"Alfhasolis" has done the job properly, made files for an election boycott leaflet graphically as textually clean into the net.
http://alfhasolis.wordpress.com/
My thanks and my respect for this.
His idea, choosing, where there is no choice to compare with the greetings of Gessler hat, is as easy as pie.
Download, link, distribute, print to print, distribute en masse, sing everywhere!
- Advertisement -
Share this post with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web with others.
Tags: election boycott
This entry was posted on Tuesday, July 23, 2013 at 11:37 and is filed under Education , Federal Elections , Democracy stored. Responses to this article can through the RSS 2.0 be pursued feed. It is possible on these products to respond or trackback to send from your own site.
Found a bug? Please let us know:
Please do not mind some typos in the articles, because
this m. E.
-not from the beginning there were
are corrected technician a few days
ALFHA
Hello Magnus,
Again and again one hears the argument that if an election boycott "any non-voter, as well as invalid votes or votes for parties that fail at the 5% hurdle to the other parties slammed." (Which was in about here irgendwo: http://www.rp-online.de/politik/deutschland/bundestagswahl/nach-der-wahl-hoehere-diaeten-1.3565617?commentview=true#commentsField-2632011
To what extent do you know your way there? Is this really the case? Or what arguments or numbers could refute this claim, if it were so?
After all, that would mean the election boycott would the parties or the party system dictatorship but only ultimately support again.
(What I would at least but still not move toward in a polling station, because I rely on the principle of non-recognition, which, I believe, that it again acts on a different level than the purely politically oriented boycott)
As far as first advance, maybe you can, if you to know something, as I will soon pick up again politically uneducated precious ink pen, the subject somewhere shortly.
Thank you,
greetings
Jermain
Jermain
"Which, I believe, that it again acts on a different level than the purely politically oriented boycott"
On more than one more ...;)
L & L
@ Jermain
It is, of course, that you get with forty percent of seventy percent (turnout) provides as many MPs with diets, as many offices as forty of twenty.
Since in the sense must nothing be added, it is automatically that. (That'll tampered with invalid votes, if a particular party once again has 4.8% of these to create that 5.0%, of which I certainly have heard from a very credible source.)
The "other levels" on which the non-recognition of acts are, as always, difficult to assess, but certainly present.