After the first part of "darkness casts no shadow" to a sometimes heated debate led to even enjoyable, I feel an opportunity to reload.
That only light, but not darkness, to to produce shadows in a position, therefore, is evident as explained sufficiently.
In yin and yang symbols you can see very well how light and shadow are mutually penetrate. As per a germ of a plugged in the other. This throws light also the inevitable shadow. And only the shade makes the light visible.
The Esoterem "light casts no shadow" but is obviously so sweetly, that it is not even like licking. It is also clear why. It suggests a paradise.
It is a kind verzückender spell that relieves the world. Alltriumph of light.
Actually, I could not care this saying. Just as "My kingdom is not of this world".
Yes, it could be me regardless.
From time to time but I'll find a spell out of which that could be I do not care. In any event, insofar as I was thinking only of myself.
If I do this, I am putting out a favorite, the grade developed a special virulence. This is not only useful, but also can be according exciting. But the hostility that one for collecting almost certainly are not rarely priced, postgraduate study object.
In this case, now I find it particularly funny that "darkness casts no shadow", my antithesis to "light casts no shadow", is simply not to refute, but the latter, as has been shown several times, at least very doubtful.
Already mean when the Goeller, who anyway may well tell tales, such as if the Christmas tree at it have the candles when he pleases, even the naked logic on his side. Since he is already scratched a bit, would be how easy it is today.
On the other hand, I have chosen this award exemplary only, so that the one or the other is feeling perhaps more accurate to think and less giddy excited faith.
Otherwise there is none.
- Advertisement -
Tags: Esotereme
No, of course you can not cast a dark shadow, but this is pretty stupid, because shadows can arise only where an object of darkness blocks the way of eternal shining light.
Therefore, the case is clear:
THROWS LIGHT NO SHADOW!
Mist was missing something.
For an object to the darkness can throw any shade, it requires absolutely light, otherwise the whole observation or question is completely moronic.
@ Dude
Well now you have it yes finally understood. In order to cast shadows, things need in fact of the light. Only darkness casts no shadow desired or undesired.
Magnus
That was when I read the title to part 1 me, of course, clear as day! So clear that it I aimed at something else.
"The eternal shining light";-)
@ Dude and Magnus
"Where an object of darkness blocks the way of eternal shining light."
So it was sun worship. The object of the darkness, the moon, which will bear no light of itself. Man, my German is bumpy today. When the Moon is then in front of the eternal (meaning for ages) translucent light (sun) is, then it's done. Then there is the ring ("ring of eternal recurrence" - to paraphrase Nietzsche), the Uoroboros that is particularly so adored by the secret brothers to ensure that they almost forget the real thing its worship the sun. That will not be forgotten, but already provides the Papa in Rome, and not just on Sundays.
"Only darkness casts no shadow solicited or unsolicited."
Taking time out of the universe everything out what is inside. What is left then. A darkroom ?! Then came Thor with his hammer.
@ Dude
It would mean "The eternal shining, transcendent light casts no shadow", so that would bring even not much, except a little productive spell, but would nevertheless be permissible.
It is, however, "light casts no shadow", and that is so generally speaking, definitely wrong.
Darkness, so lightlessness, casts no shadow. This is always true, even if they absolutely transcendent, eternal.
@ Jochen
I'm not a sun worshiper, you have contradicted regularly if you hießest me one.
But here, where the eternal light transzendeten the speech (not raised by me), you can certainly be stated something similar to sun worship.
And not the kind of one who is happy about the rising or finally through the winter gray peeping, finally free sun shining, her perhaps even dedicated a poem, but divine in the repeatedly denounced by you sense that. (After all, the sunlight casts shadows. Anyway, as I know that. Sol invictus is however quite often worshiped in the above sense. Burns it but too hot, so you'd rather go in the shade.)
@ Magnus
"It burns but too hot, so you'd rather go in the shade."
So keep even the Christians. If it is too hot in the sun, then they disappear into the darkness.
Regarding the word "forever".
What does this word mean? Sometimes someone just needs five minutes to wait while someone says so then not rare: It takes forever and yes again he says: an eternity.
For the time passes quickly when you're intensely in the matter.
Joshua 8:28 And Joshua cremated Ai and made an everlasting mound of it, a ruin, which is still there today.
(Thomas: I love you still!)
It would verify that this ruin is still there today. WHEn not, then the Bible God had miscalculated forever.
It is often in the Bible: "forever and ever". So how many ages are there? Two or more?
