As the philosopher learns

As a philosopher, you should first and foremost know his own weaknesses.

The only way to assess their own judgments, regardless of whether it wine, women and song, or how often, and yet all Dreie a Fourth and Fifth.

A penchant for singing can lead to it, that you too loud and wrong and the wrong time in the wrong place sings, half of the wine pair of good shoes can drop you without external intervention, the woman's sake one can lose his voice while still Bouteille.

Therefore, the woman even more dangerous than drink and chat.

But well, that's been known for millennia, but for safety, I have mentioned it again.

In any case, it is important to make the next pre-and prudence with respect to the judgment of the respective weaknesses in the sense virtues that the resulting tension between mind and Dackelhaftigkeit targeted uses.

Even the practice can in fact, learn more and more.

WHY, HOW I was already stupid like that?

WHAT did it start?

WHAT was the stupidest, most revealing, most ridiculous sentence?

WHAT, WHEN triggered the loss of control?

I wanted to lose control at all, and if so, WHY? WHERE?

It also does not hurt to approach philosophies that one, even if they could surprise respects, are quite hardly.

This is probably why chinese and I japanere around each other for years, that I sometimes wonder why I still get no slit eyes.

Of the rest, namely, the inner harmony, the equanimity, I understand with soon fünnefzig years still not too much.

Although I understood the concepts fairly well, they think it is not even in their sleep by more than 5 minutes.

While this is one part annoying, on the other hand but healthy.

Because as a philosopher should not be a wimp, and it applies not only the ever-expanding what we can, but again and again, a thousand times, to ask what one, although it is somehow ignored, obliquely.

If it is possible to establish analogies between what you have mastered to some extent, and those spheres in which one fails regular way, so you have already done a not insignificant step.

Leave this to, what holds the world together, closer.

In the ideal case, one takes one to strangers so that you finally charged with what is actually a.

The decisive factor may convey what? Stupid question: the art of course.

Which means that you are, in the image of said recessed into each tea cup.

The aesthetic sense is one of the keys, if not the mat.

Where, as is such the Beautiful? How is it created? Who created it - internally as well as? - Behufe for what?

All questions to ask that after death.

I speak in first place, of course, with these considerations in Germanic. For which I am familiar from at least a bit.

Früge me but a Japanese or Chines' how he could come closer than we think, so I knew him well not much to say other than it just accordingly, but in reverse to try.

I knew a multi-talented Japanese woman (unfortunately too short), which in my view succeeded amazingly well and quickly. (Immediately she also liked our wine. Though this is not a big deal, but ...)

Of course, one also comes to the terms of their occupation, not pass. (Besides, you never want to say something, but then it is, at least according to my understanding, not a philosopher silence in itself is not a virtue, but only a non-action..)

To summarize simply: Imagine all the time just like the proverbial bull in front of the mountain and scrape.

Eventually, at least the front feet are sore, and if it made good, one even has a clue as to why.

- Ads -

Share this post with others: These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can find new content and share with others.
  • Facebook
  • Technorati
  • MySpace
  • LinkedIn
  • Webnews
  • Wikio DE

Tags:

4 Responses to "How the philosopher learns"

  1. Dude says:

    And what if I have incarnated himself into a Weibskörper? ;-)

    * Glasheb *

    Ps over a gebührliche answer I give tomorrow.

  2. Magnus Wolf Goeller says:

    @ Dude

    If you have incarnated into a Weibskörper, I do not own at least find out more detail. Wayward women I've met enough.

    They are, in my experience, not less frequently than stupid men.

  3. Dude says:

    * Rofl *

    No, I'm not here and now, of course ...

    It was more of a hint!

    With such an introduction You close about half of all potential recipients ever made per se ...

    's ... If we already have on the rarity.

    There's both sides of the!

    The speech of the Russian woman in the bar today, and in particular, what was behind it - in the speech, yes, but mainly in your - has me today proved again.

    It lacks the holistic approach in the extensive introduction.

    L & L

  4. Magnus Wolf Goeller says:

    @ Dude

    Half my wholeness is nothing for Stupid.

    Long met no more Russian closer.

    My last one was actually a Polish woman, and she slapped me hard across the face.

    Thus it can go.

Leave a Reply