It went to Salamanca, over twenty years ago, when I still naughty student.
I learned at a bar a man of perhaps forty years, with whom is immediately relaxing a philosophical conversation. (more ...)
It went to Salamanca, over twenty years ago, when I still naughty student.
I learned at a bar a man of perhaps forty years, with whom is immediately relaxing a philosophical conversation. (more ...)
It is not mine to judge here, how much I am good as a philosopher. But I presume to me to say that there is a veritable philosopher in the German language space at least. Because it is unlikely that a reader Lisa has fooled me for so long and in reality but a man.
Yes, Lisa, so you have to live now, me too, who knows who thereat laughs at me, that I so now outside. But I wrote it not here, I would not be very sure you verkraftest that. And do not take as flattery. There is none. It's about another. Not only about what is in the next sentence, which will capture most fairly easily.
For me personally, your work is a liberation. Not only because my wife was not just the stupidest bugged me for years the chatter of other men, women are not fit to philosophy, just not designed for that. I was never able to identify a reasonable, even compelling reason.
Why should a woman can not think in depth, want?
And it is rare (how often it is because in men?), Why not?
How anzitiert below, I recommend an article published today Article by Karen Horn on faz.net , which I also anriete upper secondary schools and university faculties corresponding to the basic reading, because it delivers what it promises in headline and opening credits:
"Libertarian paternalism
Slaveholders of the future
11.03.2013 · The libertarian paternalism knows what is good for man. He acts for the benefit of citizens and bring them to the right path. Superficially, this model develops enormous charm - in fact it is an attack on freedom.
From Karen Horn "
In all that remains to criticize the FAZ undoubtedly sharp: For some time, so even with this post, the newspaper has clear again placed at the top of the so-called "quality media" (which I'm good reasons mostly "sheep media") ,
You seem to have grasped the Lower Main, that you have to offer its readers more than politically correct Geblürb, do not go the way of Rundschau and other one. (more ...)
Manner is one of his grown findings from umfässlicher life experience with precise thinking, sensitivity, an enormous powers of association, a sharpened art sense and intuition as to bingen in accordance able that he can meet both far-reaching and profound statements about general human issues, as examine and assess by analog capture him as yet has come under things and their gear. His knowledge of human nature and effortless fluency enable him here, so to give others the right time Council that he understood effective. He never thinks lightly rather not, hears in his insatiable curiosity, his infinite appetite for further knowledge, never to learn and even things that already appear clear a thousand times, again and again to question and think through.
A good teacher never sits down completely. A good teacher can learn and together with his students.
For him they are not only accessories, cattle, paying customers, plasticine. You are his companions.
A good teacher encourages the student's own thinking, invites him to a contradiction. He does not want dumb replicant, audio tapes on two legs.
Neither teachings still learning all the time consist only of joy and pleasure. Some things have to work hard, sanded and polished until clarity that sparkles in the sun for long.
A teacher who has indeed captured all the essentials of an object that account no longer prepared to the effect itself ever further to learn how this represent respectively detected, no good.
Nietzsche believed in him as a teacher of Greek in Basel the laziest were still hard. He had never must impose a penalty.
Confucius shows that he taught according to each student. "D en route that does not exist!" Especially in teaching! To hell with all systematists, with all methods faithful teachers! (more ...)
That the sadness the antonym for happiness, is common.
But we now writes the happiness in comparison with the sadness unfair unilaterally superior creative inspiration source.
Unquestionably can happiness liberating to work for the physical and spiritual forces juices; who bestritte that; the sadness is this compared to today but repute me too bad.
Because sadness, as a kind of contraction, just too concentration, the return to the essentials, a bridge to a deeper, more detailed knowledge can timely, so that a gegründeterer, even new starting point for creating and nature arises from this.
Often arise from the widest ideas. (Cervantes only mentioned as an example.)
It can be said definitely that only the mature a philosopher, a sage who it consciously recognized and taken advantage of.
The sadness and form can mean that plummet into his own soul, and in that of others, which explores the spirit of gravity only really herewith, conversely, can discover those of the ease prepares for flight.
So blessed be the conscious, awake sadness! Yes, even the dejection, good stretch it to higher and healing powers!
So the sadness is a Check, sometimes even an ordeal.
