In the heading "100 percent socially" I have no more desire to read the program of the left. It could be to find a point in it, which I agree.
What is a person who 100 percent socially?
Heard of 100% the other, or the others are 100% him, or is that the same thing?
A society which is made of 100% social Ichlosen, there is still someone who can think for themselves? Can? Also, only 10%?
It is the title of the whole program. So presumably, at least not intentional, at least not intentionally identifiable joke.
Do you want 100% socialism?
My dear Lord Choral Society. What can people put there, just because two or three reasonable demands may be found in a formation.
How to do that at all, its 100% socially?
How can I drive my golf, if the neighbor has only one wheel? Or only one from? Do I then abhaben one, or quickly hinbringen one and screw it as gently?
What a bad Bauernfängerei!
What a rip-off!
THE supposed to be the alternative to the plutocratic planetary fascism?
100% socialist planetary fascism?
Because who does not want to be 100% socially, which is the naturally instilled, and whether in one hundred percent socialization institutions. Right from the child. As long as it takes.
How else everyone and everything 100% should be social?
- Advertisement -
Think ?? Better not - could cause chronic discomfort ...;-)
"Because who does not want to be 100% socially, which is the naturally instilled, and whether in one hundred percent socialization institutions. Right from the child. As long as it takes. "
Thanks, just how I see it too!
And especially creepy this would be in a common cause with the SPD and the Greens or.
This article had me by the way also particularly liked the comment in Jesus since recent debate.
@ Jermain
I am very pleased that you goutierst this provocative piece.
The way I put Jesus in Riposte to our election or non-election, did not encounter everywhere on consent or even Delektiertheit cried out. As might be expected.
The Eifel philosopher has been cheering me on, in fact the Jesus thing, because although I was not even aware to me that the 100 percent was socially real from the left. So I was under informed. I thought it was from him. Funny.
LG
Magnus
I think this piece is not provocative, but logical.
;)
@ Jermain
Touché. It is not provocative, but logical. I should wean my shady Leisetreter land.
Well, if 100% is socially bad ... then what is the opposite of that? And the fact is it so? I mean yes.