Again: the other writers or my texts for holding worthless, they do not read, do or link - why? - Steal on their side.
If I simply can take anything for free, where it just stands around, because one was so pointless to portray it, use it not only for myself but also for resale, it should be right. But before that I will smite this matter until that runs out to the hypocrites the destructive breath their art despicable lies.
What if one of them has a picture painted?
Can I just take it then, just canvas, frames and colors, maybe even pay for Brush Cleaner distance setting?
The museum purely traipse, of course, to pay wages without entering the museum make people so voluntarily, take a Renoir, at the output plunk down a Fuffi?
WHO IS HERE corrupt?
Does that but, consequently, your bullies, too!
But then comes the police. And do it fast. And it is jail. So you have you chosen us your chickenhead cowards.
Your filthy arguments I will not nailed to the wall until you run out of words.
You are so stupid, apart from your complacency and greed that you do not even notice how your conceptual back in the days when you could just be Poet Laureate, or starve. Your Alldemokraten and wannabe freedom heroes, hypocrites, decomposers, idler and flat heads.
"Be happy when you are robbed: So you'll probably at least a broader circles known!"
This is a one of kind Sottisen secreted to only that one instead robbed the word used widely.
Obergranatenerzarschlöcher, stupid coward.
- Advertisement -
Tags: Stupid fig
Magnus
"" You should be glad if you'll robbed: So you'll probably at least a broader circles known! ""
I can only agree!
My writing is my baby and some respect for what I hinbastle in forced labor, I find it the least.
Although I use quotes also creative in my articles, but short and ALWAYS the source - and often translated - with the purpose to refine a statement to corroborate, substantiate, and the ability to provide the reader with links to interesting publications on the subject to inform themselves deeper.
For this reason I do not like particularly the term blog, which is imminent often equated with amateur product, is not respected enough.
We provide (digital) publications into the net, equal in quality and often but - I would say - richer and with more devotion filled than some print media.
If that means what we do blogging, then the mirror or the NYT blogs also. We provide a medium available, which one should / must pay proper respect.
Anyone who does not is a fool, a thief, an asshole.
So go absolutely agree with you in this relationship and understand your anger.
@ Armin
The quote is, although not exhaustively regulated precisely, because that is impossible, but who has grasped the basic idea can handle it useful.
I am happy because I sometimes - I'll probably somewhat paranoid - belatschert to the effect of do-gooders only see what I had for a stubborn Depp yesterday with my attitude, that you understand my anger.
Yes, now there is anger.
I no longer accept the Geseich and Geseier it. I also make no compromises.
I have (see Außeridische deception) together with Rainer Grzybowski "Discerning Alien Disinformation" under "Creative Commons" translated, and that was not a little work. But that was my choice.
Should I even have one of those loafers and Hosenpissern tell, I walked in the money and greed paths. I arrived there. As of now there are only Treat, Friends of the night. I have long, probably too long, tried it in amicable.
Attacks, if you have the ass to in the pants. I invite you. Full-rim. Heard enough from your loose talk. Butter by the fishes. I'm looking forward to it.
The Magnus, let yourself be told is the long good-natured, but eventually it reached him.
So weigh, if you want to dare your words well, dear read everything I've said about it.
Armin: I'm sorry that I'm just slipped into this intermediate tirade, because I actually answer you.
I no longer fumble around now though. It has writers thrown us on the web the gauntlet. Again and again, from many sides. I'll take him now unmistakable.
I'm looking forward to my opponents.
Magnus
If one steals your text that alone is already a proof that he or she your text is something of value, otherwise he or she would want to steal this little ...
Only rarely is a value measured in money alone ... which is anyway only air ... as soon as they stand with the Güfeli in the bubble ... however, thank God, are not there yet, and it slowly forms more and more resistance and resentment!
