Yesterday evening came in friendly talks once again the topic of "morphic fields" on.
I know for certain phenomena simply no better term, I meant.
Against it: The is but one part, established common, not inaccurate, at best it might lie in finding a German. (The one knows exactly how to appeal to me.)
"Form fields"? - Sounds a bit hampered, as the youth politically incorrect well commented.
"Formative fields" I like a little better, but I'm satisfied with it either.
Let us finally in the singular; that alone helps sometimes.
Perhaps the word is already rethinking "field" here.
Finally, the man is a field is typically concerned with at least first quite flat before.
And the flat is what I'm talking about, now times not at all.
"Space" were it better.
"Spiritual Space"?
As I see, you have to watch today so that Hugo von Hofmannsthal already mustered this term:
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Das_Schrifttum_als_geistiger_Raum_der_Nation
Good thing.
What a wonderful "coincidence". (I really did not riddled first.)
Not infrequently searches you an idea, and he's just been there.
- Advertisement -
Tags: Hugo von Hofmannsthal
Since there are much nicer things:
gr. μορφή morphé "form", "shape"
amorphous is therefore "informally"
Now see time after what is an anamorphic image!
(So to speak "endomorph")
The optician do the like:
stigma = point
astigmatism = (fuel) Punktlosigkeit
a anastigmatic system avoids the (fuel) Punktlosigkeit
Anonymus
This anamorphic pictures are great art, unfortunately, so out of fashion that it no longer creates today.
Beautifully means the stigmatic point. Therefore must not think further about it that I was stigmatized as mentally ill, is only a point or a patch.
@ Woodcut
First of which is really no more than a point! Whether at an Indian woman on the forehead or (quote WIKIPEDIA :)
Therese Neumann, called Tessa of Konnersreuth (* 8th, 9th, 10th or April 11th, 1898 in Konnersreuth, † 18 September 1962 just there), was a peasant. She is best known alleged stigmata, the 1926 appeared to her.
The points were located in the same places where the Christian religion founder was nailed to the cross.
The fact that people speaks with optically invisible points as mental illness, gay etc. of stigmata, also makes no more than points of it, with the of / appropriate is identified.
This is the "Insane" yes also a veeeery elastic term. Existing Asperger syndrome is now reportedly already setting a criterion for / in the computer industry. Mathematical-Technical giftedness is dismissed as autism, everything for the asylum ... nothing.
The Anarmorphotische figure is mainly known by the CinemaScope process, with the one on the usual 1 widescreen cinema: 1.5 film format introduced. As previously always stood up movie posters in the small print: CinemaScope Super Panorama on Eastman Technicolor! (Please google yourself what is Technicolor and Kodachrome 23 with the development baths)
Anonymous
Had meant here
http://www.perpetuum-mobile.ch/de/produkte/anamorphose-1319.html
or also here
http://www.allroundrow.com/2012/03/beispiele-the-anamorphic-illusion.html
Illustrations are such a thing. In mathematics there is plenty transforming a function into another room. Gottchen the theoretically-incomprehensible.
A very simple process, one turns on a light bulb and it will light. Quite suddenly, a perfectly ordinary light bulb takes about 0.1 seconds for it. This function of the light-, X-axis and Y-axis time, the brightness can be Fourier-transform and then gets on the X-axis and frequencies on the Y-axis, the amplitudes of the respective frequency. If you with your plotting amplitude of the infinitely many frequencies over the time and added together to get the original time-brightness function.
And ... what is the nonsense? Well, sometimes it is easier to expect in such a transformed space, for example in control theory in Laplace space. Then transformed to the function back into the original space-time back then and knows what happened. If the result at the end of the bill is in the original space (brightness over time) again, the calculation is an endomorphic image.
The anarmorphotischen pictures I had specifically written to endomorph, so in the same morphology, ie CinemaScope two-dimensional, bent reality to the film anamorphic and then resist the film bent to the canvas again anamorphic. This is true for the cylindrical and conical mirror pictures, you can see in the photos both representations even side by side on the same film. This also applies to fisheye lenses, but not for the three-dimensional illusions of the second example, the function is not already in people with two eyes in practice, only a photograph (with the one eye of the camera). In addition, the figure is not endomorphic, but the three-dimensional object is mapped to a two dimensional image, based on the effect.
@ Magnus
So far I only mental landscapes were common, as Ekkehard many strong Campi Elysii in the burning fields.