I will not mention his name. Because I do not want him. To the cart At least not yet. He will realize when he reads this.
He is undoubtedly blessed with a keen intellect, and he knows how to formulate accurate.
However, it does not always succeed, even if it is, superficially look so like. Why? (more ...)
I think I have already written about it, find the text but no more, so be it.
You can not go back, and that's a good thing, because otherwise soon you lived in an endless loop.
But you can still become what you are. Can you? No, you can not.
And you can but in the sense that the former radiance returns twice.
Nevertheless, this may seem only half as much, at least initially, as in the past.
Because they want to be not so clouded mystery of possible futures, one might be even more of fallen out of time, just as formerly, because it still remained to a degree that was digested and hereby interesting.
Was at that time already half jens the most, so it is now quite.
Most have stopped namely, often do rückschrittig.
This is especially true for our time.
I halve times now my previous lifetime, so look back over 24 years, the former around it. (more ...)
"My" network does not currently work properly.
I just had a look at an article was my hundred billion one thousand percent sure that I had already improved, corrected so as I saw him then also called.
I saw him again readjusted.
Where sadness mixed with relief at last, you cry well.
The idea that you have reincarnated somehow, something enticing, it has to be not explained.
Therefore, faith is it so popular.
I know all the pertinent models, however, are the evil that is because debt is based.
To the effect that you just appearance only would get a fresh start, as all antecedents were brought into the new determinant, since all debt, the debt, the negative karma, one may call it what you will, with.
Not a very enticing prospect for me. Since the asking price for me Again Shall life is too high. (more ...)
"All anti-racism is anti-white." (Aller anti-racism is anti-white.)
I do not remember where I recently read this quote, but he stuck to my memory.
Anyway, whatever you want to stand by it, Jakob Augstein is now on SPON best to confirm this assessment. However, in a very remarkable manner, as it occurs at the same time anti-racist, then a again - seriously! - "Positive racism" postulated. And even a mixed race of the future celebrates that was admired in Brazil as early as they arise. (I always thought that there are no races, only racists. Now what it's supposed to again, give at least one. Are Not the other races then? Unrassen? Pseudo breeds?)
But we read first what he there so everything is from him.
First at the alleged sexism of liberals Brüderle against a star reporter hanging, he lets go of, inter alia:
"This is not about Brüderle. It's all about the white man in America who has lost the election. Of the new Tarantino film by a black - which sits upright on horseback, therefore, comes as a gentleman rider - is shot down. And on the "Atlantic" reporter Hanna Rosin has recently written a book entitled "The End of Men." Brüderle is such a man, the feel all his critics and his defenders. "
Finally, a black gentleman rider, the white men down shoots. As the end of the men. Even the black men? (more ...)
I know one - beyond even by Rainer Brüderle - and I admit openly that I have with him some dirty joke in every kind of direction, tore a few weeks ago who said to me. "I was beautiful emmer sexist"
Known, the Muselmanentum has a simple solution to the problem that a magazine like the star or the offended star reporter but did not appear to want to be clear: the burqa instead Dirndl, harem instead work at the bar (worth reading, by the way, also funny that Claudius Seidl - not beer Seidl - on faz.net to write).
Jaja. The snail pushes it also already pretty doll. And only the lions and monkeys.
Nevertheless, it can not go on, of course. Namely, that men put on women, simply tap any awards. Already a fortiori when the woman is out to irritate. (more ...)
The first time my son woke up at the dinner table.
What in Latin something hot with road or tram, I should have asked half awake.
A little later, he shooed me again in bed.
"Dad, I have a headache!"
"Yes, yes. Let me continue to write and bring me a beer "- I babbled.
After all.
Latin, writing and beer: I know even längweis instinctively what is important.
From Saturday to Sunday, we discussed - despite Dionysik - but very seriously the idea of an unconditional basic income.
Of these two BWA fours advocated quite, she refused flatly from a (clearly related to the current situation, not any conceivable future with free energy, etc.), I was very skeptical.
Even apart from the fact that the unconditional basic income should be given according to all major initiatives each, so far no one has dared to say that this should come only Swiss respectively Germans, just not all the newcomers, then, conversely, even if this event is set, I could not fail to consider the arguments to that as obese, which assessed the negative thing. (more ...)
Just now I got to the post " Jesus a Jew? "once in a comment to the effect that Jesus was not a Jew.
This time I answered them:
"When Mary gave birth to Jesus was Jewish, and then he was a Jew. In any case, any common definition.
I feel it, like I said, do not care if Jesus was a Jew or not.
For Christians who want to distance themselves from Judaism, that may play a role. But: What is this?
Everything indicates that Jesus was a Jew. Why would he have us renew the "Old Covenant" should, he would have none?
You dare not turn away from the Old Testament is clear (which, logically, is not so easy). Herewith, the Jewish faith, but the love Jesus we would have liked as a non-Jew I find that childish.
