Yes, I love words.
What I do not like is when terms are made to smoke candles.
No, I will not speak of "tolerance" of "Europe", of "freedom of speech" and the like today.
With the so-called "spirituality" I'm through.
Suppose we now look at "Divine Source" before.
As it bubbles always out, quite pure, divine even.
The thing therefore is self-explanatory. Who then around it referred to as just the ramblings ramblings, thus demonstrating one hundred percent that he is either a stubborn, unholy goal, or just a bad guy.
First time but I do not know where the "The" is.
Why there should be only one divine source? Must it be so? Why?
And why "source"? Could it not be a divine volcano, which donates water not all the time (which is the obvious association with "source"), but from time to time spewing fiery primal energy?
Or a divine air pump? The will be drawn?
Or a divine Erdschleuder? She wants to be stretched?
A divine Ätherodrom?
And why "divine"? Why not Urquelle? Why not the original source? - Sounds to me at least grippy, less verschwurbelt.
Yes, less verschwurbelt so less spiri, less eso, less effective in soul fish.
The Ur would still prefer it. You could explain that this is not the Rindviech is meant more educated yes.
And again would rather have the "Ha!". For that is undoubtedly the human Urlaut, Erstlaut.
Okay. Just not the divine. Which is apparently a gurgling, splashing, hissing. A Fontainieren.
Of course I know that people who like to wallow in lofty terms, have no time for it to reside with logical or even runic trifles. The swollen breasts is important, who wants to be cared for.
Names are Quall and upsetting jaja. That the word "salvation" an emanation of the H (a) is rune that stands for the whole cosmic order, who must know, who cares something.
You have to be yes, yes he should only equal to not deal with the various spheres and their associated terms: one has "Divine Source".
In addition, one has quantum several decades. These then came the computer. And because this is a not understandable, the other can expect fabulously fast, it now has the "quantum computer", the so about the whole thing should be constantly fed by the divine source, that is not quite the whole: But who keeps already at this kind of bumps on?
I.
Oh yes, there it is again, the evil ego. Like as if runes and logic and semantics were not already reprehensible enough. Deibel well.
It is about time that I take off the kid gloves three times again.
Not that I'm still confused with the divine source.
- Ads -
Tags: Divine Erdschleuder , Divine air pump , volcano Divine , Divine Ätherodrom
One could also say first cause, but actually that's timeless space beyond the matter beyond all concepts.
Urquell & mind (united in apolarity) meets mE's best.
https://dudeweblog.wordpress.com/urquell-sinn-allen-seins-und-lebens/
And further: Lies finally Risi. ;-P
In this context, would recommend to his trilogy on the multidimensional cosmos II Part I &.
Of course you do not need (Risi describes the free will of the individual way too;-)), but I assume you do not do it, will you you still endlessly on such (from my point out meaningless) Hang questions.
Maybe I'll write NEN detailed articles about the topic, but I have no time for it until further notice.
. Listed above Part I & II Ps A very rough (and hence also very defective) Summary of the 1200 pages you can find in the following half-hour interview:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jk5N1kYliW0
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yf5dcikWNrQ
Oh, and at the beginning of Part I of the interview, you can skip a lot.
@ Magnus
"First time but i do not know where the" The "coming."
What do you mean, if the first man must have rather been a man or a woman?
As in the movie "Life of Brian" by Monty Python (bed. Increased snake) is said when this one guy wants to be called immediately to Loretta and want to have children and then where the leader says, he would have no Mummu and whether it will then pick up his child in the cigar box.
If you consider it so so right, but, yes, it must have THE original source (which may indeed be meant figuratively) loud. There must have been a Mother Goddess, a human woman of course. And this is the spirit that is in all human heads and you've got the female God of course is fully there mentally. And what the rest of creation concerns, which can explain also, if you look a bit different logic. As logic namely, which is based on the spirit in which everything ultimately arises (Note: present tense). And I'll say it again, the solution to bring the space-time continuum. Unfortunately, the scientists think only in one direction only, namely to draw from the start nis end of a straight line, perhaps it is because they are very male oriented. From patriarchy they have some leave to take freedom of movement. So they say the sun THE sun and moon they say THE - everything they say the wrong way round! They also say the Big Bang - Big Bang OF. And there is already THE first mistake, because how can a big bang with a fountainhead be comparable? And for "God particle they say THAT. But WHAT is it the God particle? They just come on the way through matter, they want to concede to the initial force, not more. Over and over it goes even deeper, into the very smallest matter present. See the experiments in CERN. Even Stephen Hawking has given up yet to find THE Urquelle in even the smallest THE mass of matter.
LG Anders Share
"The solution to bring the space-time continuum."
Opposition: Just not! The eternal and intangible, divine consciousness ...
Of these, apart that there are energy sources, and Mr. Anders Tell zuwenigst already using observable laws of nature, earthly reality, as a parable or logical synchronicity has adequately explained that Akasha, Ether, as [indeed präsexuelle] mother, or source should be understood it is also a fact. When you died circa, your emanation, which (1) universe developed to a "strange one" - which is probably the "male" characteristics, the quasi (for a "you" pronounced) "Divine Animus" means. At the end of the (re) evolution but is a female, not a hybrid, and if the seat / throne of Nature / the Divine (spoken: nature) is female ...
That this "miracle babies" - a miracle perhaps for Es / yourself - is divine, holy, teaches philology. Well, "the Queen", as you call has me often forced almost to his knees in front of ehr "-fearing" amazement whether what / ubiquity is explicable only by omnipotence, and because of the genuinely divine humor. The source throne has done it all - and for good reason.
@ Jochen & Lis Minou
It is fabulous what you done there. Can you give you a hand on it.
@ Jochen & Lis Minou
I do not want you yes hang. The piece of Lis is simply more elegant than that of Jochen, and I do not judge so because I am more than on presumed on presumed women men.
Just look at the ductus as such here and there, so can beat in a final award, the bar to one side only.
That may you, dear Joe, but not grieve, for I saw your poetry already different and wunderete me more still, insofar as I saw more of those in future not yet, because the fact that they themselves out further erwüchse like.
Magnus
I recommend a guest contribution;-)
@ Dude & Jochen & Lis Minou
You could even write the same three parallel guest posts.
I would certainly enjoy it, then the only comment.
@ Jochen
"Unfortunately, the scientists think only in one direction only, namely to draw a straight line from beginning to end, perhaps it is because they are very male oriented. From patriarchy they can take a lot of freedom of movement. "
Yes, there is more than just something to it. As for your subsequent interpretation of the grammatical gender of the sun and moon in German, but I am very skeptical. A very difficult area. I urge as strongly caution to the effect not to draw hasty conclusions.
@ Lis Minou
I really like how you "schwurbelst". Stimulating.
@ Dude
'' The solution bring the space-time continuum. "
Opposition: Just not! The eternal and intangible, divine consciousness ... '
Well, if it deromaßen is at stake, you ought to not splash out. Armin Risi has, as you think, but everything exactly understood and explained: Because it would be easy, along some quotes clear who really has the plan.
@ All
If you feel like to set something as the main contribution, so I will not edit the Respective this time. (Reject most, when it comes to gross negligence to me.) So write error, etc. can be merciless. Your Dreie can do it yourself.
Magnus
You can use my comments of what you want in lektorierter version or so as it stands here. I do not care - just as if you do not want.
I now do for a while did nothing more, except whilst watching the world go bachab goes, while I laugh lautschallend about the idiocy.
Ps. I do not by the way if my comments are censored gradually care. Does not matter anyway ...