Like the nightmares of which I recently wrote what she a relative of, it is better to sometimes willing to accept: as far as just allow the instantaneous forces.
Each sadness is equal to physical pain also, a warning and a hint. (more ...)
I have now times the Wikipedia entry on "Osho" (older than Baghwan yet known) inveigled and came across at the end the following passage:
'Osho was increasingly hostile to, especially after the relocation of the commune in Rajneeshpuram of homosexuality and homosexuals. He took the view that homosexuals were created on the basis of their "perversion" AIDS. '
"Homosexuals Should be givenName different localities. They can live in Their Own world, in Their Own Way, and be happy, But They Should not be allowed to move into the resist society, spreading all kinds of dangerous viruses. "
"Homosexuals should be given their own localities. They can live in their own world, in their own way, and be happy, but it should not be allowed them to move into the wider community, spreading all kinds of dangerous viruses. "
At the request of homosexual sannyasins way to explain his negative attitude towards homosexuals, he reiterated his rejection as follows:
"As a homosexual, you are not even a human being [...]. You have come from dignitiy. "
"As a gay man You're not even a human being [...] You lost your dignity." '
Oha. (more ...)
Who wants to be a full-ideological edge: UG Krishnamurti read.
(I mean the UG. Not the other Thanks again, James, that you give me his core font "No Way Out" mitbrachtest, for the hours that we were disputing about the beers.)
It is certainly not easy to recognize what he is wrong, what is missing.
Not for small children. Really, what for advanced nutcrackers.
I spoke with the title " aliens? Rabble, rabble, rabble! "it (I am asking those interested to observe the local comment line) to ensure that all hierseienden aliens only" sneaky Gesocks, low rabble, cowardly vermin "might be, and cried, not necessarily expecting that many participants would find , by inciting to fathom it were a little competition, which is why I come to this harsh judgments.
(Read Thomas's question, whether will apply in the NWO hell market economy or socialism, the occupant latter as cheap einschätzend, tipped the scales that were, Gambling, crossed the finish line.)
So we put the case that, as claimed by believers commonly, several varieties aliens hovering here, more physical, perhaps, that is to say, at least in fashion, even "Transdimensional". And it (but it is irrelevant to this discussion, whether "Transdimensional" here) give it quite a few very maliciously evil, just wanted to reprogram the human race (possibly also genetically), exploit, enslave armies to which Behufe However, other hinwiederum which are quite right dear.
Those loved ones who - often argued about as by Lisa reader and reader Dude - were doing there intervene only want to get at least reveal / may / may, if "humanity", after all sufficiently humanity so well developed that it would make sense because, to put it bluntly: Blödel should be allowed to be Blödel until they are no more of you.
Speak against this common line of argument at least two important things. (more ...)
To become what one is, it is necessary, what wonder, since this is a paradox of two opposing, normally exclusive efforts, more precisely, a huge effort and a tremendous effort not.
On the one hand hardest work, concentration, and that the brain is smoking, on the other hand, the acquisition of a dream almost blissful serenity.
If both together properly, so grows back real confidence. So: The core itself is starting to sound again.
Now the phase dubious deals starts. Business, social, sexual nature. Easy to do now the biggest mistakes. It will once again seduced. (more ...)
The idea that you can be reincarnated somehow has something tempting, which need not be explained in more detail.
Therefore faith is it also so popular.
I know all pertinent models but that is the evil mind, debt-based.
To the effect that you just only in appearance would get a fresh start, as all previous life would bring into the new determinant, especially since all the debts, the debt the negative karma, one might call it what you will, with.
Not a very enticing prospect for me. Since me the price demanded for Life Again May is too high. (more ...)
Whether it was the better, I do not know.
Some but suggests that the danger of overloading by the speed of the manifold spiritual recording is actually grown.
I'm not talking about that which daddelt at his computer into delirium; I speak of the best.
By those who, though they carry things very deeply with yourself and think through spiritual but are on the day a thousand places. The consumed power.
I think it is now a complete illusion, perhaps a fatal, something like a vacation could remedy this problem. Or a relaxation seminar. Or else a penance.
Only seems to me a kind of autogenous Sichfreimachens in every day life, the fundamental thinking, to develop a salutary effect.
Do what is necessary somehow remain active always the most important. And may also adjourn the latter times.
