Instead of pausing to take back something that the U.S. network giant is behaving even more brazen.
Google harassed his YouTube video adjuster, ie precisely those of which the daughter lives, such as whether they would have there to Bittgang.
The young German activist network "Jasinna" has now described very nicely.
One should deliver still further, Clear Name ago, phone number, Google + account, otherwise it no longer properly funzt, and videos with over 15 minutes in length no longer run.
Well fine.
This excellent service of the NSA, which also makes good private business, the NSA but also saves a lot of money by getting what they want, without having to even hold the capacity for it, so keeps us all for Depp Staner, for remote Borgs.
That CONTENT not by programmers, computers, generated by algorithms, but only processed and made available, so you should be glad to be able to be an avid service provider, if you already own creates nothing interesting that you have probably forgotten, or you it displaces, where "Do not be evil!" the motto.
"Suck them all out and enslave them thorougly!": That would be recognized honest.
Yes, to the search, I use the services of this company yet. They should still see what interests me. Since they already see that even one so much interested in what should not interest him. In addition, a good customer, also in the sense of the incoming traffic.
I'm a journalist but also in a different position because an innocent owner.
However, it may very well be that I Google will eventually no longer use (which does not mean that the company does not yet figure out how I will look for information), me it a shite still interested in how, where do I stand there in the Range .
And even even if I get downgraded everywhere, on page 37, or 115 order get less traffic. This may eventually be even completely no matter to me.
In addition to the monitoring (the case of other user behavior, if it is not quite set, about every other service probably will remain similarly effective.): This is about harassment
How much of that can you offer?
If no other service (providing, of course, the NSA, or she taps him from) friendly offer his services?
When I see that I somewhere to some "account", so open an account, to even just to leave comments, I usually have the channel fully. Here with me no one needs an account in order to say something may.
Am I a banker? Can I not be happy if someone spontaneously interested, want to say something without register, first of all have Epost, password, all the shite must reinziehen?
Pages, where I first "log in" I must, after just such filing, I boycott a long time. Why do they do that?
To gauge their censorship needs better?
So they can lock me trouble, if they want to?
As yet make a lot of private, smaller media and operators ultimately similar than what Google now attaches to YouTube.
Anything else would be a real name Forum, where you can specify only occurs, as before in the classic letter if the name specified and the editorial also known address. Then open sight for all who have the ass to in the pants. (And maybe the head on the neck.)
So people report below deck name that many in any case, try to hide their IP, which is also not funzt so pretty, thereby making even more suspicious, in short, a single stupid Gepfitze.
Google is just the tip of the iceberg.
We generally need to rethink.
- Advertisement -
Tags: Accounts , Depp Stan , real name Forum , NSA , YouTube videos , censorship
"" Suck them all out and enslave them thorougly! ": That would be recognized honest".
Definitely!
I use the search engine of the octopus by the way also, but without that this can create a profile of me. :-D
-> https://startpage.com/deu/protect-privacy.html
Maybe that's the reason why they so some of my publications rauszensieren constantly, and I rather it go out that it's the content, not see certain circles so much ... It does not matter - shit on the octopus.
"When I see that I somewhere some" to account ", so open an account, even just to be able to comment on, I usually have the channel fully. Here with me no one needs an account in order to say something may. "
Ditto! I boycott Comment strands logins want for a long time generally. Providers see Yes IP & Epost address what they want? In addition, many places censored anyway, that trooper. I could now call in some alternative circles very popular portals as examples, but for now let the time still remain.
"Anything else would be a real name Forum"
The played the surveillance Psychos still in the hands! In addition, you have also since there is no guarantee that one will not occur under a pseudonym. So you should in this respect would continue to have at least the freedom to choose!
Kind regards from Georg Horweil:-D
Ps. https://dudeweblog.wordpress.com/2013/12/05/jasinna-kart-uber-den-terror-des-google-konzerns-gegenuber-youtube-nutzern-auf/
"Anything else would be a real name Forum"
This happened once before and it was called "Nensch". Apparently all enrolled under real names (copy of ID to the Admin). The forum was totally at odds after a few years and was dissolved. The trolls have toddled off under real names, and how ...
@ Bl
Interesting. What once but failed, must not fail again. Certainly a matter of administration.
https://dudeweblog.wordpress.com/2014/08/14/beep-beep-boop-update-verunstaltet-wordpress-zum-kindergarten/
@ Dude
First, thanks for the link. Amazing I find there. I still do not really know what WordPress because neuderdings havoc and intends wonder about the message of the platform, with which I have worked for years quite easily.
The outrage seems great, and it seems justified; I ask myself, the program wofern deliberately complicated so and lowered, why someone should do that. The trouble with the primary users is so programmed.
More monitoring? - Monitors is but anyway everything.
Plug not only stupidity and hubris and hipsterdom behind it, so wish - what? - Other motives come into consideration?