To me it's only happened a few days ago that I opened a power unknown to me, because I showed my utility that would come from thence hits on my, wanted to see where it came from.
First, some which confused babble, I was appear shortly before pushing away, I saw a picture there, not naked, but showed a girl of about ten years in a costume that suggested Relevant.
I immediately went out. To have the page even considered, would have eventually can be interpreted punishable with every second more, because who only calls as a consciously and deliberately, continues to roll even if he sees something is off. But who knows what is consciously and deliberately?
It was only a borderline image. I have no idea if I had more found there. And yet it would have interested me since had to have been mentioned somewhere on that side of my blog, so I would like to know if this was an unfortunate coincidence, perhaps satirically meant, or whether a laminated Pädopfuhl.
If I had to immediately file charges, without any specific reason? These people einhandeln the biggest annoyance, perhaps wrongly?
To make me so himself suspicious, yes klariter admitted that I had visited such a page?
How long is the legal residence when you see something, even a potentially concerning? What if I have an emergency boot between the side therefore remains open longer than intended? Is there then - for me without warning - soon a search, along with confiscation of all computer and disks, and I can only pray that I do not any of hackers that plague me the last time, or even anyone else to destroy me, nor has put more plays somewhere or does so later?
I am now convinced that our services do quite deliberately not much against the operators of sites where it is much clearer what's going on. (As I said, it was only a dubious image.)
Had I not forbidden to look a bit further if the bandits are really the worst kind, or should I verzeigen same as the Swiss say?
I do not sit already suspected, as I write this?
If I had that Google not only Hitler and Manning grabbed me off in front of the image search, but also one with a half-naked boy at the beach because some moron on the WWW mentioned me somewhere and the picture was going verzeigen?
Who? Google? The author? Both?
And I do not branched, I would then possibly there?
Because if so easily verifiable that I had ever looked more often, especially now that Google just drives me. So I had to stand for the image intentionally. All right?
While the NSA, Google, Facebook, Apple & Cie do what they want, even, not to mention my old friends from the BKA, anyone can because a mouse click drape, even before, when he was "googling" corresponding points in the direction child pornography terms while the Google, which might then leads to corresponding pages, of course keeps a lily blossom white vest.
What a perversion.
- Advertisement -