thing" was affected by the reduction in the free state, whereupon it occurred to me spontaneously, laughing, that surely "thing" the größtzuschreibende word all great ascribe Pronunciations for words must be.

Also my protege understood and laughed with.

"Thing" is so to speak the noun itself.

Maybe deserves "thing" to be as important as a thing.

But not determined greater.

Gerhard Mersmann year plan view 2013

Monday, December 16, 2013

The special Year in Review, probably better year plan look, I found earlier on Dudes page where it "The Power and the bill" the excellent article linked below - the title could hardly be better chosen - by Gerhard Mersmann zweitpubliziert.

I commented at Mersmann so:

"I have way here through Dudes page and will now first here to express my appreciation. The article, refreshing and just kept on point, however linguistically very articulated, appears, certainly deliberately, waiving examples and Détails.
I especially like the summary conclusion, in which the reality of life is placed against the run mystification.
Plane for the first time on this site, I'll look around here now more accurate. The above post, I will certainly recommend to my blog and link, but probably with its own, worthy of forming Anmoderation and two or three own observations to it. This can therefore still take a bit (at least until later in the evening).
LG "

And the Dude:

"I have just spoken Gerhard Mersmann on his blog my appreciation.
A crisp text, indeed, you realize the masterpiece. Relentlessly to the point. And with a clear, elegant style with which pervades the whole post next to its contents as another thread.
Hats off. "

http://form7.wordpress.com/2013/12/12/die-makes-and-the-schein/comment-page-1/#comment-805

A longer quote from the text itself, the penultimate section:

"We saw (we saw us last year from our own eyes -. Note from me) the differences of the monetary and spiritual wealth. And we saw the development of the expansion of the monetary prosperity and the tendency of the spiritual well-being. The increased nearly comprehensive digitized timing of our work processes would namely exposed from the entire ideological nonsense of autonomy and identified as what it actually is: the expansion and perfected control, the liquidation of any self-determination and the inquisitorial persecution of free will. It would show how uniform the digitized era has become, where each remote and each sensor lurks a program that standardized and unified. And it would fall from the eyes like the scales that at all Individualisierungsbrimborium only standard stereotypes be tolerated. "

What I see here speaks so much so remarkably concise for yourself that I now first do not want it to comment further, but wants to see counted as a Lockschnipsel which may bring as many readers on the page of the author, the total reading there to . enjoying

So short and clean with so much illusion that is sold to us as normality settled!

A real treat.

An essay, which I will present many Pappenheimer, of both the sake contents and to linguistic teaching purposes.

Terms, runes, logic and "Divine Source" (II)

Tuesday, December 10, 2013

Terms are not given to man. Originally certainly did not.

Yes: The child will be given words, approximate terms. Sometimes beaten into.

Well, a rabbit is a rabbit, regardless of whether the Spaniard just calls him liebre.

Terms but as "love", "freedom", "virtue" ...: All abstract terms only by a whole network of other concepts to concepts associated with them.

The mature thinker can be seen almost because he always cautious skepticism is facing this, because each one weighted differently in different cultures, they are in completely different concept braids.

So abstract concepts are time and again to question yourself.

Friedrich Nietzsche was not only like no other recognized, but also showed obvious.

Whether one doing a "Divine Source" is able to help? Perhaps. If faith once again not sit there mountains where there are none.

But a good resource on this cruise by human thought and feeling are all the runes. They are namely faith as little to do as a lame jakutisches Reindeer on the run with a Friedrich Schiller, when the place just to his sublime verses.

As German we have the great advantage that our language is a lexically very transparent. The word families are so umfässlich as a rule logically stable. This also helps in the detection of semantic fields.

And in the creation of meaningful new terms. In the evaluation of terms. Just read Nietzsche's Zarathustra.

English in this respect, compared with the Germans, a mean disaster. Everything is buzzing somehow messed up, often very disjointed, unconnected, opaque. Maybe that's why, each English. Or should at least speak English. At least passably.

Here also belongs on this page have variously set forth observation that educated people who are really good at English (inalsoweit the possible), to include in their spoken and written German much less English fashion concepts and brain crack as "downloaded" etc., as the plebs in politics, the media and advertising industries as well as teenagers who know still no longer set of content to formulate clean.

It's not about "purity" of the German language. Language develops. It's about them not graus to distort, to make mischief and Suelz and Halblug the guiding principle of his own speech.

