Believers addiction is adjacent to and with the death addiction married the worst disease of a large part of all gifted learners.
A primitive, a fellah in the Nile Delta, the believer addiction makes little.
They have been taught him, he will let his sons circumcised therefore, on the Nile perhaps even his daughters, but psychologically it makes him comparatively, almost nothing.
He believed anyway to any shit dirt that set before him.
That may be a not inspire, but is now times a fact. A large part of humanity is still stupid. In one might complain, but better, it is allowed.
It is perhaps not always, but certainly often precisely those acting as intransigent stupidity, which also drives the gifted in their effects to Believe addiction. Here, then, it is often really sad.
Not Bruno, not Cervantes, not Confucius, not Nietzsche: No! The idiot determine precisely the thinking of those who should have really learned it.
I think Buddha and Lao-Tse, although a bit goofy, but even at that they no longer hear: what would at least be a start.
They want to "occult", which is tinkering of it. That would not be objectionable per se, they wanted to actually discover the hidden. Every self-respecting scientist cultivates his.
But NO! - The "occult" is to remain undetected! Up to eviscerate!
We see a compulsive substitute action: Therefore, I call it addiction.
Too little eternal suspense in their own lives; So, duration recipe: Believe addiction.
Since the Abahamitismus in the West in decline, but still powerful hintdran lasting effect, is, after all, a progress (really?), The doctrine of reincarnation become the standard palliative; maybe that's exactly considered low, even worse than the Abrahamitenwahn.
Because: This model offers even more opportunities for postponement, the third, nth chance to excuse prepares the cowardice of a better bed.
By just yet otherworldly "oriented" is.
That the current theory nor illogical, ridiculous than even those of Abrahamites comes in quite handy. They want the competition so may oppose something. Furthermore you will be happy to half Apart sheep.
You do not want to see. Any pertinent allegation is another hoax. Wider others like themselves.
Each detection namely ushering a loss of their own imaginary holiness, eternity, uniqueness. That does not see it that way.
Since that German scribbler, whose name I will not name here, said that everyone is an artist, so the last nail in the coffin striking modern in brains, anyone can feel like a big one, even if he only delivers Erbärmlichstes. Everyone is a hobbyist. Yes. A hobbyist around. A child with paper and something Bäpp. And the Zammgebappte becomes divine through whatever guessed Bäppen.
Babbles something, ripped, whom you want. Here is something else.
After that artist was, in fact, in his own way a fulfiller, brilliant: Each clumsy idiot was assigned to the Most High.
He provided so that the complementary image to god subjugated people: Everyone's giant thing! Everyone is a Titan!
THE swallowed the slack part of humanity like: it was like to him refreshment.
If I wore it before that I know as my view at least considerable visual artist, having already dead to me at least the two BWA from life, so he kindled This will probably not even a Gauloise in, told me probably only if I just was begun, pointless to annoy him or bored.
Only looked at one of his poorer pictures, and I would red in the face, or pale, or at least mute.
It may from time to time give a Mozart; there was also a Capablanca; but as a rule the way to art is long. Even Nietzsche had this out over the Knabentum, Cervantes was for that time already an old man (cripple it) until he knew to create his eternal Quixote.
There is nothing to do with the believer addiction.
Believers addiction leads away from Want: to somehow under the numinous protection roof, would like to.
Not even the essence of want, as it should, in opposition to the will is known to the disciples of some important.
Bad about by depreciate in this illusion to Selbstunähnlichkeit and utter meaninglessness, which indeed whose only option is to try real Kleist and Schiller, scabby, at least, unreasonable, greedy, slimy maybe, hinabzuzeihen to him.
THIS is not to tolerate.
You may inflate the cheeks, it may grant them every Idiotentort: At such a point, however, is one stop on offer.
I mean.
No one is forced to close in my opinion.
Does not matter: you is stronger than any rock.
- Advertisement -
"Every recognizing namely ushering a loss of their own imaginary holiness, eternity, uniqueness. That is to be careful not to see. "MG
This rate would then be: Every recognizing ushering a profit of their own holiness, eternity and uniqueness. If it must recognize or Einischt would be ...
One can argue about Beuys' art, but I agree with his statement that everyone is an artist, too. Everyone generates its world - holography his world - from scratch. This is in a sense the primary art. Some people add to the more expressive power, in which they, what is regarded commonly as an art practice. This also allows other people who are perhaps not so visionary, expressed to extend their projections, and refine. These arts - literature, visual arts, philosophy, science, art - you can not overestimate, but that does not change the fact that all people are equal and dibasic only be expressed in different ways.
"He provided so that the complementary image to god subjugated people: Everyone's giant thing! Everyone is a Titan! "MG
From my perspective, it would be nice if many people were aware of their power, because people are actually "Titans" or a "big deal". A man who knows his own importance - without comparisons and convictions - will certainly not submit to God, let alone a secular authority. He is the highest authority. Actually. Most people "want" but its not a "Titans"; not even "want". They want to live in a flock with one shepherd, who tells them where to go. And at night when they hear the gentle lowing of herd they are satisfied. But actually it does not matter what most people want. Because you can not change anything anyway. But in itself, anything is possible.
The Occult and the reincarnation
The people who remain in the herd are also the so-called Occult not want to understand. Actually, everything is clearly and not occult, but you have to see it yourself. This small effort could expect to "gifted". But the real question is, what is "gifted"? Are people who adhere to a belief, the Other interpret for them, really gifted or have only learned by heart and therefore had good grades?
As for reincarnation, so there is really big misunderstanding. If, like me, believes that EVERYTHING is now and that it is only now, a linear reincarnation is of course impossible. The many lives that we learn are all now, no matter whether they take place in the so-called past or the so-called future or equal in other dimensions. There are all aspects of the extended self that one is. So I think it is imperative to ally themselves with self, even to the various aspects - the various life - to know yourself and do not forget again and again by the death and the birth of his all.
