From current events, I see myself requires the inclusion of copyright laws again.
Anyone who is interested in this, I ask, especially this post also to look at, because I have to repeat here, although some content, but not everything, and especially in the other, (partly) less emotional, expressive form.
The same applies to this product .
And of course, the most recent , which obviously has still not made any sufficiently clear what, what is at stake here for a dimension.
I make my entry times now easily and quote the estimated Dude from the comment string to "politik-news.net steals Göllers Full Text" :
"Dude says:
September 21, 2011 at 01:05 (Edit)
Magnus
In principle, I support the dissemination of good, sound and factually correct formulated products, reader comments, forum posts, etc. always, but only in strict observance of the principles which actually naturally should give every respect and healthy, honorable sense.
So if the content worthwhile and rhetorical readable clear - the name of the author, and a direct link to the source, full length (or with the appropriate identification, it is merely excerpts) - on other platforms gecopypasted (sorry;)), this is absolutely to support my opinion, firstly because it saves time and energy that z.Bsp. could be used for productive activism, and secondly counteracts the abundance of the widespread, brainwashed Meinungsgeschwurbels, even if I can choose your items listed here in the article quite comprehend and understand.
I admit offizielll here, I do this every now and then unasked with your articles - and also some other - but ALWAYS with the names of your (or of the) name, as well as a direct link to the article in your blog (or the corresponding source) just as I clearly characterizes "[...]", if I take only extracts (Many people are too lazy to read too long articles, but you know already;)).
If I have to refrain from doing so in the future, I will keep me in mind of course.
What there on the politik-news-diebesgesindel.nwo.com expires is the longer, the more ridiculous and should (and will!), So no quick apology received by you are also rewarded accordingly (I already buzzing to some creative ideas through the head;)) ".
That sounds pretty good at first and sensible and responsible.
But only at first (forgive me, dear Dude, I must own sake are clearly).
Because it can, even if my - or any other - texts are correctly reproduced and linked if any personal or commercial interests associated with it (when is that?) When around it not only louder disgusting filth is, no pictures around it or even inside mounted are contrary to the intentions of the author, in short, if it just yet "best" for this is ok, but its vital interests (also the motivation and self-esteem, but they are anyway not matter) fundamentally ignored.
Because if this, often - as in my case - everything anyway free will to power (otherwise, there is still no reasonable argument), his work gets not even honored by the fact that he naming plus a link a the reader interesting appearing contribution also necessary Hits pulls on his side, he hereby perhaps can at least achieve some advertising revenue, increase its reach so its classification at stores like alexa and google, perhaps even pull a paid writing or teaching on land, while conversely the thief that page appreciates, so that fact by itself or achieves this: then and thus stops any fun.
Even in that rare, almost hypothetical "best" case.
And the argument that it is so time consuming to properly cite or set the beginning of the text for further reading, in my view is not only unacceptable, but downright outrageous.
There must of arms, usually so busy (with what? With moneymaking? With any actions for any requiring other or else?) Illegal Kopist, arms, but in fact maybe a minute (be it a go two or?) Drangeben his high sanctity more for a text that he considers worth spreading.
One can, of course, as a writer, who writes his text in tenths of seconds, all he had to learn to be more so, collected in seconds of his life, of course, do not expect.
He must also live on nothing, yes. And his children certainly not. (more ...)