Armin
I blog not, but run a page, just like you, only on a different platform or software;-)
Magnus What is supposed to serve with all the people you here as an example for your nagging and Ge have? Do you have this also asked whether they want to be part of your stories? Get them out of spot and scorn something worth living to you!
@ Hate heart
I recommended to you before, under the heading nachzublättern "Beautiful", perhaps you might a few stories of Constantine Eulenspiegel. (Search function above right)
"Have you even asked them whether they want to be part of your stories?"
Oh woe. Should I Mr Obama, Celente, fishing, Broder, every Tom, Dick and Harry also, now first ask permission if I could include them in my stories?
Think times. The harm does not necessarily or always.
If you want to include in any case one of your stories me once, I have no problems with it. (You do have already done in the rest, and very unfavorable to me by you under those counting test me, should eat grass. Was just unfortunately do not mind. A "sadhu" regretted here ever, that was not Tibetan monks still alive the skin had peeled off. Others called me giant asshole, whatever. So what? As long as something of a no comment here contradict other participants, not twenty posts such Content set one behind the other, I do not care.)
No, but then you could have asked me, or all those vegetarians where you are met and you by God or appointed yourself feel abzulästern about them and this, although with rather fantastic words than this but can not carry a washerwoman with a lot more substance. Because it's not about to enter the Komflikt and the people you mean something mitzugeben, or her, it comes out as a museum to create where you where you're apparently already met the ausstellst "idiots".
But you are, of course, the top maker of extremely pisses the mighty of this earth to leg ... why also since your start page changes the world into a better one.
@ Armin
I quote Armin:
"Although I use quotes in my articles and creative" end of quote
Have you ever thought about also because what you're doing to other so?
http://jochenmitanna.wordpress.com/2013/05/24/das-suffer-the-often-not-longer-quite-so-young-zitate/
Jochen
I quote Jochen:
"Have you ever thought about also because what you're doing to others with it?"
Have you thought about what we're doing to us with mutual citation;-)
Dude
"I blog not, but run a page"
Eben, you are running a site are running a publication on the web, you're a journalist. While a blogger is also Ok, but I've noticed that if you "bloggers" is the name that is somehow taken strange. What is the difference between NYT, mirror, Observateur, NZZ etc etc in their online dress? Or do I have around the straining Print a few copies, so I can call myself PRINT MEDIUM, then make your own press passes and be a real journalist?
@ Armin
The word blogger is of course a bit questionable, and the media sheep make every effort generally to portray bloggers as little wannabes, what wonderful.
"Power publicist" would of course be a possibility, but you would have added only two syllables, even made a fünfe in exchanging blog through electronic publication. After forces made despicable we would continue.
"Network operator side" it would blow then even six syllables, would also not necessarily better. Blog and Blogger have prevailed lexically, and I see no handy alternative. After all, it is spelled in German as how to speak it, which makes the neologism relatively digestible.
"I have a blog" sounds now times less stilted than "I run a network side"; Moreover, the latter statement is also misleading, because each Bauschlosserei nowadays a network side has / runs, but so that any blog.
I mean, we should be there, wofern no genius, found fully-hitting, concise German Alternative (which would still have the disadvantage that they would not be readily understood internationally) Do not leave, intimidated.
After all, there are certainly more good political blogs, as good newspapers with core part of politics. Is there ever a good newspaper with core part of politics?
Attack, constantly working to deliver quality, of the bold is so characteristic of "quality media" (often down noodles only Reuters, dpa & Cie.) Is not just given; not whine nor complain.
THE stand still with its back to the wall, not us.
Of course, they seek their salvation in it, even worse write as many bloggers who sometimes accompanied drivel still incoherent, content and musical skill, as for example SPON (even walking) to put all the bloggers in a blind idiot and hit things.
But this is increasingly helpless. Do not be misled.
Will now eg Dude not see his page as a blog, so I will not call it that; (should not be wofern me once but still a relevant carelessness slipped through) I adhere strictly to it, since he has agreed to that effect.
