What drives this man?
Is this bad faith, or is possessed?
I'm talking about a prominent blogger who sometimes very perceptive, but partly also things under striking or recklessly omitting that belonged to the matter, in any case always very eloquent, ills of this world denounces it but apparently can not do without it, or can, with NS comparisons, attend.
To put it coarsens to say: Everyone who is now pushed by the rich in poverty, is like a Jew. Auschwitz lives. All over. All the time.
What is the purpose as a means of his approach?
He wants to shake up, shock, just attention?
He wants that whether the comparison no longer dares to contradict him?
He weighs his comparisons at all?
Does the one could against unscrupulous plutocrats only with the Nazi comparisons, no matter how obliquely sitting?
I am very suspicious in this case, because he this part completely warped mischief always very clever (for those needing it) in his otherwise long stretches well comprehensible incorporates considerations, the otherwise quite attest to some surveys.
I'm sorry: I'm suspicious when I see something.
If any tumber goal all the time and especially with Nazi shouting, therefore, so that's a long time nothing special anymore.
But someone builds virtually all text on this comparison and on him hinzielend on, after all, a prominent, very eloquent, but turned him well, so he loses to me in any case again and again credibility.
The man will be helped by me, at least not so quickly.
- Advertisement -
Tags: Nazi comparisons
@ Dude
Can the other so to ask if Pike and Coudenhove- Calergi were Nazis or probably rather benefactors of mankind ...
Just in case you want to find out what he you still unlock ...
"I'm curious as Jermain foutre le Camp will position itself. For now, most likely not. But, again: Behind the scenes, it is often quite different than on stage.
If he - that there are at very intelligent people quite often - just is not quite gaga what I now consider to be more probable than the other variant, ... "etc ...
- Well, in order to avoid misunderstandings, I here by replacing the word "he" with "Eifel philosopher" or other, as was first name spoken of me, but after that immediately, "he," what the unschlaue reader could then relate accidentally on me and my high prestige throughout the country could do great harm - which back to just light to me back at all my noble political educational work hardly the time to have, especially now hinzukömmt also the fact me "position" on a game board to have, has placed any meaning, simply because he has apparently nothing better to do.
@ Jermain foutre le Camp
Make easy no more about what I have to do better or worse thoughts. It may still be a lot.
I do not even know who you are.
My knowledge of human nature and my linguistics tell me simply that you're most likely grew up in German and almost as likely not a woman.
It's me but otherwise do not care who you are.
You are not only extremely talented, but also exceptionally practiced not only in our language (some idiot yes disconnect the likes of the content from, the better, the more any), but this is not much you Productive occurred. Ultimately, nothing. "Good, that's cowardly," once said a man whose name I at least remember well.
Concretely content nothing.
I am you, you wofern do not mess it, just do not mention in this context, more precisely, I'm just one person left who does not show his face, which I know only a French deck name, not to mention more. Not only this. That your desire I hereby like to correspond.
Also, simply because you have shown above that you are not up to the confrontation. Were it otherwise, so you would have either kept silent or to cause said what.
Yes, Mr. Enver work stint chamberlain champion or something, you're just a coward when it gets serious.
First rule: Never show face.
Second rule: If it is critical, not even faceless concrete to say.
Third rule: Nevertheless compete with reductions.
Usually four and five behind the stove you can try auszusinnen you.
The season fits so slow to do so.
You know, with you I've got no doubt, but you have mastered the German too well what the others (do not get me with the cheap tricks, everyone knows that to divorce) has poured out on me.
Just go behind your stove. Since you are sitting well, can hinbruddeln before you.
Yes, Master, I'm going hard.
You are undoubtedly one of the best.
I can but always as good as you.
Carry yourself so better from the field, if you have no Traute.
(This is explicitly no threat of censorship. I will you continue to unlock everything in line with our laws. Matter what. Speech. Go ahead.)
Comprehensive and reliable unbeleckt, not even the Goeller will disturb you henceforth there.
Unless, of course, you bläkst it from there back to an angle of.
So much ink as you I have all.
It has just been shown splendidly that content probably interfere only.
They may be good for worst insinuations and slander, but are otherwise irrelevant.
It happens when people do not know anything more to say except something petty, irrelevant. Just so that a kind of counter-speech takes place.
So you can see where we stand.
To that extent this has the makings of one with star.
Jermain
"On a board" position "to have that forwarded any meaning, simply because he has apparently nothing better to do."
My speech.
Magnus
So you're not going to with Jermain!
Gradually should also take seriously You have eight. As I write anyway a very extensive work, it is also not big on it, if that is even more extensive, as I you still miteinzubeziehe, and believe me, you come because not much better off than Reiner.
Slowly, I'm sick of something completely deleted that enough snot exist, each Hetzer vollzukleistern resist honorable individuals that!
@ Dude
Aha. They declared me a genocide pioneer, and Jermain has me only to say that it is a formulation of me does not fit and I would have too much time.
Do I have the word "relation" spell yet?
I'm used to the last dregs of humanity, and then I will myself to purely pull such a meaningless Sülch still, without resistance?
Jermain it's either fuck what Eifel has since told about me, or he supports it, or he does not dare to contradict. Disturbing my only formulation. Since then he pulls himself. Really a class type. The Leonidas from the inkwell.