A baguette is a baguette, a pizza is a pizza, and may have even become a model of the mannequin. What does it matter. I also like to drink a cappuccino times. Rather than a Broken Chino anyway. Chutzpah, Schmock and meschugge belong to my applied vocabulary.

But I'm just not intentionally ridiculously down. Just like other people. Tool-free underperformers. I do this in most of satire and cabaret. As part toward something.

Terms, runes, logic and "Divine Source"

Monday 09 December 2013

Yes, I love words.

What I do not like is when terms are made to smoke candles.

No, I will not talk of "tolerance" of "Europe", of "freedom of speech" and the like today.

With the so-called "spirituality" I'm through.

Suppose we now look at "Divine Source" before.

Since it always bubbles out, quite pure, divine even.

The thing therefore is self-explanatory. Whoever then around it referred to as just the ramblings ramblings, thus demonstrating one hundred percent that he is either a stubborn, unholy gate, or just a bad guy.

First time but I do not know where the "The" is coming.

Why there should be only one divine source? Must it be so? Why?

And why "source"? Could it not be a divine volcano that donates not constantly water (which is the obvious association with "source"), but from time to time spewing fiery primal energy?

Or a divine air pump? The will be drawn?

Or a divine Erdschleuder? She wants to be stretched?

A divine Ätherodrom?

And why "divine"? Why not Urquelle? Why not the original source? - Sounds to me at least grippy, less verschwurbelt.

Yes, less verschwurbelt so less spiri less eso, less effective in soul fish.

The original would still prefer it. You could explain that this is not the Rindviech is meant more educated yes.

And again would rather have the "Ha!". For that is undoubtedly the human Urlaut, Erstlaut.

Oh well. Just not the divine. Which is apparently a gurgling, splashing, hissing. A Fontainieren.

Of course I know that people who love to wallow in lofty terms, have no time for it to reside with logical or even runic trifles. The swollen breasts is important, who wants to be cared for.

Names are Quall and upsetting jaja. That the word "salvation" an emanation of H (a) -Rune is standing for the whole cosmic order, who must know, who cares something.

Yes you have to be to be only just equal to not deal with the various spheres and their associated terms: one has "The Divine Source".

Moreover, one has quantum for several decades. These then came the computer. And because this is a difficult to understand, the other can expect fabulously fast, it now has the "quantum computer", the so about the whole thing should be constantly fed by the divine source, that is not quite the whole: But who keeps have this kind of bumps on?

I.

Oh yes, there it is again, the evil ego. Like as if runes and logic and semantics were not already reprehensible enough. Deibel well.

It is about time that I take off the kid gloves three times again.

Not that I'm still confused with the divine source.

Among the strengths of the German language

Tuesday 03 December 2013

The language of our shared ability to form compound nouns almost any length makes sense, is a not too generous to be output the same wealth, but of inestimable value.

Anyone can, at any time, as required, appropriate form words. Crystal clear.

With a fine speech, but also artisans or in the vernacular that happens constantly, and often unconsciously but usually understood in its specific situation and unerringly.

And again, how often in our syntax, where the brackets of Tunwörtern and their prefixes act, only the back is very essential, which is the previous to the correct level into the light.

The last word part is the generic term. The front parts seem a little like adjunct adjectives or affiliated or enumerative in Wesfall more nouns, but are still much less cumbersome, part of a word, a concept.

An Italian told me in German lessons, after I had submitted one in fact quite dark poem section of Schiller, in which the word sinister itself also seemed and I also declare accordingly and had to distinguish the simpler dark, the German language own by their possible Mitlauthäufung particularly well for displaying darker conditions.

Certainly no wrong, and certainly not a stupid observation, or, more accurately, heard.

On the other hand, operas are today enjoyed singing in German yet except in Italian. No one thinks that this must sound only after the nearby Old Nick.

With the vowels, we must undoubtedly give again and again a little more effort, so do not have to give the Italians, because the buzz vowels, except in dialects, anyway masse through the area, almost no matter what he says.

On the other hand, DC was a Dante saying, I must ask again, unfortunately I failed to write it down or to memorize at least, of course, in old Italian original language, the somewhat different and tighter than usual today, in which besides the Selbstlautanklänge also half alliteration recovered.

Yes, just in German we find what I call half-bars, ie bars, which do not necessarily lie in the initial sound of several words, not even in a starktonigen syllable.

By einbegreifenden sentence structure we have the possibilities and the vocation longer to set-reaching vibration patterns to incorporate the strengths of our language from, where they exist.