The way it is, all Christians and Muslims are Jews. Or for that matter, more precisely, Subjuden.
The but many of them can not stand, so they cultivate then anti-Jewish sentiment. I can not do otherwise than regard as rather silly, ridiculous.
Thus, the Jews always sits more pull.
Happens to Christians and Muslims right. Ultimately, they want it no different. "
One may call me for the final statement as malicious. Here you go. (more ...)
The federal government wants to combat drones for future international assignments: buy (aka wars of aggression).
"Armed reconnaissance" was "absolutely necessary".
Now I know little Sprachpfitzler happy again, since when have you. Warriors, war here or devices that shoot, with what they have, as a scout, as "armed reconnaissance", referred
Is this a new translation from English? (more ...)
A few weighings for first article .
Really is so bad, is seeking a geopolitical agreement with China and Russia.
Wrong, so right, to follow the Brzezinski Doktin that encircle these two powers, first and ultimately destroy plunged into chaos is set to the factory.
Really is so bad is that the differences between the sexes not to abolish, not just ignored, even underestimated, says those.
Wrong, so really, is to promote the leveling of the sexes to their mental and physical infertility and finally destruction. (more ...)
"The honor of the Malian military leadership is at stake."
Thus, the French Defense Minister Le Drian. At reports of murders and rapes by regular Malian army soldiers during their joint with French units advancing north
Well, the man has time to worry.
If the matter is not so cynical, hypocritical, it would be laughable.
The French army bombed cities - which has not disputed, but said yourself - where, we understand something from surgical air strikes, as in Libya, of course, no civilians were killed. Everything honorable.
Otherwise: What did you expect? (more ...)
I ordered another thought about the questions raised by Jon Rappoport made (German translation by me) destruction of logic. (To Jon's original English-language articles directly here .)
Not only that, as he shows, sight unseen an idea, an idea, a concept, therefore, may be condemned unchecked, because it comes from an unpleasant person: the thing goes on.
For instance, have many animal rights activists and vegetarians without ever a pig have only personally insulted or attacked or invaded its stables, must listen that Hitler had indeed been vegetarians.
Not only that, many were already directly insulted as a Nazi, as well as Hitler vegetarians.
And: Can I now that I'm not a vegetarian, possibly be a Nazi? (Why should it now be a stupid question?)
And: In fact, the Nazis adopted 1933, the first animal protection law, made himself strong for species protection. Should we abolish the welfare why again? As many species exterminated?
Drawn in the United States is of "conservatives" (see, call themselves mostly so), and some "libertarians", often a line from the German Natonalsozialismus to animal and environmental activists (including those who do not undergo climate atrocity propaganda, only against nuclear power are ) or fracking, genetically modified crops, etc..
So you have to be against animal welfare, food for nuclear power, Monsanto corn, every day for three chips, it will not to be a Nazi? (I am the way, is not aware that from 1933 to 1945 anyone in Germany, had been forced out by the incipient disaster of war, to become a vegetarian. I do not even know of a great propaganda campaign was from eating because of meat "un-Aryan" , like "un-" or. Should have given it, I will correct it here nachreichend of course.)
Clear that environmentalists now - still crazy? - Supporters of Monsanto & Co as "Gennazis" call to insult people who reject climate alarmism, Al Gore & Co. as "Climate Nazis". (Monsanto with "national" to do a thing, any more than the Klimakatastropheten On the contrary, international, it is hardly possible that extent they were, though -.. Although the appeal strange little - as "Geninternazis complications" and "Air Inter Nazis" to designate.)
Clear (yes: CLEAR!) That the comparison of "climate deniers" (as if one denies the existence of climate) with "Holocaust deniers" was already taken, and often is. (more ...)
Courtesy of the American writer and journalist Jon Rappoport below an article by him in German translation by me.
The content is - though country-specific references, of course play an important role - in my opinion have to our situation in Germany, so at least Western Europe, transferable. You may safely assume that I had good reason to ask him for permission to a German translation and publication of the same here. Thanks for the approval here again to Jon. (Thanks Jon!)
For English-language original can be found here . ("Matrix programming 101: destroy logic")
Programming Matrix 101: destroy logic
By Jon Rappoport
10th January 2013
www.nomorefakenews.com
Once, at medieval universities, enrolled new students a the Trivium. It was the core curriculum. It was required. His part consisted of: grammar, logic and rhetoric.
Grammar: the internal structure of the language, and the parts of speech, and the correct match of parts of speech.
Logic: the valid and invalid connections in the course of an argument, the correct method justification, the deductive connecting links of a chain, at the end of which is a conclusion.
Rhetoric: oral presentation, the use of language, to create a case, the ability to persuade even the face of a counter-argument.
Today the technical subject of the trivium is not only downplayed. He was crushed.
This article revolves around the death of logic. (more ...)
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