@ Jochen
I have just answered you already in Erststrange again, welcome here now that you and the word "forever" behind asking.
We face just sort of - and fortune there but not - before that something is endless. Without any evidence that there was the.
To this kind of heard repeatedly pointed out.
Jochen
The symbol of the sun is 'only' as a symbol to still describe the unspeakable can.
Ps. https://dudeweblog.wordpress.com/2013/03/29/sein-nichtsein-unendliche-verganglichkeit-in-unwandelbarer-ewigkeit/
Pps. The saying 'an eternity' is actually completely idiotic, because it would have to be glad 'half eternity'. ;-)
PPPs. Eternity is always one, because it includes everything ... so schmeiss away the Bible)
Magnus
"It is but" light casts no shadow ", and that is so generally speaking, definitely wrong."
From a materialistic perspective considered so, yes. But the statement is - at least at risk - clearly be aimed at the transzendete light as a male aspect of Creator Source. I recommend you the book 'light casts no shadows' not for fun again and again, because you hang mE. a pale ideology of materialism.
"After all, the sunlight casts shadows."
Wrong! It is the object that turns away from the light of the sun, that this casts shadows !! The sun's light is unaffected !! Man, how hard is to begreiffen the ???
Ps. Whether darkness may be eternal at all, I doubt, however, this still requires deeper thought.
@ Dude
"... Because you hang mE. a pale ideology of materialism. "
Since I just had to laugh but already.
If true, what you say, I have never noticed the first (which still would be relatively normal), secondly, well, pale, never had something like this.
The latter would then have an extra stupid.
But apparently you think that anyone who does not believe in what you believe, must believe in shit. I think at least judged to be very rushed.
(You get angry not so much about unregenerate like me., Making early wrinkles. According cosmic justice will at some point provide himself or herself to the light meter.)
Magnus
"But apparently you think that anyone who does not believe in what you believe, must believe in shit."
No, not at all. But I know the different world views and ideologies simply down to the last detail behind that is going but certainly not here let rot in the comment strand, which is why I always "throws light no shadow" on Risi's refer. Since everything is to detail shines through ... His article online (see the first comment in the first article) is good, but is of course an extremely abbreviated summary.
"You get angry not so much about unregenerate like me."
Do not I ... I just find it sad that so wise people like you are one (I know of few that concerns you what clarity and wisdom could possibly hold a candle to) adhere to a materialism.
Lieben Gruss
Ps. And as already noted, I do not share everything Risi says, although most of it. Its decryption of different ideologies is the ultimate!
So, here again a few thoughts on the subject:
When light casts no shadow, then the light is ever-existent? (How can something exist if no one can tell of its existence brings us directly to the question: What is existence)
Shadows can arise only when the light is killed for it. (Conversion to heat) is a stone on which now the light hits a murderer? Evil? Is evil always evil? Or is evil maybe only a human point of view? Does it depend on the position? From the perspective of the light the stone is a murderer. From the perspective of the stone, the story is quite different. From the perspective of the observer gives again a different picture. We should be careful with the concept of evil.
@ Thomas
"Or maybe evil is only a human point of view?"
If I einschlage your skull, I'll be angry? To something evil, it is but only the fact that people have agreed to adopt a law through that life has been told by his neighbor as worth as much as his own.
In the Slaverei this law is reserved for people who have been told to lower beings, so that they may be killed without this delay further consequences for the slayer by itself, because those who see themselves as superior beings, have agreed to .
If a private patient in our system will be preferred to get a kidney transplant, so may have then see the circumstances a cash patient. In any case, it must be a brain dead the light quite blown. Is the Privatpantient so bad, or is it not rather the system which is evil, because it will be good?
If a chicken chopped a worm and eats, is it evil? Of course not.
If a man chopped a chicken and eats, is it evil? Of course not.
If a chicken chopped up a chicken with its beak and eats, then it is evil. Of course not. It's just different.
If a man another man hacked with an ax and eats, is he angry? Definitely. - Why?
Something does not do as a human being after all.
Because that's evil!
I even believe that the concept of evil and is regarded as the ur-viles for what has arisen in our world by the fact that someone has killed a clan another from the same clan to eat him, and the remaining members have then explained from the clan as evil. The offender was then sent into exile, which then the "devil" was born. This vicious then roasted his victims because he had acquired a taste, always over an open fire. So perhaps originated the concepts of hell fire and torment of hell. What is known today about whether cast by the Romans in the gorge of Hinnom crucified criminals were already quite dead, as they then burned there.
Were the Romans in their eyes therefore evil?
