Well, so slowly it is more or less officially.
Namely what the cyber spooks the Yanks and Brits with your computer everything can and must. Or they may not about? It's not something about it, so they may also.
http://www.faz.net/aktuell/feuilleton/debatten/ueberwachung/totale-kontrolle-das-nsa-programm-turbine-12844784.html
For example, can you just fiddle around on the hard drive, turn on her microphone and your web camera, even your keystrokes before they ever likely turn to the inefficient coding even think to retrieve.
But that's the least. After fumbling on your hard disk the same time a couple of child pornography can play. Then get your local prosecutor or police a call, then either your computer, and you are supplied.
So think rather just do not believe you could say something to these forces, their principals, some do not want to like.
Because otherwise your waiting just building.
Everyone should be afraid of this pork cheeks. Completely helpless and feel.
It has never been cheaper and easier, any objective person to attach a criminal offense. This may make even rejoice those cranks.
It can, however, to what extent the mind, I do not know, soon come the time when the first judge private and other "seized" no longer recognize hard drives as well as other media as evidence as long as the defendant does not admit even to have them described as , as submitted to the court. In dubio pro reo.
Therefore, the floppy Fracken also want probably not really that many processes, they want especially the psychological terror, the fear, the deterrent.
A decent court can not assert that the defendant should have been better watch on his computer. How? By the NSA and GCHQ the superior technology and superior knowledge would itself need to acquire, so day and night care of your own computer?
These people will still run into walls that are not set up by Prince Potemkin.
And, dear ones: Just as at a me who constantly spits you into the murky broth, it would be particularly credible if you somehow manipulated my computer that I do not, but this and similar rogue introduced inkriminierendes material.
Overdo it so better not join me; You could get it done with a saudummen precedent.
I know how clearly you explain to a criminal defense lawyer that he had to keep his mouth shut whenever I want to, that he has to make no deals, I shoot him cold, before the chamber bring, verzeige himself, if he tried behind my back.
Writing and speaking I can myself: allzumal the legal situation very easy here.
If the court has only disk, nothing else, except maybe weak, put forward by the prosecution constructs and circumstantial evidence, it would be a condemnation not only a miscarriage of justice, a miscarriage of justice, but would have given the facts to the possibility of manipulation, the presented clearly, the total disregarding the presumption of innocence offered are seen itself as a criminal violation of the law in the office, at least, a gross breach of duty of care.
Mind you: the monitoring and manipulation of computers has created millions worldwide; at least heard of the famous "services"; plenty of other clubs also mix with so that the normal computer user can hardly defend; therefore just can not be assumed to be negligible likelihood of criminal manipulation.
Pulls you once you warm on your Spacken. As long as we have no open dictatorship, You'd better not be too sure.
And you should finally have, so it becomes really dangerous for you.
- Advertisement -
Tags: Bescheißmittel
