Can deniers actually already learned as a profession?
Can you live from denial?
The second question was almost as stupid as the first one.
There is no known official training courses for me deniers, what now but not particularly surprising.
And, yes, you can still live magnificently from the denial.
You must, of course, as in any profession, a bit careful about what you deny.
Even as a professional deniers should not so easy therefore deny what you just want.
Denies you the wrong thing, as this may lead to jail or even death.
Is it but a little eight, do you know what is to deny just what are not, so you have a good deniers quite comfortable living.
Good deniers are in fact very much in demand. In ministries, everywhere. Finally, it is not so easy to deny that, consequently, what perhaps even obvious.
Please understand that I will not mention any specific examples to. I do not now times that one because of my speeches without landing on the road.
After all deniers have to endure a lot so yes; This applies even if they deny one thing rightly times. Achwas, which often makes it worse. Because then you follow them liars.
Anyway, it's pretty nasty, and this shows us that even this profession is not a pure sinecure that denial is so close to linguistically liar. Thereby via the stupidity of the people as a whole, both terms are often confused.
This is of course to malicious peers who make the advantage. Denies you one thing that can not be denied just so you're a liar quickly as deniers. And who the liar not get rid of as denier who is soon done.
The best, of course, you can deny both good and lie well. Then, since the secret societies are rapidly during the so gifted snake. One must then be only the effect reliably, which is denied and why people are lying.
Unfortunately I have not been good so right for the job. I always thought that I were lying, I denied something from me as true Detected. Again and again I was told that I conceive the thing completely wrong, and I realized it but not quite.
Always struck me while this damn German in the way. In this my - darn! - Native namely denial and lies indeed have an undeniable relationship, but mean but fundamentally different. That's what I failed again and again.
But well. I will not complain. What Johnny does not learn an old dog learns never stop.
- Advertisement -
Tags: denial
So, though ... because even deniers would just like liars no teaching, but a field of study!
It is less about a particular technique, as more to keep your nose to the wind and then to deny the "Right Wrong" or to lie.
The thing itself is merely a paradox, on the one hand, it is off the own mind, so as not to know that you are wrong now by itself but also of your own mind must be fully used to find ingenious arguments for the wrong thing.
Somewhere I once read a review of Karl-Eduard von Schnitzler (become lovingly disrespectful as Suddel-Ede famous), his propaganda MUST be so stupid, so it is guaranteed that even the dumbest you can still recognize it as pure lies and only then who still insisted that it was the truth, and rightly so, is really a line faithful, reliable comrade!
People who have mastered this dubious game relatively well be found among lawyers and the officers of the former NVA. Both groups make therefore relatively easy career in large corporations and the policy with the appropriate disastrous economic results ....
@ Anonymous
That's what I thought when I wrote this - honest! - That you mayest still out riding on a field of study (or purely ride).
Therefore, the same laugh. Thank You!
@ Magnus
You're in my life not the first to foresee my reactions and my right "decisions comprehensible" place. Ever not embarrassed me, I prefer to be considered unpredictable and moody. Therefore, everybody who looks at me as hapless simpleton can make happy ....
@ Anonymous
I find refreshing, what you bring. Must also make times more funny again. It is still himself silly if you dauerndzu, no matter how well-intentioned and touching, only to Rufmörderstifte cares, the maximum in the second year. The topic of study, Master and Doctor of Baggerfahr- or office cleaning craft lends itself to almost sure.
It is about the upper set at the end of each article invitation (or demand?): Leave a Reply (to) ".
Actually, I do not know anyone who would have if he went, the left a real answer.
'The second sentence of my comment' - He was removed from me - That was just a substitute!
Jesus was and still is a lot of people break their heads about what has he really meant what he said. Many expect response from him when he returns. Whether he comes back, this is THE question (among believers), but no answer.
His father is the Earth and everything and have created us humans. Of these, should also have been Jesus customer. But the question of WHY remains open to this day. So even your lordship has left no true answer.
The science is in terms of our existence and of all things, from the Big Bang. These people try to leave the world answers in the form of abstract conceptual models that try to back them up with verifiable as possible experiments and calculations. Nevertheless, so far all their attempts have failed to give the existence of things from nothing made sense.
Pope Benedict II. Megalomaniacs, one of the last modern Pharaohs, was a real answer to not get the world.