The already always have everything under control, do not understand one anyway; whose advice is usually only poison. (more ...)
Oh, I forgot to mention yesterday that the 13 is a lucky number among the Germans. Whether the influence on the course of the new year, but I can not tell you.
At least we should even half not exclude the tolerance to us.
Or 2013 will be the year of masochists?
Is Sadomasochistieren exchanges and Gewinst?
It may also be that the Great enema kömmt. (more ...)
I imagine a realm in which the philosophers offer the natural philosophers stand up.
That may be a naive idea. Maybe it does not. Or at least not well.
Nevertheless, I like the idea. How well would be THE? (more ...)
About ohngefähr period of 15 years, I was thinking again and again to K. I after we experienced and accomplished together including a few not at normal cooking things had lost sight (because women were at least partly to blame, but not alone) ,
Finally, I gave the network its phone number, I called him a few days ago.
His old self. I heard him, he spoke to me, told from the meantime, just as if no time had passed. (more ...)
While in the comment string to "To relax: A small Crowley-Lug ", but rather in response to" Beuys' concept of art: A Settlement "wrote reader Lisa the following:
"Supposedly you can not define what art is. I, for one, have defined it, and - of course this is only true for me - is art in any form is a statement which goes beyond what is already known, detects new aspects of man, describes or represents and expresses in any form. Seen in the technical inventions were the most important art in the 20th century for me. But technology and science as art is of course controversial. "
The second part from "Seen ..." I will not discuss here first separately, but it leads to the completeness and half of its weight still on with.
So let us pull the core out of the definition: "Art in any form is a statement which transcends over the already known, detects new aspects of man, describes and expresses in some way."
My only suggestion is to go first to remove the duplication, either: ". Art in any form is a statement which transcends over the already known, detects new aspects of man, describes and expresses"
Or: "Art is a statement about what has been also known, detects new aspects of man, describes and expresses in some way."
I do not want to decide first because, especially Lisa decide which version they prefer, even if it is the original, redundant.
Rather, I wonder if there could be missing something important. (more ...)
"For pure will, unassuaged of purpose, is every way perfect."
The above is a quote from memory that "Liber Al" that Aleister Crowley (or its Herunterkanalers), but it might be true.
I'm trying times on a new translation: "For pure will, unerweicht of purpose is allwegs perfect."
So what primitive for such grandiose lies!
In willing himself always puts a purpose, a goal, a pre-Exempt, as a desirable Hinge Featured, Erachtetes! (more ...)
Earlier it was there: the temptation to corruption.
It had long been dammed, that I would take apart the concept of art of Joseph Beuys once thoroughly.
Now it was just Lisa zuspielte me the ball.
Not only do they have often interesting thoughts here introduced; it also seems to be a woman, and I'm so old-fashioned, maybe just live to know that I do not like antrete hard against the idea of women.
Dear me, it would have been, in fact, my friend R., who is on her line, or another, would have thrown me here Beuys on the table.
But it would be cowardly, corrupt been to take the ball is not in accordance with, just because he was playing me of a (putative) wife, I have for some sympathy next Attention to the field.
Maybe I was not surprised, never talked her a word to me.
This is certainly not what I want.
But: If I had to submit this fear?
Am I not first of all the truth, wisdom, as I see it, has assigned? (more ...)
Reader Lisa wrote earlier in the comment Strange to " From the believer addiction ", inter alia, what prompted me to Riposte following:
"You can argue about Beuys' art, but I agree with his statement that everyone is an artist, too."
"@ Lisa
I forgot even Beuys and the concept of art.
I mean, the man has dished out a shudder bullshit.
Not only does it in her imaginary, inflated Do not fired countless Tinker and weak Maten us to steal the last of the day, no, he devalued as the art of what it means socially sustainable as such.
For me, however not a thousandth Gran.
There is hardly anything Boshafteres, Zersetzerischeres to rise as each Krackler, Krattler and scribblers to the artist.
So every little greed, each scabby craving for carrot in the asshole in the Vienna U-Bahn is collected at the Marvel values.
Decadent it almost does not work. Anyway, I find it not easy to an increase.
Does the concept of art in past centuries have been often pulled too tight: THIS is a fatal mischief. (more ...)