I already heard of one that I otherwise quite take seriously, a true media professional, read more often appropriate, blogs were only secondary in their weights and their Bedutung, as measured by real journalism, the journalists exclusively produced from genuine, yet. Because they lived far mainly from that, would bring but almost only Kommentatorisches. Well, here are just considering what I do: In fact, I grab media topics, Featured chewed regularly on. The dpa is not mine, yes, but then it worked differently. Moreover, I have probably a few less daily hits than spiegel.de or bild.de. Even that's right. However, I prefer me not to this shoe. There are aphorisms, speech science, philosophy, various other regularly, which does not append to the Elaborate any established journalists. Even supposing that this would be the only German-language blog from which that can be said right, the general statement would be false (this said to me directly, my blog knows well, so I do not know why he then categorically expressed disrespectfully). In fact, many blogs are rather one-sided, hand-made bad, even stupid. And what's the mirror? Mass high-income journalists, and the result is one-sided, hand-made bad, even stupid. I could possibly blame here (also it would require quite some malice, so be it), this blog is one-sided. (Yes, on certain things, I have a clear opinion.) That he was but a skillfully crafted bad, even stupid? Since then I laugh but only. I publish not little use, in principle, not a spelling program, can not afford a professional editor. So stay times are typos, I, the text's own is now times on the treacherous, earnestly overlooked. Or even that I whether a rate change a grammatical or syntactical errors do not notice the same. Mind you, mostly just not the same. The whole argument is therefore, at least wofern this blog should be considered a blog, laughable. Especially since they will usually still put forward by people who could give me safe no more tuition. That leaves only the question of what drives them to assert such. First option: you are a believer system. Recognized is important, even if it's crap. Second option: you can not read properly. Third option: do not trust their own judgment. All three options may be mixed, even fall in one thing. It is deromaßen mentally down, primitive, regressive, that article because it only here, on a small blog that appears automatically good for less, has weight, because if he (which is as soon hardly happen) the star or the Focus published. Something appeared there. Since it is not an exaggeration of functioning, work-to-do brainwashing to speak. For me old-fashioned Kasper a text is a text. No matter where he published, written by whom. So I read, friends of journalistic night.
My system is spinning again, ate paragraphs.
I now do not care. If the text extends out just so.
