Circumcision: Intentional serious injury

I could not verify Linked here in detail because I do not associate myself on Facebook.

http://qpress.de/2013/10/05/facebook-zensur-kehle-durchschneiden-ist-ok-beschneidung-absolutes-tabu/

Check each self.

Circumcision remains, unless authorized by an adult as deliberate self-harm in itself, a serious crime.

It is an intentional serious bodily injury.

One should read the relevant text of the law to do so.

http://dejure.org/gesetze/StGB/226.html

- Ads -

Share this post with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages with others.
  • Facebook
  • Technorati
  • MySpace
  • LinkedIn
  • Webnews
  • Wikio DE

Tags:

2 Responses to "Circumcision: Intentional serious injury"

  1. Anonymous says:

    Hello Magnus,

    You know, I am a very strong opponent of this mutilation practice (I'm just so natural to do with you Duzis). Just beside / behind the legal aspect of the question I find interesting, what the women into to let your boys unanhängig mutilate of religion?

    On the contrary, the Catholic Church forbids the mutilation expressis verbis, but also the Catholic Americans does not prevent to be still mutilate your boys. What triggers this female mutilation mania without religious background? Why the same mother gets upset when a Catholic priest fondled her little son harmless to his gay sexual pleasure, if you can mutilate the same boys by a urologist to its financial gain? The first is a criminal offense, the second not.

    Why are gay pedophiles not simply urologist and then you can examine small boys not only to their hearts content on phimosis, but also maim yet?

    To understand the whole thing is not completely irrational and idiotic!

    Why mutilated Jews strike your mother not the incisors out if you have become marriageable after the religious principle: an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth and manifest as the mother finds mutilated boys nice he finds mothers beautiful with out beaten incisors, then true but everything in this world. As a criminal judge, I would refuse to adopt me in such a case, what else than an acquittal.

  2. Anonymous says:

    Once again, an item for Verstümmelungswut of doctors:

    http://www.spiegel.de/gesundheit/diagnose/aktivisten-fordern-operationsverbot-intersexueller-kinder-a-930978.html

    Snipped main thing and money to people who can fight back (yet).

Leave a Reply