When estimated Jermain foutre le Camp, there is a nice list of quotes on writing and the writer.
Alone, the Goethe quote, he also chose to title, is not my consent: "The state of the writer the true reader shares immediately with completely."
And it's not because I know how loyal reader, despite its undoubted skills and achievements, no sovereign admirer of Goethe am much do detest what he has done.
The set is from my own experience as along my knowledge of other literary work just is not right.
I write, for example, another episode of German-Südschwitz or by Konstantin Eulenspiegel, or otherwise so much, so is my condition sometimes very far removed from what has been said. He must.
My state may so far affect the progress of each story, a linguistic view, a critique, a social analysis, a treatise, an essay does not automatically mean that this once totally the true reader communicates itself.
Not even to the extent that he is after him and after telling.
Unless, and this may happen, I want it that way.
If this happens unwillingly now just yet, so I'm just not quite Lord of the substance still my style.
More: Meinte Goethe here the state of the writer in general, then this would ever, in each piece, entirely reveal.
Now this would mean that the writer had only a so narrow spectrum of fabrics, perspectives and forms of expression, as it were always just be very specific Restricted. That there may be well, but is certainly not for a literati, which is good for more than getting same yearning love poetry or morbid Short Stories.
Goethe said now the current state of the writer, so this could be true also for only a narrow horizon, in his work entirely on this bound, hereby minden writers.
Apart from the fact "the state" of the writer changes indeed the writing itself; and even this internally changing state is just not where art reigns, at least not fully, reflected in the written word.
- Ads -