I will not take back a word.
Rather, I turn now to yet. I was probably too mild.
Can let me down, as much as you want.
Because multiple lese majeste, unnecessary distribution of letters, what you want.
Eventually it reached me.
@ Dude
I will respond to you tonight in more detail. Grade I have to work for bread.
@ Dude
Sun Jermain is certainly itself in a position to take a stand. If he can not be bothered because it, please.
You threaten me here now for the second time. Do you want to denigrate me as even worse than the Eifel did?
You were there by his own admission, who pointed him to my article, in which he is never mentioned. He is not the only one who constantly throws with Nazi comparisons around. It has not forced him to respond.
For certain people is simply everything Nazi, what does not suit them. Usually no one dares to say anything against it, simply out of fear, to get himself a corresponding stuck.
Jermain has now picked out a little something to still mitzugeben me. Otherwise, say nothing to the point. Since then it has after all not be surprised if I'm finally somewhat rough.
Who my texts I compose all the way, because I have nothing better to do (why? Else), are too boring, they just do not want to read. I hope this simple if-then logic is not too complicated.
I beg you, I no longer threatening. I will not threaten it. Should I about? I do not care. I will not do it. Me possibly defend themselves if they have to.
If you can see some of the treatment by Eifel and rainbow bender want (I warned you, before that you still end up with me soon in Nazi stews mayest, it did not take long), so that's your thing.
Now you've got me too - I had this afternoon, as I said, no time - more or less directly called a Hetzer. And: "So you're going with Jermain not!"
I have not even above, expressly stated for the first time, that I think he's one of the best. But why I still have not finished the pants fully before him. Regardless of what he may hold for a Schlunz me. If that is so, he can tell you. I have been far worse personal insults against me unlocked here.
Could be a nice little dispute, if he wants. Full year and thus give satisfaction it should be yes. Write it can certainly better than the vast majority. So: Have fun.
Magnus:
To your comment of 7:47 (the last from 20:23 below)
You wrote: "Do you simply no longer about what I have to do better or worse thoughts. It may still be a lot. "
Do you you just worry about how I'm going to position myself, then the problem is not there.
All the rest of this comment you wrote you only further itself, I think. If not, however, so I refer any of the words or statements to me, or they do not concern me, or not hit me.
Here you have gone targeted. In Eifel You've probably met.
"Jermain is either a shit what Eifel has since told about me, or he supports it, or he does not dare to contradict." In fact, the former is true because it is not my problem if you look at the event that a baseless letter gets written BACK, has specially summoned themselves, by having written such a FIRST in this direction.
Furthermore, I disagree with most, if the speech falls on me or what touched me, not when someone wants me to do or expect.
And the counter-response is so baseless, so you have this but even challenged and each of which you are asking, it is now to take a stand, you pull in with. If he does not, he is a coward or whatever. This reinforces my view that all of this you only have themselves written to you.
For just as you have written you the letter to Eifel only philosopher himself, he has just written his own to you himself.
For me it is of course just that I only write for myself. (That's why I write so little, I do not socialize much new about me out)
-
With a But you right, or take me in consideration. Wrongly declared to whatever you Eifel for one. If I already am involved in the discussion, I would morally for you too need the answer which, similar to Dude. But there are two differences. First, as you already said, we do not know, or I do not know you and you're not safe with me you anyway. Secondly, I think rightly Eifel philosopher on your assumptions you simply restore what. Smarter would have been true, it does not respond but whatever. Even if your suspicions are true; which was from the beginning your construct. The rest had to pay for Dude then, after removal of the construct through the Eifel philosophers.
Meanwhile, I've put myself in this construct, but does not work the way you wanted it and finally I think it was either a mistake on my part, to go into it myself or just irrelevant, as what happened in it.
Everything just ego. But I can kick myself that I participated again in it.
And I'm not going to 'let down' when you mean down do with it. My opinion as to the procedure with the said letter, I made it clear by my attitude. But that is no reason for me to represent you as anything else, in public and certainly not. That you this is so or so anyway, I suspect, and I knew even appreciate. To me it is ultimately not matter if you "take back a word." Your words to me (so this comments here within) the effect after anyway are not penetrated up to me; except that I actually once had a short smile.
-
Therefore, the request in between to Dude, not to have to defend because of the few words that are for reading only for the eyes here, believe me. There is no reason for this and is also silly.
-
Just two little things:
-The praise of my writing also does not matter, and I am just the same as criticism. This is for me both from the same pot.
-My desire to change your wording, so that no one believes you meant me was irony. And a good template to represent myself well. What should I do, I'm just a blogger.
To comment by 22:23
That the dispute is nothing.
An ongoing commentary banter will not take place by my side anyway.
For one .: About 'topics', I discuss practically nonexistent, I describe for me in my blog and do not care - or hardly to very rarely about whether, when, or how much it is read.
2: The Private Person Personal I also does not deal in comments.
What logically follows: That the dispute is nothing.
PS: What the fancy cute little dispute to which one has been pleased with majority do, she will not reveal to me. Maturity do not mean in any case well.
@ Jermain
You see things as you see them.
My speech may think, as your every own.