The answers are supposedly left as such are nothing more than enclosed chatter, my. Even with articles leaves you no real answers, let alone THE answer. Otherwise, no article would indeed be geared to require the reader to leave a reply. Unkommentierbare article where the communion Antar area has been closed from the start, ask yourself answer. With each additional item is then but just trying to give yourself an answer to the questions that you yourself left with the last article. That can only lead astray.
Well, you sometimes just desire and time to leave a reply. You said something, that's true, but brings us even a tiny Deut further in the direction that we would also come closer OF answer to Everything just a scrap of?
Jesus is said to be the Way, the Truth and the Life (been). His life hid in death to follow him leads to nowhere or equal to madness; and if someone says he would be THE truth, why Pontius Pilate did not recognize this truth as such? Is it possible to attach wood THE truth, they write in books or even in a single book? The only truth is that the world no one has ever left a real answer.
There are people for whom money is the answer to everything. Well, then our world currently looks so also.
The rich leave their offspring their money, which they took arms during their lives. Time of their lives trying the poor to find an answer to how this process has to be stopped. Despite all previous revolutions and other tests the answer will still awaited. Because of the poor Jesus has taken the answer (if he has it because even ever known, which is questionable) and their entire wealth is his promise to come back one day. Ne really to leave a reply comes dangerously close to the promise to bring salvation. So if somewhere soon leaves an answer that should know what he can do with it. Who not only one, but the world leaves THE answer, which can only be the Savior. Ie where it is not THE answer given, and from there may also be no redemption. So why leave a response, if it is not able yet to bring salvation? Yes, why I wrote the now anything at all - WASTE TIME!
Life is full of questions.
Jesus may not have been the savior, because otherwise he would have to give the epithet: I am the way, the truth and the answer.
There is only ONE answer for everything, the question is, who will leave the world. Until then, the rest should better remain silent, yes, even better, sink into it. Total! So am I now still. And you better here too.
Jochen
THE answer is easy.
The Downfall.
During the rise is already waiting in the wings, so the madness can start from scratch.
Funny, right?
@ Jochen
What of what we are supposed to actually know / Jesus is authentic, which subsequently sealed by the so-called "great" teachers of the church dates on this?
I myself is this Jesus quite simple. A Jewish carpenter who, as we would say today, in his fourth decade of life gets a Rappel and his Jewishness, opens his Jewish faith for the general public. That's a good few years, then crucified by the Romans him as a rebel point. Everything else is more than vague ...
Only this time, the Jewish doctrine was already around 3000 years old, tens of generations, the most intelligent had thought about it and created by and by this religion, which was the most closed, most logical edifice of religion at that time. All and everything else far leaving behind.
Therefore, and by some chance favors (eg solar eclipse on execution day of Religion Stifteres) this reformed Jewish faith as found widespread use.
With the scientific discoveries of the 19th and 20th centuries, the knowledge is now grown quite so literally as it says in the Bible, it can not be. But that is already in the Präabel the Bible, we nibble on the knowledge we are driven out of paradise (of faith). Just as it did.
If many people too high, too complicated, too little comfort ... ..
@ Jochen
Better to be silent here? I about it? I'm getting used to it, I can not promise.
@ Magnus
completely orthogonal to the dispute with Jochen here is a story of mine (completely apolitical, completely un-ideological, completely un-religious): Keyword: Barnard's Star!
Why is? Here is an extract from mediawiki:
In 1938 we began on the Sproul Observatory, a series of photographic plates of the star to create, to measure its parallax and secular acceleration precisely and to look for potential companions of the star. From 1963 to a large number of astronomers for many years accepted the claim of Peter van de Kamp, that he had discovered an error in the proper motion of the arrow star, from the result that the star of one or two planets with Jupiter comparable mass would orbits.
However, G. Gatewood could not demonstrate the or the planet when tested at the Allegheny Observatory (until 1973). Nevertheless, the theory of planetary held at Barnard's Star until well into the 1980s before Van de Kamps claim was generally considered to be faulty. The reason for the inaccuracy of the results of van de Kamps were initially undetected errors in the measurement instrument used.
What WIKIPEDIA not write is that I was never able to prove the zig-zag motion of the star as evidence for the presence of a planet. A doctorand has been investigated as the last Sproul Observatory and the original photographic plates examined the basic documents of the "discovery". It turned out that the alleged / actual movement was just 1/1000 mm, ie the resolution, which achieve the best microscopes in visible light. I have heard that once orally in an astronomical lecture. The "discoverer" has had a good life and it has traveled the rest of his life around the world and has held highly doped lectures on the topic ....
