There is hardly anything Idiotischeres as an article that seeks to explain its own article.
But first to the explanatory article is not a real article, but rather a Beinaheaphorismus. (Aphorisms we may not explain well known.)
I wrote under the title "From Blog to Lall":
"Blog is stupid. Drum Lall his name. "
This is about sovereign and sustainable applied sociolinguistics as a serious Defendolinguistik necessary, rigid precise Bello linguistics.
(Note also to the following Kommentarstrang: https://unzensiert.zeitgeist-online.de/2013/05/23/verlogene-obergranatenerzarschlocher-ii/#comments )
Moreover, in principle, an important, often little attention stratagem. That fact, which reads: "Ridiculed? Set more than one better! "
As traditional media, at least in the German-speaking world, the poor, beleaguered, which give them any Possible, everything and everyone, what and business terms "blog" and "blogger" was told, as amateurish, nebicht, irrelevant reduce, I make it a nail with unverfehlbarem head: This page is a Lall, I am a Laller, a laugh of all.
You could, alternatively, of course, say: I lolle on my Loll everything Ollen.
This choice has the advantage that "lollen" and "Loll" blessed with an excellent connection to the network language.
I personally like but "Lall" and "Laller" far better, not only because everyone knows what a Laller, but also because to me the "all" in Lall more appeals than the "oll" in Loll.
Let's see which version will prevail mainly.
Of course, nothing prevents both depending situational, pragmalinguistic apt to apply.
Also, for example, in Lower Franconia "Lall" "Loll" the difference, ie, olso, many places already blurred before the fourth pint.
Therefore: This here is a Lall, or and also a Loll.
- Advertisement -
Tags: Bello linguistics , Defendolinguistik , neologisms , network language , pragmalinguistics , sociolinguistics
Magnus
"I lolle on my Loll everything Ollen" hopefully helps against "the traditional media, at least in the German-speaking world, the poor, beleaguered, which give them any Possible, everything and everyone, what and business terms" blog "and" blogger welcomed " as amateurish, nebicht, reduce irrelevant ".
All relevant ridicule is anyway the strategy generally used the Massenemedienlügner, the Nichtdaswasist-writing expert, non-journalists with statements.
With so many lies we can not "Loller", "bloggers", "power publicist", "Laller" or whatever sowieo after.
People tell me, lies have short legs, apparently not so short:
"To this day there is no such thing as a independent press in world history. You know it and I know it. There is no one among you who dares to write your honest opinions, and if he does, he knows in advance that they will not appear in print. I will get paid every week, stay out my honest opinion of the newspaper, where I am employed. Others of you are paid similar for similar things, and any of you who would be so foolish as to write honest opinions would be on the road and would have to look for a new job. If I publish my honest opinion in one issue of my paper, I would be my position within 24 hours of going on. It is the business of journalists to destroy the truth, to lie outright, to pervert, to vilify, to lick the feet of mammon, and to sell the land for their daily bread. You know it and I know what it is for a craze to toast an independent press. We are the tools and vassals of rich men behind the scenes. We are the jumping jacks, they pull the strings and we dance. Our talents, our abilities and our lives are the property of other people. We are intellectual prostitutes. "
American newspaper publisher and Heraugeber the "New York Times," John Swinton, 1880
@ Armin
The quote I read somewhere in advance, but it's great that you anbringst it here again.
That is what, among other things, here, on this Lall.