For me this means "blogger" first one: I say independent, subject to directives in no way what I want. Alsomit this is a title of honor in the sense of (enough already, also legally restricted) art and freedom of expression for me.
Let us dance away on those. Circulation loss is their problem, and they have also created itself.
However, I'm also regular way "X writes on his side ...".
No error, always thinking about these subtleties; it may come up with many more, on our part which add, the only practical publish what they stopped.
Some of us have long since left those loafers and Vortreppenpolituraufträger among themselves. Many have already noticed, and there are always more.
Armin
I noticed that although, until you here's not anmerkstet on, but to me is the stupid anglicism 'blog (ger)' has always been contrary.
In addition, I'll take care of anyway have at most very rarely to such ridiculous platitudes ... I never called me anyway Blogger, and also said nowhere that I run a blog, because that would be wrong (please understand ambiguous)! :-D
Magnus
Publicist.
Ps. Laberbacke Or (small Scherzchen on the edge)
Magnus
Yes, you're right. I have nothing really personal against the concept blogger, but I run a news magazine and halt probably sometime a documentary TV station - and no "blog". I should also mention news agency, when I feel like.
The important thing is simply that we publish. That's what everyone else does. We are media professionals, stop me from Blogger if that makes independent. What's in a name, I will not stiffen it, yes. I am concerned here only about quality, about respect, about that one publications, even if they do not consist of ancient paper and printer ink, seriously.
I also have respect for mainstream media, which are not always as bad as they put down some. Those who work there, who mostly just a mouth cage and can not write, how they want, are just not free. Then they will for years by "journalists" ... sorry meant censorship schools funneled before they write their first sentence for the reader. The mainstream's part of the world's few, highly concentrated ownership moderately. The only thing on which I am a trifle jealous, the only reason for me as a "real" journalist is to be with a "quality" medium professional equipment and the possibilities you have when you can say, "Hi, I'm from the New York Times! "
@ Armin
"Have you thought about what we're doing to us with mutual citation;-)"
I did, do not worry. I'm Zitiersadist and -masochist in one. So I do not mind, or joy. But if you annoy me too much, then I'll get out the Bible quotes. But woe to those who should dare!
But what I consider to be much worse, is mutual latching of pages or even entire blogs. This is my opinion then too far.
But if anyone wants me to be latched, which can only be based on reciprocity, then he should report. I then verklinke him to me to nowhere. Rejoice her little children, that nothing has come to you. And immediately there will again be taken from you. This should be a lesson to you. (I'm sorry, at the moment I can absolutely nothing to take seriously.)
Greetings to all and no
Jochen
Network publicist, print journalist ... is it really matter, right? We speak here only of the medium. Sure, the costs are lower if you have a "network" -Publikation out there than having to print them in the appropriate edition. A movie is also expensive as a TV movie and a Youtube movie is even cheaper. Only this is ultimately a question from the media and not by quality.
Laberbacke is also a variant;-)
Finally, fill in the mainstream media, the well-known name in hochzentralistischen media empire, even every day their publications with a bunch Nachgeplapper, copied from news agencies, parroted by others, often make news out of nothing, inflate sensationalist mosquitoes to elephants on. Investigative journalism, high-quality content, multi-layered content, intelligent writing is right there also usually in short supply.
Armin
Speaking of copy and copy ... they even make their own Konserven… http://www.nachrichtenspiegel.de/2013/05/24/vertuschte-flugzeugentfuhrung-oder-offene-verschwendung-von-steuergeldern-beobachtungen-aus-der-eifel/
Jochen
"That's my opinion then too far."
I agree with you
Dude
Interesting article. Match with text modules and preserves. The one for years have to study journalism for that ...
[...] (Note this also the following Kommentarstrang: https://unzensiert.zeitgeist-online.de/2013/05/23/verlogene-obergranatenerzarschlocher-ii/#comments ) [...]