No more children because ...
- Advertisement -
News from Hammelburg
Magnus Wolf Göllerlifte
-
New Release
-
Display
-
New on the published list
-
-
The current print edition
-
Translator
-
Available in the zeitgeist shop
-
Directories
... Life, a single Sch (m) ore.
The (m) in parentheses because people are never all agree. It may even happen that the opinion of the same people changes from day to day. - Today I do not want children because ... / Today I want children because ... - then there comes a point, then some would like to have children, but then it gets. But how bad is the annoyance when children are already there and they do not correspond to how she imagined. How can they get away again then?
As for the male offspring, so the disappearance was again let formerly relatively simple. They were sent in senseless wars. About the female offspring of bombs were dropped. In some places these things happened yesterday. Nowadays, all injected together simply healthy. Or sawed them the brain from kindergarten, better still from crib.
Then funnels it a them to want to have any more children. But dog in common, the effect is knitted to do the opposite. As the youth can hang the pants for a while - in protest against the adults. However, for children and youth protesters are people. Only in the brain, since they remain all children. It will be wanted children just new children. Immaturity of thought, it goes to the next round. Why not - No more children: up times one wonders? The (m) in parentheses is quickly forgotten. Life is after all only a joke.
@ Jochen
Just want a lot more conscious of no children, are saying that they are not from an early age in the state Indoktrinationsanstalten, might want to see the whole day, messed up. Their offspring A not easy to debilitating argument.
... I agree with the negation of the statement. No. 2 is already in production. ;)
@ Thomas
Well, that many lower-Looking just can not be tamed make.
Nothing goes on, is emotional, challenging and sometimes difficult as children. But a life without children is no life. As we know, the only, if you own any. But that teach people who sometimes do not have children themselves is impossible. Usually these people are lacking in this respect the courage - and I can understand that. Or is convenience: do not want to change too much their own lives. Keep comfort zone.
I also agree Jochen to a large extent. As it applies to defend themselves whenever and wherever you can, once you understand today's "game". But dewegen not to have children is the worst, unnoticed self-punishment and the tragic mistake you can commit. Especially if you yourself are perceptive. You waste a powerful potential for change in the future and gives the system so small at.
@ Thomas
I spoke childless, not from that they lived: but otherwise full approval. You say to the point, what is at stake.
@ @ Magnus and Thomas
"You wasted a powerful potential for change in the future and gives the system so small at."
Let's say from the year zero of our era to expect. Never Mind The people have had dissuaded from bringing children into the world, although it is often topsy-turvy, the world was laid in ruins and systems in which people live, trying to date on refrigeration seemingly mutually to surpass.
Where, I ask you, in all this time, the potential for a positive change in the future is abgesickert?
Maybe you can the current situation abgewinnen still positive. Then I am happy for you. However, I can not. What people do to make other people daily life harder and but stand there as if they always have the best for one in mind is to exceed ironic little more. And that's why I also wrote: "Life is after all a single joke."
"But dewegen not to have children is the worst, unnoticed self-punishment and the tragic mistake you can commit."
I think, however, that this is the smartest move, one can make to the system. But for that you have to completely turn his back on the world, and do not even want to lie to it, as if one could still remain in this world even after his death by his own children.
You profess you as opponents of the system or as not (fully) with the system consenting. Why are you doing to your children, and thus you of the suffering itself to carry off this fight each in the next generation to go?
Certainly there are times good times, days, periods in which you can be the system system and only the warm sunshine or enjoy a love that is revealed in the life (love the way that yet again only death gives birth). But what are these short times compared to all the rest of the time in which the system forcibly occupied our brains. If it did not, there would be no system opponents. But there are tons of. Even if they keep quiet and not publicly proclaim. These are precisely those who always say do against the system we can indeed nothing. But! - You can do something very powerful against the system. It namely not pay any more victims. Children are the most helpless victims out there. And if it really comes down to it, they will be particularly and first of all abandoned by their parents down. There are only very, very rarely parents who can even include jail (usually called us Beugehaft) just because they are trying to protect them from the violence of the system their children. But even so has been a large scale never achieved anything.
