That the so-called MSM media, the classic sheep media reader comments censor what it's worth, is also known as little surprise.
Less well known but somewhat surprising, at least at first glance, how many massively censor "alternative" portals, nachlöschen, lock.
I myself have had similar experience, but heard again and again very credible the fact that I'm not the only colorful dog whose objections are apparently not so rare perceives alswie the horse apple on the white tablecloth.
We are talking here of course only of contributions, the extent of free speech in Germany legally, the operator has thus not protecting himself as the commentators, and of those that do not contain exaggerated insults or vulgarities or so off-topic, perhaps only to advertising purposes, just purely arbitrary, simply because the operator does not fit the content, the Light of the world can not see network.
Witziger- or sadly, as one might see it often seem just so not squeamish deal operators, especially the rant loudly about media manipulation with their own clientele.
What of the ox shall not (to denounce in the media sheep), this is probably the Jupiter bargain.
Jupiter texts can in fact have no gross inconsistencies, the reader notices a Jupiter, sure.
It seems actually to go to a kind of nimbus of Gurutums: you have to can be easily criticized by every running up Schlunz.
Often it may be shrewd calculation: this commentators I shoo rather equal, or teach him Mores.
On the whole, it is but one way or another, to a modulation of the herd to followers.
One has, as measured by the real or supposed benefits, usually little harm in it. Because few dare to know to effectively defend themselves, to spread the myth, whosoever where what. Many are too cowardly, others want to be a traitor to possibly put himself in an oblique light by the reflection of the Guru trailer almost certainly in the direction goes, the Censored had just misbehaved accordingly.
And also: "The man does make good, important work, we must not tear myself!"
So stigmatized is fast that which points to censorship, and not the censor.
But too many fig. Again and again I read the whining, one was there and there was already censored sound whenever. Why then is he always go back and try their luck each time to the smaller, again?
Can he not rightly zuwenigst suspect that happens to others as well? That if probably the most comment anyway anonymously, then censored nor will, alsomit published opinion deliberately interfered with, you (almost?) Must already speak of a kind of black Bude, on whose prosperity he was as Unterstmöchtegernadept, he nevertheless at the end conducive involved?
It is often enough apparently, also just another guru who is close to the operator guru, or the guru is to be doubted that the lever is folded.
People who act in a way which I definitely do not want to be governed instead of those who currently see them at the helm, I will in no weighty responsibility. Because they are responsible not. And best of cowardice or blind allegiance. Otherwise, from the "real" base motives.
The user must judge it.
You can in fact choose to not only comment, but on other sites and from their experiences censorship, quite specifically, to report.
This seems already increasingly occur.
More of it.
- Advertisement -
Tags: Sheep Media