Sentence structure is thought structure. Neologism is called draw words.

It goes with the "Wow!"

Sunday, December 01, 2013

I want the people do not annoy my favorite radio station again, so I will not say his name.

A message I send but yet again into the ether.

I can "toll" no longer hear the word.

Differentiated, well-prepared, humorous, often subtle presentation, and then again and again and again: "a great piece", "a great book", "a great concert," etc.

My mind! (Yes, Jochen, now I prefer to say not "My God!")

Remarkably, excellent, excellent, amazing, exceptional, top notch, rich, great, incomparable, super, one-A, chef moderately, outrageous, memorable, twisted, sack heavily, by glowing, angelic, gorgeous, unique, saugeil wasweißichnoch: why only " great "?

Are you mad?

Well, "great" everyone knows, and it has a hard, clear initial sound, and it requires only one syllable.

All this speaks for very great.

Even today's connotation, which is actually the Erstbedeutung. No objection against it.

On the bag it's me but anyway, if I have only "great" listen again and again.

Well, I do not have yes. Can turn off yes.

Toll.

As I write this, it occurs to me that I have neither today nor yesterday as often as usual or even heard the word "great" there.

Maybe there were a mentally-morphogenically inspired me editorial conference at which it was decided to enttollen aware.

The Michel is not a German (III)

Sunday, November 24, 2013

The Michel, as we know him as a symbol of German, not even building a scaffolding to the second floor.

The only area and commandment which he is able to look halfway, is his bed. Perhaps he also finds his beer bottle without it being required of Anglo-Saxon tuition.

The Michel is always "German angst" plagued by the. He could indeed have misplaced his nightcap, did not find his slippers.

In short, he is a Übele joke.

There is enough evil caricatures, not only from war, against us so.

Actually, he lolls around and just babbles in his incomprehensible language something under his breath, but then sometimes meaningless rebellious, and he has just to get again a powerful on the mouth.

More he is not, he has not.

He is most times stupid naughty. Then you fry him again about one, and is well again for a while.

So he is puzzled because in his brain shrinkage in front of him, so he always wonders about the improperly stored in his view of things.

He understands that just will not, why money always grows out of money, he always loses when he does something real.

In his half-baked world, yes, in which work did pay off.

Not just for money's sake, that it not so important, but pleased him both that well the created Caution'd met with, if only the incentive sake of others, even the righteousness sake, and whether perhaps thereat extended capabilities and resources, yet to create better.

Here, after all, not to starve.

No, Michel, for which I am currently writing is, not Michel.

He likes hot or Rudolf or Randolf Rainer.

Or Friedrich Heinrich or Hermann or.

Even still he is named William.

Michel but he does not.

The Michel is not a German (II)

Sunday, November 24, 2013

I do not want more of the various functions of the Archangel Michael, as they were assigned to it by Judaism, Christianity and Islam, kidney expediency here.

At least most of them have with the German national character, it wofern one is seen from the outside at least, it is permitted to see one from the inside at least one negative to do little to nothing.

Just look at trying out phrases to the vernacular.

"I'm not the Michel!"

"Want me to make your Michel?"

"Find yourself another that makes you the Michel!"

The Michel is therefore a good-natured Depp, one which can be exploited exorbitantly, a relish getriezter servant or slave.

Dozy, always a little confused, helpless, stupid.

Nationals even incapable of thought.

Well: Be this image sunk until today.

It is also not altogether inaccurate. Aspects are permitted.

But since only show the negative aspects.

Not only the spirit of invention is lacking, and the desire for freedom, the creative joy, the philosophy, the courage and bravery. The fracturing, the weigher as the adventuring. And more.

Therefore, I will break even this.

I do not know exactly how, along which name.

Perhaps there are three names, or else it is none, rather than Michel.

Who wants to continue Micheln that will do that.

For me it has ausgemichelt itself.

Anyway, for a long time now but again very different.

————————————————————————————————————–

Of course I know that so does not break a picture overnight.

Anyway, usually: if not done quite extraordinary.

Somewhere out there is but one, perhaps even some who understand what I posit why I accreting it.

And if not first, so I'll just continue alone.

Moment: Jochen seems to have understood me already in the first article, at least to a considerable extent.

The Nachwuchse (number zero)

Sunday, November 17, 2013

I ask you a few you should listen.

Let's not drift into the Heinrich-von-Kleist-hole you.

So that you, knowing exactly to your place volatile work, and around the Minden Celebrations seeing desperate, even to commit suicide goes.

