Also from current events, I find myself required to include the copyright issue again.
Anyone who is interested in it, we ask, especially this post also to look as though I must repeat here some content, but not all, and especially in others, (some) less emotional, expressive form.
The same applies to this product .
And of course, the most recent , which obviously has still not made any sufficiently clear what, what is at stake here for a dimension.
I'm easy to get started now times and quote the Dude estimated from the comment string to "policy-news.net steals Göllers Full Text" :
"Dude says:
21, September 2011 at 01:05 (Edit)
@ Magnus
In principle, I support the dissemination of good, sound objectively and correctly worded articles, reader comments, forum posts, etc. always, but only in strict compliance with the basic rules, which actually naturally should give every respect and healthy, honorable sense.
So if the content worthwhile and rhetorically readable clear - with the author's name and direct link to the source, full length (or with the appropriate identification, it is merely excerpts) - on other platforms gecopypasted (sorry ;)) is, this is absolutely to support my opinion, firstly because it saves time and energy that z.Bsp. could be used for productive activism, and second opposing the abundance of common, brainwashed Meinungsgeschwurbels, even if I can here your points listed in the article thoroughly comprehend and understand.
I admit offizielll here, I do this every now and then even unasked with your articles - and also some other things - but ALWAYS mention your (or the relevant) name and direct link to the article in your blog (or the corresponding source) just as I clearly characterizes "[...]", if I take only excerpts (Many people are too lazy to read for too long article, but you know that already ;)).
If I should fail to do so in future, I will of course keep me in mind.
What's on the policy-news-diebesgesindel.nwo.com expires is the longer, the more ridiculous and should (and will!), So no quick apology received by you are also rewarded accordingly (I already have some creative ideas to whiz through the head ;)). "
This sounds at first quite good and reasonable and responsible.
But only at first (forgive me, dear Dude, I must for the sake of the thing to be clear).
Because it can, even if my - or any other - texts are correctly reproduced and linked if any personal or commercial interests associated with it (and who is?) When all around not just louder loathsome filth is, no pictures around it or even inside mounted be contrary to the intentions of the author, in short, if it just another "best" for this run, but its vital interests (including its motivation and self-esteem, but they are anyway no matter) fundamentally ignored.
Because if this, often - as in my case - all anyway free will to power (otherwise, there is still no reasonable argument), his work gets not even honored by the fact that he naming plus a link a the reader interesting appearing contribution also necessary requests draws on his side, he expressly maybe at least you can get some advertising revenue, increase its reach, so that its classification at stores like alexa and google, perhaps even a paid writing or teaching on land draw, while, conversely, the thief that page appreciates, so that fact for themselves and achieved them: then and therefore stops any fun.
Even in that rare, almost hypothetical "best" case.
And the argument that it is so time consuming to properly cite or set the beginning of the text to read on, in my view is not only unacceptable but downright outrageous.
There must of arms, otherwise employed (with what? With moneymaking? With any actions for any need other or else?) Illegal Kopist, the arms, but actually maybe a minute (be it a go two or?) Tuned to give his high holiness more for a text that he considers worth spreading.
This can of course as an author who wrote his text in tenths of seconds, all he had to learn in order to be able to this, has collected in seconds of his life, of course not expect.
He must also live on nothing, yes. And his children, certainly not. (more ...)
