The end of the philosopher is a certain kind of inner strength.
A philosopher who has found his peace, no longer deserves the name.
He is good at best even as an undead.
The wisdom of fact, as already said any of them is a woman and always loves only a warrior.
That's why - I just pfitzelte reader with Lisa again around it - I will be so far at least certainly not "enlightened".
Not only the liabilities side be bothered; it is the ultimate, inherent in that condition in my view.
Lisa sees the reader but obviously quite different; as far as I think I have understood their designs, it glows in the Erleuchtetsein just yet still more.
That would, paradoxically, already an interesting thing. I looked at me then at once.
I do not trust it though; nor do I find my relatively underexposed life exciting; much of what I wished like missing in it; but it's with something new every day.
However, that just as the Lisa seems to think (insofar as I but it should have reasonably understood), namely that one can hinanschreiten of enlightened to still lit, I would probably have liked it to me.
Paradox is not necessarily wrong. I know as a passionate Dauerparadoxer long time.
Nevertheless, I am abgeschwiffen.
The task of a philosopher for me is the fact, not only to recognize themselves, as Lisa aptly said, to ally themselves with themselves, but also to express themselves.
Said another way: Who takes the wisdom for himself, arises out of the world, hereby against them. (This is now initially very simplified, but it should be understandable.)
Again told vividly: I like to drink a beer times with people, and I have my children I do not even have to anzwingen in making. And I still love her, even if it is sometimes Granatenrabatze.
Without courage (the Anglo-Saxons have done so out of "mood" about the German "mood," what if I do not know quite, to "Luna", so the moon is based), the courage of the attacks, the philosopher may stand on his enlightened place, but can no longer be his principal task, namely the giving of the searched and Records Found.
Why Lisa's point of view, is that it speaks well; no long ramblings, clear sentences.
But from so the philosopher must not be blinded. Yes: Few are able to speak well, but those who are in this respect have so far absolutely right.
And here we come to one of the greatest dangers, one of the most common surely fall causes of philosophers, namely those that he sits facing the speech.
But he stands there and hear good speech.
It is to him, as though erupted around him at once all the light. DA! - Is one or one that talks! Word light!
THE loves him (because the philosopher has ever it with the words) intoxicate the senses, wegzirzen him, bring him down.
Since no man that hath understanding, usually rarer still a woman, good speech is the philosopher probably the most dangerous threat that is not filled in wine bottles.
What helps?
It's the good old linguistics, the queen what else.
Deep breath, every word, tap each particle.
So he comes to his senses and the senses.
His Urgrundübung alone saves him from the abyss.
By respects to separate beauty of truth again.
Reflection. Cool heads in the glaring light. Do laaangsam. Better put first, as a fall. Again raise snippets with the small Zängelein and look closely. Just after the old rule: Especially not, or if then only controlled (or at least reasonably controlled) by turning.
Once the vertigo overcome, not too early to get up again, after hint and front and if unt and looked, and it may be the ground still stagger, but not overthrown is.
- Advertisement -
Tags: enlightenment