As a child and as a teenager I was ALWAYS alone against the violence of the system. I swore to myself then, I'm doing at any child (offspring). Not that I do not like children. Children are still having the friendliest and most lovable creatures, I know; at least in the rule. But there is no most pitiful beings as children of men. That's why I decided at a young age not get it today and I'm not sorry that I have no children. I am actually very glad that it is so. And for me it was and still is, the wisest decision I have ever made in my life. This world here, so I found my hand always, is not my world. And if it is not my world, then how could it be the world of my children? And why should my children, I would have that much to think differently than I do?
I find it interesting that my attitude coincides with what is in the Bible.
John 18:36 Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this world; if my kingdom were of this world, my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews; but now is my kingdom not from hence.
Because our children are not our servants, if we apply them in the fight against the system, which we were not even accomplish it in a position? Namely to defeat the system. Basically, parents are only the murderers of their own children. And to then return the murderers of their offspring be? How long is this going to last? About all eternity?
"" I want heirs, thus saith everything that suffereth, I want children, I do not want me, "-
But do not want to feel like heirs, not children, - joy wants itself wants eternity wants wants to return, all-be-forever-equal. "'
(Nietzsche, Thus Spoke Zarathustra, page 401-402 spoke)
If so is every indication, then my question is that of nothingness. - Nothing is wiser than all. And what is the pleasure? It is nothing.
@ Jochen
"This world here, so I found my hand always, is not my world."
Why, why you are here?
Only to find that out?
Reminds me of a saying of Schopenhauer: "Life is a fretful thing; so I decided to bring it to it, thinking about it. "
Jochen shall make appropriate largely exactly what my own thoughts.
However, I also understand Thomas.
Ultimately, everyone must decide for self.
Both sides have their advantages, and disadvantages, and I must say clearly that clearly outweigh the benefits in a deliberately chosen childlessness for me.
Best regards to you
@ Magnus
"Why, why you're here?"
That you ought to be able to answer you but yourself. I am one of the victims of lust, foolishness and selfishness of others. And since I'm here, my way is probably that of the Nachdenkers and provocateur, so that others may come to think about.
What the saying of Schopenhauer concerns - Magnus What do you do different? Also, you are a victim, but are now times here in this world and you put your skills and your mind to, in order to reduce the suffering of others in this world here and provide the selfishness and the madness of the forehead - example: Religious and ritual circumcision of boys and girls.
The madness of selfishness and sacrifice ceased when the victim would admit to themselves that they consider this world so going to be so selfish as to beget more victims. And that does not mean that earthly rulers were no casualties. Your selfishness and their tendency to insanity is only a little larger than that of the people to whom they can impose their selfishness and madness, because they allow it.
The apparently gone crazy Un North Korea calls for war and all his people's suddenly Un.
Un it were not for me today, I would go tomorrow.
Many Greetings
@ Magnus
If it were me as a person not know what it would take care of me?
Where I was before, if not where I will be back later.
And I would in my life beget new human life, then I made him a fortiori death. So then death in me has nothing. For I bear him not all from me. I see him cry so, the death already. With me he has his hands full. And see, it is all red - with anger. I love to be in his eye, a thorn.
Jochen, I think you overlook essential in your analysis:
The world has turned positive for the people since time immemorial. A roller-coaster ride, for sure. But the trend is steadily towards ever more freedom to more and more self-determination and to more and more knowledge. It is only a matter of time (perhaps a few thousand years, who knows). Only the short-sightedness of the people's fault that there are many setbacks in history. Also, we are just before or as a huge setback trapped for a long time in the harbingers. However, as to say, I throw my own life in the bin and renounce the most beautiful thing there can be in one's life, is what I wrote above: The largest self-punishment that you can do to yourself.
@ Jochen & Thomas
No, Jochen, doubt your eloquence and depth of your thoughts. Nevertheless, you jump in my opinion too short. Thomas brings it again so to the point that I have nothing to add to his speech first.