What drives this man?
Is this bad faith, or is possessed?
I'm talking about a prominent blogger who sometimes very perceptive, but partly also things under striking or recklessly omitting that belonged to the matter, in any case always very eloquent, ills of this world denounces it but apparently can not do without it, or can, with NS comparisons, attend.
To put it coarsens to say: Everyone who is now pushed by the rich in poverty, is like a Jew. Auschwitz lives. All over. All the time.
What is the purpose as a means of his approach?
He wants to shake up, shock, just attention?
He wants that whether the comparison no longer dares to contradict him?
He weighs his comparisons at all?
Does the one could against unscrupulous plutocrats only with the Nazi comparisons, no matter how obliquely sitting?
I am very suspicious in this case, because he this part completely warped mischief always very clever (for those needing it) in his otherwise long stretches well comprehensible incorporates considerations, the otherwise quite attest to some surveys.
I'm sorry: I'm suspicious when I see something.
If any tumber goal all the time and especially with Nazi shouting, therefore, so that's a long time nothing special anymore.
But someone builds virtually all text on this comparison and on him hinzielend on, after all, a prominent, very eloquent, but turned him well, so he loses to me in any case again and again credibility.
The man will be helped by me, at least not so quickly.