Another absolute doublespeak reigns when it comes to the holy wars "of the West". But it is known, is deepened another time.
Thus intrinsically connected is of course the double-talk, wherever it goes against China and Russia (smaller evil I leave now before time outside).
There'm bad, very bad, to freedom of expression and human rights and democracy deficits are quite terrible.
While a right to the integrity of her genital organ, to be protected from serious injury, arbitrary mutilation us not even male children admitted, already can lead doubting certain historical events up to twelve years in prison, diverse, once totally innocent words such as "Negro" to Verfehmung, if not lead condemnation, only Jews are allowed to make jokes about Jews, while among child molesters only the very small fish are traced, even by the machinations of our already name wrong "constitutional protection" in connection not only with that ominous NSU not to mention, one U-boats continued on a country-consuming atomic power away, jihadists supports, trains, equips, where they are just acceptable, Euro-critics maligned by all means and placed in the relevant area, promoted violent "anti-fascists" with state funds, German hostility sanctioned everywhere, promoted homosexuality and hostility to children at all levels, against forced prostitution hardly anything is done, mass immigration, especially cultural stranger systematically promoted in social systems, the Treaty of Lisbon broken several times, the German people got forced on the euro, Germany remains UN-enemy State, one bulbs prohibits, but not private helicopter, Bilderberg conferences also safety-cost-oriented, although ostensibly private, the taxpayer burdens, a war of aggression by one instigates and leads, is it but, every day, especially very bad with these chauvinistic Russians and dishonest, deceitful Chinese ,
No question: Could it, so you would fall over these countries.
What is missing is that you, as before, when there was the GDR still says (I heard this kind of already did): "Then go over there!"
Absolute double-talk.
- Ads -
Tags: China , Russia , UN-enemy state , constitution lie
German hostility sanctioned anywhere ??? Sakrosant!
@ Electrocat7
German hostility is most basic civic duty.
Magnus
Wow, but you were in drive today! So this would be my favorite part, but let's see what part IV still holds ..
@ Magnus
Quote: Doubt can lead to certain historical events up to twelve years in prison
You know that I tried the last days to make me smarter about the subject and now I'm a little confused to say the least. Who says what in Germany other than what is "generally known" (this is precisely the formulation of the Bundesgerichtshof) on the subject, is punished with imprisonment! Therefore one must deny nothing, only a false victim number to call is already punishable by law!
Just what is "common knowledge"? To 1995 were in Auschwitz large panels that here 4 million people died. As of 1995, the stone tablets which were replaced by bronze, on which is written, that here 1.5 million people died.
Well this is a Polish matter if their museum director the boards with the number that the former Soviet Union has determined, in agreement with the Jews in the world scientifically, by other panels can be replaced with other numbers.
Contrast, is currently in the German Internet encyclopedia WIKIPEDIA at Auschwitz a number of 1.1 million fatalities, who has written in there and where it is hosted, I do not know.
The former Mirror editor and Jew Fritjof Meyer has however published in 2002 in the issued by the Bundestag President Rita Siissmuth magazine "Eastern Europe", that there were a total of 510 000 deaths in Auschwitz. A court case in Germany because this publication has been discontinued.
What is currently "well known" in the legal sense of the Bundesgerichtshof of the figures in Germany, I do not know. A "recalculation" or a "result Open discussion" is certainly also criminally prohibited in Germany, ditto in Austria, because the result just it is "common knowledge".
As written, I am a little confused whether these different publications on a "well-known" fact and since I do not want because of confusion in jail, I think probably the best times further to 4 million deaths in Auschwitz, as I learned in childhood have ,
@ Anonymus
What you say to the issues raised by you topic, I first have nothing to add. I assume that you have moved in with you simple statements of fact in the context of the given expression. They are, to my knowledge, correct.
@ All
I ask that this matter is not to elaborate any further.
The UN Human Rights Council may well still just talking ...
http://www2.ohchr.org/english/bodies/hrc/docs/gc34.pdf
That says it all ...
@ Dude
Yes, you may quote the UN probably. (I hope you quoted correctly but You forget this -. Very important - not that the Federal Republic of Germany is still a UN-enemy state, we are without rights..)
There will certainly be quite a German translation of the passage cited from you, but I'm trying again now anyway because:
49th
Laws that make the expression of opinions about historical facts are punishable imposed incompatible with the obligations that the alliance participating contracting states regarding free speech and expression. The alliance allows no general prohibition of the expression of an erroneous opinion or an incorrect interpretation of past events.
Restrictions on the right to freedom of expression should never be adopted, and it should never exceed in respect of the freedom of expression, what allowed under paragraph 3 or offered under Article 20.
49th
Laws did penalize the expression of opinions about historical facts are incompatible with the obligations did the Covenant imposes on States parties in relation to the respect for freedom of opinion expression at d.
The Covenant does not permit general prohibition of
expressions of opinion on erroneous or incorrect interpretation of past events on.
Restrictions on the right of freedom of opinion shoulderstand never be imposed and, with regard to freedom of expression, They Should not go beyond what is permitted in paragraph 3 or required under article 20
Paper is patient. This fully with us for the ass.
Magnus
"I hope you quoted correctly."
Well, that should already be so, except copy / paste would have changed anything ... but can be checked in the below attached link like where I does not expect that this is necessary because normally gives copy / paste a 1-1 transfer.
Ps. Thanks for the translation! Just now the alt-text enclosed in the imprint. ;-)
There was already one, but that is defective or not as precise as your here.