No, of course not. They followed only their stubborn laws and these were good for them.
@ Dude
"The symbol of the sun is 'only' as a symbol to still describe the unspeakable can."
Whether you're "the unspeakable" say, or whether other "the unspeakable" and therefore eg YHWH say it, it amounts to the same thing.
The unspeakable is the opposite of what matter is. But then it would be the opposite. To be truly ineffable, it must therefore be even less than the opposite of matter.
The unspeakable is also often described as "glory".
Even for those who had written the below the sun just a symbol. A symbol of the ineffable. And it was then tries to put it into words yet.
Revelation 21: 23And the city has no need of sun or moon to shine in it; for the glory of God illuminated it, and its lamp is the Lamb. 24And the nations will walk in its light, and the kings of the earth bring their glory into it.
Up "for the glory of God did lighten it" is almost in order, if you have not appended the word "God". For a God who lives among people, the demands it back to a body. But where you take now since a body of a god?
This body must be different than the body of gewöhnlcihen people; he has to stand out from others. So it brings the body to shine. And how do you do that?
You can go up a man in his glory. That is, we must publicly let him pass into glory, to make then resurrect him again in glory.
Only alone with light itself or glory to himself, man can not do anything. Because that exceeds his comprehension. But a lamb, one of the bravest and most defenseless creature ever, so something can stand for the overcoming of all evil. Then, if it is publicly slaughtered by the evil side and then comes back as if nothing had happened. Then it shines above all and above all others.
This conceptual model then took shape in the form of the man Jesus Christ.
This conceptual model has only one error. Because afterwards there was suddenly twice the glory. The glory of God, which consists only of light, or rather of ineffability, and the human light, the Lamb.
We have then "The symbol of the sun is 'only' as a symbol to describe the unspeakable nevertheless can."
It turns so only in a circle. This then also noticed a couple of brainiacs and then went out of the circle, a triangle, a pyramid. This requires a little more spirit. With this came the doctrine of the Trinity - again a different way of thinking for the unspeakable.
However, the truly unspeakable is NOTHING. Nothing you can not see, not feel, and do not take what I know, not everything else is not, and you can not speak well, because it does not exist nothing. The Nothing makes a still mad because you want it to necessarily understand. Nothingness is not dual nor non-polar, it is not dark and not light. It is what is really unspeakable. Yet once came all out of nowhere. To understand this is not because of nothing comes nothing. So we think of an all-encompassing light than nothing, but this is all. Clearly, this light then as the light casts no shadow, and as darkness, which it then is not so, also casts no shadow.
Samuel Beckett once said something in the way: People always want to know what happens after death with them, while they should but ask first if they have ever been born.
Sometimes I look at our world out there to people who sit in any tin boxes and move from one place to another, until they no longer move in a wooden box, and then I wonder if this really is life, and if it is not, then what am I myself? And if the outside is life there, then I say frankly: So you do not like me! And although I 'herd' it must live, so this is not my idea of life. To live because it is a life that others have devised for themselves and ask me, as they see it as well. I believe that this is but for evil.
This procedure is evil and slavery. Welcome to the PDV) We are currently looking for a federal spokesman. The may also like to be versed in the Bible. ,) Only schwäbeln or otherwise hinterwelteln too bad he can not.
@ Dude
Again, I am liable to any materialism.
And, you brat, I'll reinziehen Risis book sometime. Hopefully the result of this exercise leads to no schism between us.
@ Jochen
Some of what you write, though sometimes is still somewhat bizarre, but I have the impression that you're always better durchblickst, you always continue to liberate.
Jaja: the ineffable, eternal, absolute light ...
@ Thomas
"Only schwäbeln or he may not otherwise hinterwelteln too bad." (The press secretary of the Party of Reason)
That's of course. For Schwäbisch is the precursor, as it were the springboard, the bridge in those backgrounds world where language comes to the clarity that the light only then may cast shadows when it just allows him.
That sounds even now not all the same very reasonable; with such lucid transcendence blinded you, therefore, especially since many voters from non-Swabian territories, so all those sad country bars where you would be happy, would break even only a dim light into the philological darkness, deromaßen that they are, at least initially, reflexively turn away in horror.
Thomas
"What is existence?"
https://dudeweblog.wordpress.com/2013/04/07/bewusstsein and-existenz/
Jochen
"Is the Privatpantient so bad, or is it not rather the system which is evil, because it will be good?"
Clearly the latter ... it's not about personal hostilities ... It is about the structures of this world (Sartre)
And the structures are supported by the inoculated pale ideologies and thought constructs ...
