Degrees have the "Removable Marie" (formerly believed to be the "John", etc.) and the "Dude" (which is the name of my knowledge always so) in this Jesus-strand started a small skirmish with respect to their code names, which insofar as I, it will continue should, heel quickly redirect here. (Whether "Jesus" and a cover name was? Anyone know?)
I've written here by a sadly departed friends, the "James". He had this name is given at some point, even in civil life (except perhaps at the office), so that I only found out after his death, which Christian name he bore. He did not particularly comfortable. I will therefore not betray him again. Only so much that it was a very traditional, however not overly common German name.
Another friend - at a young age - was Detlev. This annoyed him powerful. If you wanted to make it fully on the palm, so you had to speak to him only with Detlev. Not pseudonym with which he ausbedang is to be referred exclusively because Detlev should be able to remain as anonymous Detlev - in which case I now call the pretty ordinary - German. (I do not know if he now again called Detlev, I lost it long out of sight.) Sure, why he wanted to be a Detlev. The name was then, possibly even with Olaf as a competitor, as a gay name in vogue. That he suffered not at all. Too much noise, too much smoke.
I myself never gave me a nickname, except maybe - I do not remember exactly thirty years ago - for a few hours in a slum in North America, where I wanted to avoid unfavorable questions because my white skin color was quite suspicious; if I remember correctly, I called me Michael or so, pronounced in English, which was nothing special, and I could easily remember my lie.
Many, however, do not realize how much their chosen code name says about it. I import times, what alias alias Jochen ... has just over set to change Marie:
'Change Marie says:
March 28, 2013 at 14:07 (Edit)
@ Magnus
"Stupidest codenamed"
How about "idiocy" or "incarnation"; "Hans Muff", "Puffsusie", "glutton", "scratches in the paint", "Nano Merkel", "Green Lily", "Superalge", "Cross Man", "death", "Archangel", "John 8:44" ... ..
John 8:44 as cabbalism: 8 + 4 + 4 = 16, sum of the digits 7, Pleiades, Satan came out of the constellation Orion - Clearly. They are not of this world, the. Addressees of Jesus The question remains - why are they even here?
"... I'm really confused in my head ...)"
I do not believe this, but I like it anyway.
A question on my part: If you prefer that I call myself again Jochen while then stay? I then look tomorrow according to your answers. '
You can see several things - but it also provides several Nicks - instantly: The man (St. Mary) is formed, it has dealt with the Bible with the Kabbalah, and he likes the Satan almost as little as the Deppentum.
People who really want to keep covered, or Peter or Sabine Lutz or call Carola. Since no one knows so easily, whether a real name, if a (r) on the way your name and gender reassignment.
But is called a (r) "Sportinus33" or "Kunigunde6", so is not only clear that none is so called, but also equal to some of the intent behind the code name. Sportinus33 probably does what to its low Latin, and he wants to annoy the Freemasons. Kunigunde6 want sex (at least took allusions provoke). In addition, both are very likely grew up in German.
People with a strong inferiority complex (perhaps they want such only suggest, but what you find out quickly) call themselves as "Apollo8" or "Mary Stuart".
Of course sometimes comes over a "Hare" without "Rama" or even "Krishna". But since it also does not take long until you raushat whether he wants to drive an optical illusion, or whether he still weghat a Guruhau.
Even the code name changers (. Exchange Marie / Punch et al, I know that he is not so stupid): Most of them think no one realize that they operate under different aliases, even believe that they make it a great fun could.
Unfortunately, these people are just for language usually much too uneducated. You must be a very savvy philologist, the endure more, if on the other hand, only one sitting, which in this respect his things has impressed on the other.
The type of sentence structure, already the Lieblingskonjunktionen, frequent adjectives, ductal and style altogether, of course, the content of the speech, the betraying those rounder rather quickly.
Is the pertinent suspicion once drawn, so there is no longer easily escape. The other is not so express it, but look carefully, even providing subtle linguistic traps. Then the thing is usually eaten quickly.
Let me put it this way: against myself or against a like those SEO I would be even with the greatest care with an alias dizziness probably not too long by.
- Advertisement -
Tags: code name in the network
@ Magnus
"Aliases dizziness"
To cheating from me. Sometimes I cover myself with names but like to. Now and then goes with me through my imagination, and sometimes simply must forth something new, even if it is just a new pseudonym.
To name Jochen I am come that's a long time ago and he with me ever since. Where that was when I met him, I remember exactly. I do not say it here but. By the time I found out, that let others enslave well with the name John, if I put myself first in the comment strand. But others were unfortunately fast wind of the fact that I tried to subjugate them and then the room was below me mostly empty. What I do not care, because I am a lone wolf. The refuse to be subjugated by me, the show only with how sporadically they are already alienated. From then until the time of join-surrender themselves and Islam, it is then only a short distance. How have here then submit to the Allah, they realize faster than they are being nice.
In contrast, I'm a very dear oppressors, on the table of the skin only times when it must be unconditional. Today is Good Friday, as it must be. The rest please delight itself in the three-hour eclipse about 2000 years ago. The then dissolved in pleasure on course with me. Hello, I Deckdamenschwindeleitrigkeit the.
@ Magnus
Here I start now my first attempt to subjugate myself.
"Whether" Jesus "and a cover name was? Who knows? "
Of course, Jesus is just a code name, in truth, he was called Immanuel.
Isaiah 7:14 Therefore the Lord himself shall give you a sign: Behold, a virgin shall conceive, and bear a son, and will call him Immanuel.
Or how many virgins there, ever undefiled mother of a son of God were? According to the Bible but only one, right?