If it all did too bad, then you withdraw for a while. But not for long.

Meanwhile thinks that everything good created is also good there. Even if your do it yourself no longer see.

Does not fit you. Not flatten you. That would be the beginning of the real end.

Ask yourself, rather, more precisely where your more precisely, at the right time and at the right places, can be much more accurate and sharper. Or sometimes just a little cloudy when the situation requires it. Will hard.

Will this water when brutal beatings come, will air when you seeks to take your breath away.

Will Earth when the rest it needs, when first there is nothing to say.

Will fire and ether, if it applies at points.

Will simply everything.

Everything is within you, so you can be there also.

Holt council. Yes. But pays attention so well on the limitations, the inherent intentions of the Guide. Weigh.

Your language is entirely your language. Corrects, improves, where your einseht that she was wrong. Let them make you but no one simply maggoty.

Where not put forward against your content more essential, they will start right there.

Her you would have so expressed inaccurate.

In this Anwurfe if unjustified act at least three stratagems.

Think about it, what.

Today, not from Depp Stan: Again aphorisms

Sunday, November 17, 2013

No, today I'm in a good mood to gebührlich pour the Freemasons and other secret societies one. The must wait. Even the psychiatrists and their drugs and devices.

Yes: It goes back to the issue of aphorisms.

That there is this strange text Zipfel, Textpfitzel at all, is already the least known, or even relevant.

Why you want to know of this little Textteufelchen so little?

Are we approaching the time thing.

That no one knows exactly what is an aphorism, because it is not safe. This is self-explanatory.

That there would be no good aphorisms, because it can not be also.

It can not be that people who constantly novels of Mankell Olsen or read, or at least Grisham, had no time for reading aphorisms.

And also people who prefer Schiller and Dostoijewski read: self would have enough time for it.

To some it may appear bleak; but only many.

The point is that aphorisms, aphorisms good, genuine aphorisms, always have something subversive in itself.

There is more question, because there would be solution.

Aphorisms can not just read, alswie a scamp or Narcissus and Goldmund.

With eager pleasure and Magenstreicheln.

It takes longer to build up to it.

You have to ask yourself.

It was never too much into fashion.

You can Moliere (yes, poor accent grave missing me just too stressful to even introduce) weglachen even Shakespeare: A good aphorism laughs you do not just go away.

Either you can ran the brain Kastl, or you can prefer.

That's why I love the Lichtenberg's aphorisms: Nietzsche and wrong actions.

In a very deep sense of good aphorisms are Chinese and my stratagems used.

Do I even explain? Rhetorical question. No.

There are competitions in shock seal number ("Slam Poetry"), in comedy ("comedy"), in each of the already naming ago - just not here - Anglo-Saxon besatztem nonsense.

How do I here's probably already beschrub: I was already teutschlichst made that easier to sell manure - so what the worth at least as fertilizer - because aphorisms.

It was at one of my most recent birthday, and the main protagonist of such prose was a real canteen today's variety, so one who really understands what the Sell in how this society.

Well, then we just laugh.

This is best done.

Line.

So little, as we perceive even the real new stories (these show a deep relationship, you realize my words: and I myself have not yet submitted a), we observe more often the corresponding aphorisms.

So it's not just the lack of receivers. The stations are not enough under power.

Yes, stupid aphorisms that can not be planned.

They can not even looking.

In precisely the same in their Unaufgelöstheit enough not even necessarily a brainstorm.

The if comes, will be then also placed on the hip or doubt Dreifel or Wasweißichwasfel.

Then it gets, sometimes, a great aphorism.

But usually it is a long-cherished idea of ​​so condensed.

And yet unfinished.

This is too much for the masses.

Aphorisms, Lehrertum, Beautiful

Thursday, November 14, 2013

Today I tried a young man who did not even know the word aphorism, in the last ten minutes of teaching, as I came across it to explain what aphorisms constituting what are the things for oblique.

This is because you would not know myself really knows a difficult 'thing.

After a few thumb of land and notes helped me, what wonderful, actually Georg Christoph Lichtenberg, well, not exactly out of trouble, but to still attainable.

The delineation of proverbs, for short satire, a scarce treatise or essay, a rater observation was as good as this time and at all possible, well done and understood.

In such moments I experience again by simply breaks out of me, so I not only like to write, but probably not for nothing taken the teaching profession have.

Deibel well.

Maybe I need to still be Minister of Education.

24 25 26 Next Page: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ... 24 25 26 Next