There are no real monotheism. At least among the Christians. But the Jews and the Muslims have also never materialized. It always needs capped auxiliary gods. Time angels, holy times, times the Mother of God, jinn, whatever.
All mendacious substitute for a polytheism or animism.
It may be that here and there one out there who can handle his homemade monotheism.
The postulated universal spirit. Ultimately, a diffuse pantheism. Everything is God. Durchströmeter divine spirit.
But that everything is somehow no matter just a game. But then again not.
Because there are those who do not want to follow, the apostates, the evil. They do not want to admit that they are part of that universal spirit.
The most they themselves created. Who else?
No one knows something basic, but everyone claims times just going to come hell.
The best thing I find it when I is held that with me so it will not go always as straight because I did not believe in this and that.
Since it is nothing that I learn and be creative enough. The fact that I even own daily new worlds erschüfe. The least interested me.
Together, the three "great" monotheistic religions are so crudely, and laughable at the base, illogical and inconsistent that it terrified the sow, she knew to deal with it or interested in it something like that.
All orders, commands, curses.
What a conceptual poverty.
The only people that monotheism has really brought something, are the respective priests. The still live well of him.
He must indeed, since on the one hand, such a fascination, on the other hand not quite understand, are constantly mediated. On that entering the desired comfort.
True monotheism ends up back in animism. Everything is God, divinely inspired, the universal spirit.
This would be sufficient, you could throw away all the unholy books.
From there you would be, at best, back when shamans.
But that's not enough money and power, which is why the whole seizure continues.
What all talk so much?
If there is only one Allgott what is there to talk about it then?
Then the thing would be obvious, right?
But no, but no. So simply we want it but we do not.
God's will will indeed daily, achwas be reinterpreted as ever at any moment.
What a bad literature!
What a pathetic logic!
How is because the cat chasing its tail!
Oh dear.
I end now.
- Ads -
Tags: monotheism
http://armin-risi.ch/Artikel/Philosophie/Jenseits_von_Gut_und_Boese.html#Titel02
And if you ever finally "throws light no shadow" Risis masterpiece'd read, all your questions have been answered questions here ...
@ Magnus
Is it you noticed?
"Everything mendacious replacement ....
Oh dear. "
You schriebest from A to O and then came with you to the end of the world:
"I end now."
Really, very nice on the nature of the Bible, this construction. The initial rest at the top of your text, I see as a prelude to where God says: "I leave it to be".
To each their own creation!
And then came dude and he made light due Risis masterpiece. With the sun in the sky that casts no shadow.
"One ring to rule them all,
One Ring to find them,
A ring to drive them into darkness
bind them. "
(From Tolkien's Lord of the Rings)
The Fisherman's Ring, to see in the sky during a total solar eclipse.
Vergelds God.
"Just the three" great "monotheistic religions are so crudely, and laughable at the base, illogical and inconsistent that it terrified the sow, she knew to deal with it or interested in it something like that."
But billions of people are willing to follow them - WHY?
What drives so many people into the clutches of sects?
Million people are willing to follow our crude system in Germany - WHY?
First comes the brainwashing, then carried from the indifference. Questioning stops - it is all so accepted as it is.
One might almost think that people would be happy slaves.
Of every tree of the garden you shall not eat, only the tree of knowledge!
4.Mose 11: 4 And the upstart rabble in their midst had become very lusting: and the children of Israel began to cry again, saying, Who shall give us flesh to eat? 5We remember the fish we ate in Egypt for nothing, and the cucumbers and melons, the leeks, the onions, and the garlic; 6nun but our soul is dull, our eyes see nothing but manna!
... And sand. For their Liberator they had straight out into the desert.
Bread and game - Panem et cercenses, that's what the people desire. But they then also like to go voluntarily to toil for others, can be disenfranchising etc.
The attempt to take away the them, which must have been straight seduced by Satan - The old story just, from Adam and Eve and the serpent.
And who wants to be in a pot already with Satan? For he is so angry, because he brought the people the knowledge that they live in dependence.
If people would but finally noticed who the real evil ...
But no, they have indeed fear that they would die. Here, but just no way around it. Rather, this is the way. And because people just do not get along so that her whole life from today to tomorrow has zero value, since they came up with the idea of the afterlife; and whosoever brings them positive encouragement, which is great among the people and it will not even shied not to elect him to the Lord and God. And the people of their imagination take over most of a life after death, which they follow very willingly, and then questions will also no longer even asked. And even if the master has already all the answers to all questions ready, and then called The Holy Bible. That is their God! The word you wrote down the bliss. And no matter whether in mono (Allah) or stereo (father and son) or in 5.1 surround sound (Buddhism, Confucius, Hinduism), the main thing you have your Theos-I-must follow you.
@ Dude
You tell me over and over again, that Armin Risi had the full view, I should just read that book and understand, because I could learn anything.
I'll probably read times. If I ever feel like it and have the leisure to do so.
However, I have good reason to believe that my reception of the work will not turn out to your liking.
And I, as long bedrängelt (Jochen names above the Lord of the Rings, I should always read, even as a teenager, but turned myself by finally 30 years later, tried it, but then, despite the wonderful language of Mr. Tolkien , going somewhere bored from), then probably not get around to a review (I know myself), so I'll probably wait.
That would certainly quarrel with you, and after that I'm just no value.
@ Jochen
You got it covered. Sauber. Thank you.
