Calling for a boycott of parliamentary elections (XII)

The Steinbrück against Merkel only the chance that the wegkracht the FDP and he must perform his job Bilderbergers B or C with the Left Party. An outside chance.

Not only that he is intellectually not up to her, her voice, for all phrases that they, too, threshing, the better.

Steinbrück has perhaps really set up only to lose, want him in the case of a grand coalition even as Vice-Chancellor under Merkel.

Diction default, it tries the large chainsaw, but it's just one, with which one can ablummeln 1500 Watt, Chinese lollipop at the discount, a few pine boughs.

As I said, I'm not for Merkel. Maybe better if this prevented Savings Bank Director drankommt, the truck shorter rather than longer painful moves to a necessary new ending. In it, he wants to be even superior to Merkel.

That's why I'm still not for Steinbrück. How should I also only have a better idea which US satrap will cause less damage to the bottom line?

The SPD is, like other parties also, now so nothing like moslem friendly as gay, so feminist as militarily interventionist, because of some Which just aufrechtzuerhaltender or protective rights. Saubande.

About the Greens I speak so well known as not. I was however recently by an alert reader pointed out, and he sought it out, I had been reminded about, I believed him simply, it was already late, that I have to those stated times, you may not offend the rabble, by including it expects.

The FDP is irgendsoein Witzmichwasichweißnichtbiswohin wobbles just as much as possible around for the one that just comes.

The Union is already amazing; it has almost all conservatives and patriots systematically discards, but there is comparatively good. The AFD has bestowed in no time as Punch event, faster even than the Piratioten.

The Left Party is a kind of modern FDP; one has violently anticlerical and gay and lesbian and feminist and secular forces weltallgleichmacherisch set, umseiert simultaneously but Islam, in opposition to Christianity.

What bandits.

There is still the NPD. The Protection of the Constitution Party. Unfortunately, I have to doubt very entitled because of the constitutional protection for true patriots and conservatives and liberals and libertarians and even real total of socially responsible Sentient have much left. Each expertise speaks against it.

I will now times German and clear: "THIS is but a Scheißpuff!"

Everywhere on a clear preponderance of sycophants and traitors!

NO MATTER who you choose of which: you will sell you.

None of these parties also announces just what would do naturally in a federal election in their way any serious, namely stand up for Germany.

As I said, I do not expect the NPD now. The so-called constitution is protection.

The rest does not even have a donated hair from a ass crack in his pants. Freedom? Was not Schiller, who knew how to spell the word yet?

And, no, I choose no chance to loose small party pointless protests.

I stand by my call to active boycott of the election.

- Ads -

Share this post with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages with others.
  • Facebook
  • Technorati
  • MySpace
  • LinkedIn
  • Webnews
  • Wikio DE

Tags: , , , , ,

3 Responses to "call for a boycott of parliamentary elections (XII)"

  1. lisa says:

    "NO MATTER who you choose of which: They will sell you."

    Is that really more than once?

    I agree with you. You can choose anyone. A choice is something very important and weighty, even if the thought "normal" voters, he would be lost in the crowd and his voice do not count ... Every vote counts, perhaps not for the end result in political elections, but in the universe very well. Therefore, one can not choose the "lesser evil"., Because that would mean a certain extent, to barter his soul.

    The only phrase that comes to mind is to the elections, therefore: I do not choose. Not even the lesser evil.

  2. Magnus Wolf Goeller says:

    @ Lisa

    Many will not make things so energetically-universal view as overweight as you; I see them in basically the same way.

  3. Magnus Wolf Goeller says:

    @ Lisa

    "Is that really more than once?"

    I liked the same.

    I do not know how many people have souls to sell in the individual, so there can only make estimates. I think there are at the very robust five to eight. Stupid question. No, I do stupid, that I try out to give a quantitative answer.

    But sure I am that it, now I change the reference point, is more often.

    I saw after only men one after another not only in a woman as a Servant. The illusions were expensive.

    Properly skilled women in this discipline sometimes better off, their soul sell only temporarily, once, until that they milking him completely, to a rich idiot, he may only bring in a handsome honorarium to which to feast, alswie a ausgemeierter President aD

    The question of how often you could barter his soul in a life, remains nevertheless erörternswert.

    I would say that one three times already is quite good about it. You should to gain only this brand, take good care, have ever practiced.

Leave a Reply