Jochen
"Sometimes I cover myself with names but to be happy. Now and then goes with me through my imagination, and sometimes simply must forth something new, even if it is just a new pseudonym. "
Loved you for that answer !! The most consistently refuse to this question I've asked many to answer, so I do appreciate it very much!
Nevertheless, I stick with the name Dude, because why would I after all these years still change? Would mE. stupid to do this, so I let it. In addition Dude fits perfectly. :-)
Ps. Delicious subjugate cal pun! :-)
Pps. The Bible mortised waste. There is no immaculate conception. Maximum involutionary manifestation, but this is too energy consuming, therefore the physical manifestations were so created that they can multiply themselves without having to always make the energy-sapping manifestation process. Simple shit actually. :-D
@ Dude
"The Bible mortised waste. There is no immaculate conception. "
Perhaps the time had indeed been good stain remover.
Or Mary was not Mary, because of Joseph wanted to keep pure for marriage, but a Leaking Therefore, the only fought out the baby Jesus and then went back.
Luke 1: 35And the angel answered and said unto her, The Holy Ghost shall come upon thee, and the power of the Highest will overshadow you ... ..
If the Holy Spirit is only light, how can he cast a shadow?
"Overshadow" the word alone already makes this whole thing very suspicious. Comes now from shadow or light shade gives it, if only light is there? What then threw the shadows on the Maria? In the dark whisper is good.
* Lol *
Perhaps Jesus was indeed cloned in the pyramids. ;-)
Light casts no shadow. Learn more about this with me over there in the response.
@ Jochen & Dude
To clone sheep, but Jesuses not clone you. That would be blasphemy firstly, and secondly you can not even sheep herders Shirts clone. What do you want for ten shepherds on half a lamb?
Should we at Easter about in earnest shepherds eat? And what eat? What shepherd can simply place it on the lawn, he eats without complaint fat there, supplies wool, milk, leather, meat?
Jesuses are only imaginary cloned in the world network. The costly 'only a few electron movements; can afford to almost everyone.
Magnus
'm Still Vegi;-)
@ Magnus
Jesus is unclonable. Jesus is Jesus and point!
Luke 24:16 But your eyes were holden that they should not know him.
This means they did not recognize even then the truth. So it has remained until today.
When Jesus comes again? There are old men and where to sit well once, since they never get up again. Why should it be different in the case of Jesus?
Mark 16:19 The Lord now, after he had spoken to them was, received up into heaven and sat down at the right hand of God.
Contrast is here and it is by God himself speaking:
1 Timothy 6:16 Who only hath immortality, dwelling in unapproachable light, whom no man hath seen, nor can see; To Him be honor and eternal dominion! Amen.
Jesus sitting there in the sky next to someone we humans can not see. Jesus, however, one can see if one is filled with the Holy Spirit, such as Stephen time (see Acts 7:55).
Of Jesus it is said, he would be immortal. But above is that only God alone has immortality. That there is a difference between the two gods Son of God and Father is God, Jesus himself says: Luke 18:19 Then said Jesus unto him, Why callest thou me good? No one is good but God alone.
Which of the two has the power and who gebürht the honor? If the verse one goes up, then Jesus has this disadvantage.
The Bible simply contains too many contradictions and inconsistencies, as that they really could take only.
"Bi-Bel", if only the font name is ambiguous. It is the 'Bel of Babylon' in front and the prefix "bi" means that there are either two dragons now or that the dragon has two heads.
@ Jochen
The "Bi" You're all right; the second part of the word, however, is the converse of "leb": So (you had something in Jesus strand already indicated) "Live bisexual" wrong.
This is much more likely than your interpretation; a Swabian "be li (e) b" ie "'m loving" also seems unlikely.
@ Magnus
"This is much more likely than your interpretation"
As says the Latins: Nomen est omen ("the name is a character"). People were given a sign and a great many have been and are willing to follow this sign.
Essentially, it is always and above all signs that people are running behind.
That the "Bel" of Babylon in the heading of the "word of God" is included, I see at least one way or another as a sign. Because it needs no interpretation, in Bible word of Bel as syllable is easy with it.
The Bel of Babylon was an idol, perhaps it was in the shape of a dragon. So - Bible - to name the writing of God, even in the stands that you should absolutely avoid idolatry, is actually an irony. Why not called Scripture simply "The Word" or "Word of God"?
Revelation 19:13 And he is clothed with a robe dipped in blood, and His name is called. "God's Word"
The words "The Word of God" is a placeholder and it is not a real name. 'Bel of Babylon' but is a real name. And the blood could also have been used interchangeably for the color "red".
A red dragon, what it stands for?
Revelation 12: 3 And there appeared another wonder in heaven: behold, a great red dragon, having seven heads and ten horns, and upon his heads seven diadems;
In short, he is called Satan, the opposing caster.
I do not think I'm so very wrong with my interpretation.
John 3:13 And no man hath ascended up to heaven but he who descended from heaven, the Son of Man who is in heaven.
According to Revelation 12, Satan was cast out of heaven from God. That is the one who came down from heaven to earth, though not voluntarily. The word 'no' excludes all others. But Jesus would therefore be no. Been 2. But this then contradicts what is found in John 3:13.
So there is the wording of the NT only One who has ever come from heaven to earth. Which of the two but then the Jesus?
Jochen
Your interpretation to John 12: 3 suits in my opinion. perfect.
12: 3 = 36 = 666
That was only the most obvious of all decryption techniques. I have not found more sixes. ;-)
Greetings from the Nine. :-)
@ Dude
I woke up only simpler eights. Well, because that made me. Or is it so thought.
Allwo eighth leg spiders! Subject tert places! Wind from astern!
Even the property Tern.
Each box of his quail.
Yes, I laughed because I thought!
The nine in the Esoscheune.