A Hessian FDP parliamentary candidate has the Greens covered if their required "Veggie Day" with Nazi comparisons.
This is not particularly original, but it seems the Greens powerful to annoy. Finally, they have so Antideutschtum and thus Nazi comparisons in the genes, while they had to learn only the war and bustle of Upper German-hater Fischer.
"Same Nazis!" - One might as well like to call. Only, this time the opposite side was first to act.
The limits of political conflict herewith are exceeded, it will beep. Since when is that? Have the Greens about a monopoly on decent Nazi comparisons?
You should call the so-called Federal Constitutional Court and can confirm that the superior court, in order that such liberal rabble-rouser can be spent in a neighboring cell Horst Mahler.
After all, they could lead in Karlsruhe argued that there was no proven macro-, women and kinderfeindlichere party in Germany, than they are. Not even the pirates could there really keep up. An intolerable scandal is it when the nachweislichsten all German-hater would have to put up Nazi comparisons.
Finally, this kind of comparisons are explicitly prohibited, while the FDP is first man acquitted of mistake of law. From there, however nothing works.
In addition to the matter was negotiated, whether one may call Arabs enemies as "anti-Semites", or whether this term only to people who had casual, wishing to donate money for the lifting of Israeli "settlers" -Baugruben in the West Bank. The decision Hiezu is postponed for the time being. A language-scientific opinion is to bring clarification. The University of Cologne, a pioneer in gender equality issues is commissioned.
The lead in the process "non-man" Erika Obsurdides-Kalimantour - to be called woman, she rejects as sexist - argued that Hitler, with his welfare and his vegetarianism, only perfidious've tried the Green movement to infiltrate even before they arise : This is followed by the FDP-Nazi now hang on.
The court summoned to Hitler in this context can not be prosecuted for sedition, not only because of his could not get hold of, he probably no longer live, but also because, as submitted to it no certified copy of a membership card of the Green, "according to the court, not intentional, low motivation in the direction to incite the people against the green party, present, and therefore the defendant can not be prosecuted."
It is, of course, outraged. Each GrünIn would of course like to see confirmed as Urerzfeind Adolf Hitler, and now the Hitler. So did nothing done against the Greens. A colossal error of judgment, which can appear very sinister the BVG.
Still staggering ". The court can not generally, only occasionally to decide, just as there is no credible original statements to the green party are assignable by Adolf Hitler, from when are Nazi comparisons on the floor of the Basic Law, hereby casual" But, or . and: "The obvious fact that the Green Party wants to exterminate the entire German people alsomit, is in the best anti-fascist tradition, she makes in the political debate does not automatically sacrosanct. The declared eradication will could also be a mere lip service, must therefore may be questioned in such a sharp manner. "
Now see the Greens rather old. The SNB has first spoken. So just before the election still hold a Ausrottungsvereidigungsparteitag, no, it can even prevent the agitators easily. Especially since you do not even know if the SNB can be influenced decisively by such a step could.
Thus, consoles himself with the Greens for the time being in tofu and champagne so that one at least was not banned as Nazi undead party, the Nazis from the BVG would eventually even be trusted even been that these fascistic night watchmen.
Two hundred and twenty percent in the Bundestag! -: This is the new bold slogan of "root-out folks". (At a German term could be not to some as too unclear, also implicit in the suspicion of treason for a good cause.)
A storm in a glass so. Time that we as Green not only rumpfitzt, but once again applauded an attack of the Allied war godfather.