"If a man another man hacked with an ax and eats, is he angry?"
The man is evil in and out of ignorance (out), and thus conveys the malice. If the free will to bury the ax or to use it. ...
"Were the Romans in their eyes therefore evil?
No, of course not. They followed only their stubborn laws and these were good for them. "
Just ... the structures ...
"The inexpressible is the opposite of what matter is."
No, because the matter is as eternal neutral energy just sprung and also the source / Absolute / ineffable, and ever part of IHMIHR.
The existence region of indescribable as Absolute Consciousness (absolutely free of material corporeality), which contains all relative consciousnesses (and energy), but is beyond time, space and matter, because I agree with you.
"Glory" is nonsense. Founded in patriarchal delusion ...
"Just alone with light itself or glory to himself, man can do anything."
Exactly! It lacked the femininity, so the love as a female Urschöpfungsaspekt.
https://dudeweblog.wordpress.com/urquell-makes-all-his-and-lebens/
"Sometimes I look at our world out there to people who sit in any tin boxes and move from one place to another, until they no longer move in a wooden box, and then I wonder if this really is life ..."
No just no ... that's just 'existence'. Life is eternal, intangible and non-polar relative individuality in the Absolute individuality.
Magnus
"And, you brat, I'll reinziehen Risis book someday."
Your only chance (50/50) to really convince me that I am a charlatan crawled at risk on the glue ...;)
@ Magnus
"Some of what you write, though sometimes is still somewhat bizarre"
Then I isses nearly as successful as I wanted it. I'm still working on my expression and content, for a ar are 100 square feet, so it is still bizarre.
John 20:15 Jesus saith unto her, Woman, why are you weeping? Whom are you seeking? She thinks it was the gardener ...
Previously was always the gardener of the murderer, nowadays it is the newspaper boy.
"I have the impression that you're always better durchblickst, you ever liberate"
I never wear sunglasses and I find nothing now times more interesting than eternal life. In a square city to live, I imagine very cramped. And I heard recently, and I looked, and behold, all runes from the character of David star are malleable. What is wrong with this world? But I mean still: The Nothing could be found.
As for the Schwäbeln and also other dialects. Personally, I am very attached to my dialect and in our home is so well spoken. When I was visiting most High German times, which had moss in abundance and in the effluent, as I was in terms of dialect speech, said that would be anti-social. Since then, I still wonder what the "a" at the beginning of the word. Probably starts everything is social, with an "a". Something like asceticism and goodbye.
@ Dude
"Life is eternal, intangible and non-polar relative individuality in the Absolute individuality."
What is this life because in practice? How do you imagine it, if you participate it or have it held?
"Exactly! It lacked the femininity, so the love as a female Urschöpfungsaspekt. "
If something is there, but then something is missing, then that leads back to the old scheme, the dualism.
You associate femininity with love. Then what part of masculinity - the hatred, as Urschöpfungsaspekt? From whom the violence and the war was invented? From a man or was it a woman who has invented for the world of men these things, so two men will fight for their love? Maybe it also has the two men tricked, so they came to their money if the men have killed each other in battle for them.
@ Jochen
You Dudes vision and reasoning in turn exposes admirably as illogical in itself. Hardly occurs added the woman, so to speak perdu all pure light.
I would like to take this opportunity to highlight times how much I, especially lately, since Christ departed from you, your association ability and your times more likely Rhenish carnival, sometimes very deep and serious (sometimes both mixed subtly) guess linguistic games and voltes . Your perspicacity.
You witterst, not malicious, behind every still so obvious what appears coarse to fine lies and illogical conjectures and feel it, when present, very accurate on. That is impressive and extremely like me.
Jochen
"In a square city to live, I imagine very cramped."
Thank you! Did not think that I am bringing today grin. Greetings from Zion;-)
"What is this life because in practice? How do you it to you before, if you are taking part in mind and have it hold? "
Conscious being in eternity, completely independent of matter, space and time ind absolute bliss as divine individuality in the divine absolute individuality ... oh how I seen it .. I'm sick and tired of this moronic existence.
"If something is there, but then something is missing, then that leads back to the old scheme, the dualism."
No because God Father Mother - LOVE LIGHT - IS apolar ...
"What then is part of masculinity"
I do not Add the links here to my personal satisfaction a ... I can also watch porn ... but that's me already long too stupid ...
"From whom the violence and the war was invented? From a man or was it a woman "
A man ... because of a woman ... or a counterparty ...