Earlier, she was there again: the temptation for corruption.
It had been building for a long time that I thoroughly once the Beuys' concept of art would take apart.
Now it was just Lisa who leaked me the ball.
Not only that, they have often brought here interesting thoughts. It also seems to be a woman yet, and I'm so old-fashioned, maybe even learn to live, that I resist the idea of women do not like hard antrete
Rather it would have been, in fact, my friend R., who is on their line, or another, would have me here Beuys thrown on the table.
It would be cowardly, was corrupt, the ball is not the statute book, only because it was one of my (supposed) woman, the answer I have for next note some sympathy, played into the box.
Perhaps, it did not surprise me, they never speak a word to me.
This is certainly not what I want.
But: If I had to submit to this fear?
I'm not the first place, truth, wisdom, as I see it, has assigned?
In this connection, it's different than other times.
I have often been spared women, where they welcomed me the latest or appropriately treated me well and yet what else to do it, in my head rang already ready.
Never mind, you can choose for yourself if it's just a personal situation, maybe even a few others, is.
But here goes, because this potentially reads each.
The responsibility is another.
It is in such a place and not be allowed, over the extent of setting a woman bonus. Because that would be a betrayal of all the other Ernst wishers. Just corrupt.
I'm writing this out for two reasons.
For one, I did not want to hurt Lisa, I'm trying to build a bridge. I "lose" they do not like.
Secondly, I address all workers, especially those who create with the word.
I would composer or painter, I could certainly hide my thoughts factory way better, while not falling prey to corruption.
As a writer, you should not therefore start, while it is permissible quite much to invest in text deep layers, especially that which can not be said, not accessible to everyone, resist one for coarse cake detectable, there are fundamental issues of this kind, you wofern whether Opposition not to lose house and home and neck, threatens no choice.
Possibly those to become Schlunz. This is easy. An easily-held public standard.
The Schlunzentum crawls to a fast. There is the danger of dangers.
Only one will be, a fallen, him not to hurt her, then more, eventually all. And in the end you are then in Beuys, erschlunzt.
That is of course, not that it was necessary to connect all the same hardness with each; decisive but must never be left to the malice of Halbirgendwiedochoderauchnicht.
This is not always beautiful: Those who do not endure but that should guide will Hohentwiel or streetcar conductor in Heilbronn. (I do not even know if there are trams in Heilbronn, but that's irrelevant.)
I do this anyway once again written for almost anyone but myself.
Knows only one, besides me, has the effort all worthwhile.
If not, I have just practiced besides cooking a non-vegetarian Bolognese sauce, a half or even three quarters of an hour.
- Ads -
Tags: Mandatory
