From current events, I find myself challenged to take the copyright issue again.
Anyone who is interested in this, I ask, especially this post also to look at, as I must repeat here, although some content, but not everything, and especially in the other, (partly) less emotional, expressive form.
The same applies to this product .
And of course the youngest , who has obviously still not made any sufficiently clear what, what is at stake here for a dimension.
I'm getting started now times easily and quote the Dude estimated from the comment string to "policy-news.net steals Göllers Full Text" :
"Dude says:
September 21, 2011 at 01:05 (Edit)
Magnus
In principle, I support the dissemination of good, sound objectively and correctly worded articles, reader comments, forum posts, etc. always, however, only in strict compliance with the basic rules, which actually naturally should give every respect and healthy, honorable sense.
So if the content worthwhile and rhetorical readable clear - with the author's name and direct link to the source, in full (or with the appropriate identification, so it is merely excerpts) - on other platforms gecopypasted (sorry)), this is absolutely to support my opinion, firstly because it saves time and energy, the z.Bsp. could be used for productive activism, and secondly counteracts the abundance of common, brainwashed Meinungsgeschwurbels, even if I can your items listed here in the article thoroughly comprehend and understand.
I admit offizielll here, I do this every now and then without being asked of all of your articles - and also some other things - but ALWAYS mention your (or the relevant) name, as well as a direct link to the article in your blog (or the corresponding source) just as I clearly characterizes "[...]", if I take only excerpts (Many people are too lazy to read all about long articles, but you know already;)).
If I should fail to do so in the future, I will keep myself understood it.
What there on the politics-news-diebesgesindel.nwo.com expires is the longer, the more ridiculous and should (and will!), So no quick apology received by you are also rewarded accordingly (I already buzzing to some creative ideas by the head;)) ".
This sounds at first quite good and reasonable and responsible.
But only at first (forgive me, dear Dude, I must for the sake of the thing will be clear).
Because it can, even if my - or any other - texts are correctly reproduced and linked if any personal or commercial interests associated with it (when is that?) When around it not only louder disgusting filth is, no pictures around it or even inside mounted be contrary to the intentions of the author, in short, if it just yet "best" for these runs, but its vital interests (including its motivation and self-esteem, but they are anyway no matter) fundamentally ignored.
Because if this, the often - as in my case - everything anyway free will to power (otherwise there is still no rational argument), his work gets not even honored by the fact that he naming plus linking one to the reader interesting appearing contribution also necessary accesses draws on his side, he hereby perhaps can at least achieve some advertising revenue, increase its reach, so that its classification at stores like alexa and google, perhaps even draw a paid writing or teaching on land, while, conversely, the thief that specific page appreciates, so that fact for themselves and achieved them: then and therefore stops any fun.
Even in that rare, almost hypothetical "best" case.
And the argument that it is so time consuming to quote properly or set the beginning of the text for further reading, in my view is not only unacceptable but downright outrageous.
There must of arms, usually so busy (with what? With moneymaking? With any actions for any requiring other or different?) Illegal Kopist, of the arms, but actually maybe a minute (be it a go two or?) Tuned to give his high holiness more , for a text that he considers worth spreading.
This can of course as an author to write his text in tenths of a second, all he had to learn to can this, has collected in seconds of his life, of course not expect.
He must also live on nothing yes. And his children certainly not. (more ...)