@ Jochen
Addendum
Confucius, with which I have yet concerned me quite thoroughly, in my opinion, does not fall under the category designated by you.
Jochen
"With the sun in the sky that casts no shadow."
Nönö, You may consider the not materialistic, but symbolically! The light-intentioned does not apply to photons ...
And speaking of Tolkien's beautiful and matching Gedichtlein: https://dudeweblog.wordpress.com/2013/11/10/die-satanische-marketing-strategie/ ;-)
And what Panem et Circenses concerns, read the following recommendation for Dich: https://dudeweblog.wordpress.com/2013/11/24/uber-das-konsumgebaren-das-unterhaltungstreiben-und-die-plappermentalitat-der-schuldgeldknechtschaftssklaven-dreckskapitalismus-teil-ii/
Magnus
"You tell me over and over again, that Armin Risi had the full view, I should just read that book and understand, because I could learn anything."
Sure, and as I shall not weary, because it is the the various ideologies revealing standard work par excellence. As for nonfiction, is just one of the quality in about her on the same stage. Zarathustra!
Can I still did not decide which of the two I präferiere - they are about the same, well ahead of all other ...
"However, I have good reason to believe that my reception of the work will not turn out to your liking."
The view we then. ;-)
Lord of the Rings is certainly also recommended, but as far as Phantasy-Sci-Fi, is the masterpiece nachwievor King's Dark Tower epic, with Tad Williams Otherland is better than LotR also lengths.
@ Dude
I did not know that risk a great poet.
Nor that of Zarathustra is a nonfiction book.
Completely new knowledge.
Either you want to make fun of me, or you increase you in there in what.
I guess in any case sometimes quite strong.
But yes you can, so to speak, as bait, sometimes in quote a particularly poetic passage of risk here.
Because I'm curious.
As far as I know, has never risk his own poetry published. However, he has very deeply studied and Hölderlin - think - sometimes published what it.
But yes, the non-fiction book was the wrong term. However, LwkS is not (only) a nonfiction book.
"Either you want to make fun of me, or you increase you in there in what."
Neither. I just typed something quickly, because currently some degree - as always at the same time - running. As happens Schusselei ...
@ Dude
Such Schusselei does no good.
No matter how late it is and what else to do.
In the worst case it is where it gets serious, fatal.
No problem with me. We know each other long enough.
@ Dude
"The light-intentioned does not apply to photons ..."
You mean the light of the Spirit, I know. Well, either you have this light or you do not. But what means you already have one in this world here and must not only wait to get it in the afterlife or after death; and I ask myself just one dead before that strives for as a seedling up to the light, he would have long understood during his life, but that the inner desire, what he feels in himself, only to have a cause, namely when the mind would not let him strive, then he would have no desire for Something. And since the death also stops the craving, the light remains in the light, which means the spirit in the spirit and what is dead, needs no more spirit from the outside, because he is himself only the ephemeral spirit and no longer sought. Or, as someone has said: He has experienced something that only he has seen on its own, can only talk about it with someone who has also experienced. But just closes then yes mutually exclusive.
Jochen
No, I do not mean the light of the Spirit, but symbolizes the light, as noted by me, just the awareness of the divine individual.
The mind is - albeit at high frequency-subtle - nachwievor part of the multidimensional quantum computer, while the consciousness of the divine individual is just beyond the space-time continuum in eternity.
Thus, one can not have this light, especially since it is so intangible. It IS there! The only question is whether one of which is also aware! Or what do you think, then, why it is called consciousness and awareness have not? ;-)
However, the existence within the quantum computer must unfortunately obscured this light, which is why the final goal clearly is the space timeless state of consciousness beyond matter for me.
See also here: https://dudeweblog.wordpress.com/urquell-sinn-allen-seins-und-lebens/
And here: https://dudeweblog.wordpress.com/2013/04/07/bewusstsein-und-existenz/
And hier: https://dudeweblog.wordpress.com/2013/03/29/sein-nichtsein-unendliche-verganglichkeit-in-unwandelbarer-ewigkeit/
Ps. More I say this - at least here - not more.
Magnus
Still to Hölderlin. See link at the bottom here: https://dudeweblog.wordpress.com/2013/06/15/zitatsammlung-holderlin/
@ Magnus
"Monotheism is a chimera"
Since yesterday, I know that this is not quite true. It should really read: Monotheism is a chimera, with a at the end.
Who this monster is able to defeat that has the initial spark for this place, so that everything can change dramatically. Because then people will wake up. I say this just so completely natural and free. Everything else will never get us, because we can still write our hands so very sore or talk blue in the face.
People cling to the given things because they know no better. Either you give them something better, which is hardly possible, because it all has totally solidified, or run them in mind, that what they believe so firmly and what they hold on to, not the one by which they mean that it the last and highest authority. But why should I do it all alone, thinking even once about it. But what it needs, which are evidence. Without evidence will never do anything. Since you can still talk so long by a light, a primal source of being, or that poetry and thought the A and O is until it is so that one day out. As long as people Jehoshua, Allah or Yahweh have and the government gives them for their forced labor, bread and circuses, as long as the monster is reflected in their own light and says: Mirror, mirror on the wall, tell me who is the most beautiful chimera throughout the country, er in the world? And as long as the waking fails, as long as the world has its king, although in truth a great scoundrel (impostor) is. As says the Englishman? Take the dog off his bones and he is evil. And dogs can guide you on who to be angry.
@ Jochen
You captured things getting better.
I am pleased.
This is encouraging.