It is not easy to understand himself as the supreme authority. But the immeasurable value individual is an essential part of a much-needed new enlightenment.
It is not here in the world.
You are here WHEN the world.
(You may double posted)
@ Lisa
"This sentence should read as follows: Each detecting ushering a profit of their own holiness, eternity and uniqueness. If it must recognize or Einischt would be ... "
Just like that. So I feel it.
"Here, you WHEN the world."
Yes. For all the squabble, which we have already given us ...
"That's why I think it is imperative to ally themselves with self ..."
That's it.
But I fear (not that erschröcklichte me) that your remarks to (re) incarnation few are like.
I answer just spontaneously, have not längers it rumgedacht, but no problems with it.
For others, however, I guess you're not a man but as friend Friedrich said so dynamite.
I look forward nonetheless rewarding to see there seems to be another one who brings almost all of the concept and mighty annoying.
You prepare me rare fun. (I mean seriously, without any ridicule. Well, a bit of mischief might be there.)
What you let go, is refreshing and Bible-guru free. Approval.
With you I might even potions for once water.
The spirit is supposed to hover over it (although I have, like many others, never believed).
And while we're talking so familiar: The best I laugh (although sometimes a drop of bitterness dareinmischt) for some time about the recurring accusation that I was too weak in faith.
Too weak in WHAT?
, Rug to be too weak?
Trantüte?
Eye Twisted clown?
Too weak-nots to prove that never appropriate bounty?
Waswas?
I laugh. That's good. Thank you.
This accusation of being "weak in faith" can only refer to beliefs that come from outside, so to speak, that is a sort of "foreign faith." Nevertheless, when one's faith - his own will, and this does not manifest, then this faith - these filters of perception - usually hampered by adverse thoughts, such as "I will," but "I do not want". This "I do not want" is back, the resistance step, picking what you want quasi again. The energy spills some extent on the spot.
Perhaps it is still important to know that what you want to achieve, even should be. In this way, you're in the frequency of the intended. So not only crystal clear focus is helpful, but also to behave as if what you had already happened. It adopts the belief. At first it feels strange, not as real as that which has hitherto been believed. But you have to get used to it, that there is no reality except that which is defined by those beliefs.
You do not take it too seriously the experienced reality. It is only a snapshot of countless chances ...
You can always get what you want ...
(Rolling Stones corrected)
You know this situation, too, but I always find it helpful to remember certain things. I write to be happy, because communication, such as here in the forum, is also communication with itself.
@ Lisa
If you come with your beliefs, it is easy for me a little dizzy ... But I like it, if I'm feeling a little overwhelmed.
From the bottom ago I agree with you, however, even though I still do not really get along well with your concept, to the effect that here "beliefs" would have to be addressed, which come from outside.
However, I am there still not so sure. Indeed, there are quite a few things that I want in any case, what the faith that I will get it, but I have given up as consistently as possible from my view good reasons to me.
Namely, it can be quite frustrativ (very mildly) when one believes around for years and is accompanied hoped for, it will not matter.
Then rather no longer believed. You can maintain quite certain goals. Maybe you can reach it anyway. But it does not hurt so when it dauerndzu not work.
Here, however, like coins, individual human dispositions seem very distinctive. I know quite people who seem to go very well with the faith. Me it seems like a dangerous, sweet slow poison.
Sometimes I envy such faith itself being too; what a meaningless outburst, because envy is crap anyway, of course, but in such a context beyond even idiotic. And against the undeniable obvious Dummsein I at least for me quite a lot.
So I try because with the faith contrast to settle, and the disappointed me, at least according to my judgments are not always that the next sentence I write rub, will result in a certain sense, and this is perhaps even more, with a good melody and rhythm of a some memorable elegance.
The advantage here is that I'm alone in my hand, to handle successfully with this belief sets. Because I am my own fortune.
To the residue, which regards the self-yet-so-feel: well.
Would Ask: Here we come, in my opinion in the vicinity of what I ("We the happiness") have just executed a "false happiness" in other strands. A very gefähliche thing.
But there may be children of the sun that can cope with it. I probably belong rather not do so.
Even at the close of your review: A certain amount of redundancy is essential in learning. In addition we will have to fight hard.
@ Lisa
I forgot even Beuys and the concept of art.
I mean, the man has dished out a shudder bullshit.
Not only does it in her imaginary, inflated Do not fired countless Tinker and weak Maten us to steal the last of the day, no, he devalued as the art of what it means socially sustainable as such.
For me, however not a thousandth Gran.
There is hardly anything Boshafteres, Zersetzerischeres to rise as each Krackler, Krattler and scribblers to the artist.
So every little greed, each scabby craving for carrot in the asshole in the Vienna U-Bahn is collected at the Marvel values.
Decadent it almost does not work. Anyway, I find it not easy to an increase.
Does the concept of art in past centuries have been often pulled too tight: THIS is a fatal mischief.
Quasi-putting Bach's violin concertos with the turnip in the asshole in one. Put some Dadaism a New York City € Sufferer with the Quixote in one. Rancid fat corners frescoes of great masters. Abartig. Disgusting. Cultural Totalabsturz.
I assume that you mean it again dear, but since you reap opposition and resistance to such an extent jens the end, as none yet looked.
Such egalitarianism, Verabsurdigung everything enhancing action, can not hope for the slightest form of toleration for me.
Somewhere, right there, even when the prongs is Beinaheallverzeihermagnus from all over.
Way to bring humanity to the lemurs.
(Addendum:. I will probably solve this comment yet out in the direction of a specific article The thing is always important enough.)
Greetings anyway.
(After all, you've got the best times annoyed me again. Respect.)