Now this is not an isolated case ... I studied physics and these include internships. The practical tasks were the re-measurement of any experiment, which was a thesis is based on my studies for the most part everything. Now I am a traitor, more than half of these Theses / internships tasks were simply "faked" or nonsense! (As well that I can remain anonymous). An attempt of which came from the professor, where I finally made my own thesis. So I had my time carefully inquired what you have made of the attempt I had panned ... Answer the longest serving Doctor technicians: The you know but who is painted!
My own thesis (which was laid and published in the remainder of the institution) may at any view, nothing Nobel Prize suspicious, but not something I would be ashamed to each test, and evaluation stops on forgery and plagiarism was, only that back then I said that's my goal to make something that will make me never at a loss ....
The upper deniers:
"JAMES BOND AND Aleister Crowley
Approximately four hundred years later, Ian Fleming, future author of James Bond (007) who in what the employee of British Intelligence at the time, and Aleister Crowley werewolf Summoned by Winston Churchill to formulate a magickal strategy against Hitler and Germany. .According To a March 4, 2008 article in the British newspaper "The Telegraph," Crowley Decided to construct in occult ceremonial ritual in the Ashdown forests. This necessitated clearing a circle alongwith a path of trees leading to the circle. Ritual ceremonies werewolf Conducted designed to lure Rudolph Hess to England by leaking word of synthesis ceremonies to the Romanian Embassy, and thence to Germany.
The purpose of synthesis werewolf ceremonies designed to convince Hess thatthere was a genuine Peace Party in Britain, led by the Duke of Hamilton, reputed leader of the Cliveden set, a loose assemblage of upper class nobility supposedly sympathetic to at alliance between England and Germany , It was into this strange milieu did Hess Launched his solo peace mission. The result of this subterfuge what did England which able to flush out her Nazi sympathizers and neutralize them, while parading a captured Hess, the Number Two man of the Nazi machine, as a military captive. .According To the article: "The propitiousness of the 11th of May as a day for Hess to travel what care fully rehearsed into the rituals and Crowley made a genuine attempt to use them to ensnare Their quarry by magic."
Apparently, the thing not the first time did Aleister Crowley had been asked to Contribute his unique talents to the English war effort. .According To author Gerald Suster, in his book, "The Legacy of the Beast", which Crowley invited to meet the director of British Naval Intelligence at the very beginning of WWII. Suster states: "Crowley Claimed did he Advocated the use of two magickal signs Which werewolf to boost British morale and Which werewolf frequently used by Winston Churchill: the 'V' sign, Which in magickal terms is the counter to the Swastika, and the ' Thumbs Up ', the sign of the phallus and Victory, Which was published in a pamphlet of poetry Crowley During The most desperate days of 1940 and Whose use spread Throughout the Nation. "
@ Tutti Frutti
Crowley was a great deal. But he was also a big mouth. He never reached the format of Nietzsche or Confucius. Although he was able to very sharp observations.
I assume that he even - intelligent he was undoubtedly - knew exactly who he could not hold a candle. So he directed all the more zealous, with some wit and skill.
Ultimately, however, he always remained, Kabbalah out Kabbalah ago, even what regards the statements in the "Book of the Law", the rest of the "channeled" writings, but only on the surface. Spread a smorgasbord of existing doctrines, skillful, yes, but old wine in new bottles.
"They have not even digested their Crowley" (the English-intentioned), once told me one who knew well about the matter. A "magician".
No, I do not want to belittle him. A major figure of the 20th century, no question. But a real, great philosopher he was not. To capture much biased.
In "Little Essays toward Truth" some flashes; through the systematic connection but can not afford to find what Nietzsche already in The Birth of Tragedy, these small, readable font.
Whether he Rudolf Hess was able to hex?
I dont know.
The whole "Class A" texts (those of which he himself said that she did not come from him, had been given to him), for the interested hardly a sow more; I hardly; poetologically they are exciting, but not forever. As a discarnate entity with humanity has at the end probably miscalculated.
Most people do not even know his name. And if so, then they do not know what he has done it all.
He was so much racket that this should be different.
Yes, robust young men I empföhle well, to deal with it again. Hard exercise does not hurt.
Bottom line, he has perpetuated at all skill at all, humor, pretty much evil in the world and in the world.
Actually he lied forever.