Sometimes it takes.
With the (albeit quite likely unaware) perfidious input I got here a few weeks ago, as in the question. To "Enlightened" Nietzsche, of which a spacing from the low end as a likely lediglicher "Borderline" was disqualified
All sorts of Jesuses and Sonstnochwasse were so "enlightened", Nietzsche but only a regrettable "borderline".
GIANT GRENADE SHIT CRAP!
The mere assertion shows where the thought and the will goes here.
There was special, the ES had seen; then hinwiederum others who had burned near that ES is: reason and natural.
If one compares the speeches, so nothing goes on beyond that Jesus (we also added Buddha, Mohammed, Abraham, etc. is anyway to mention) knew more of life than the other: on the contrary.
Wrong is wrong by repetition. Jesus was Nietzsche measured a talented apprentice, at best, never more.
And since Nietzsche, in full force, a dear was, he recognized him as such.
I'm running Christer on the bag.
People who raise a gifted apprentice to the Supreme to yourself feel good basked in its half capacity. There are fig and half.
The fact that they are then subject it to Mosaisten and Mohammedanisten, can not surprising: because their speech is only Half a Half.
Judaism and Islam are at least honest: ALL MINE!
So questionable, so moronic that may appear: Since you have decided, after all.
The Christian, however, is a miserable lout; he is stupid; it should be so and so basically correct, but then again somehow relative. He is the Potter services from among the three.
Even if he gets an idea of what sometimes happens that does not change. He may throw many bombs to help support there, but remains a mental castrato.
He creeps and slimes. This is his way.
There will be no re-emergence of Christianity more.
Any real resistance is pagan today.
You notice the.
- Advertisement -
Tags: Abrahamites , Christer
"He slimes and creeps. This is his way. "
Exactly!
John 14: 7 If you had known me you, you would know my Father also; and from henceforth ye know him and have seen him.
When he said that, since Jesus was a man of flesh and blood. To rise as the man himself to the highest deity means to Him, the spirit of wanting to do the same. But that was the reason because God hath cast him out of heaven, to put it in the language of the Bible.
Revelation 12: 9 And the great dragon was cast out, that old serpent, called the Devil, and Satan, which deceiveth the whole world: he was cast out into the earth, and his angels were with him.
And he betrays himself by saying:
John 3:13 No one has ascended into heaven except the one who descended from heaven, the Son of man which is in heaven.
No one does that otherwise have no way this can be gone except Jesus. And if this is true as I say, and I think it's true, then millions of people to the greatest deceiver fallen, the world has ever seen. And on the cross up and it all keeps the church this guy's nose and wants everyone to worship him instead of the God who is spirit who likes to wonder who will - not me! Because that's a perfect match, as he Inanna and bright and morning star, which is the evening star at the same time. Inanna is fallen from heaven and Earth Mother Goddess as it was taken over by the Babylonians and from Babylon who like it any wonder, since the Syrians came here. Yes, it checks for yourself, it's what I say. And even the beloved disciple of Jesus testified that when he writes:
John 1: 3 All things were made by him; and without Him nothing came of what has occurred.
The fallen out of the sky image is to be worshiped at the request of Jesus and in the future - see Revelation 2: 1-5 - and this fallen from the sky image whose sex can not be uniquely determined because this creature once as a male ( devil in human form) and another time as female (the old serpent) occurs, is Satan.
The suffering of Jesus on the cross is in the Bible:
Isaiah 53: 8 As a result of oppression and judgment he was taken away; but who wants His generation? ...
Yes, why can probably be unable to determine sex?
Inanna - Satan - Snake - Jesus ...... .he makes use of many names!
It is time for all to really proclaim the truth.
Still on the topic:
Revelation 2: 6 But this thou hast, that thou hatest the deeds of the Nicolaitans, which I also hate.
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nikolait
"... Beyond reproach" idol-sacrifices to eat and to commit fornication "..."
How does that fits you please with what is in the first creation story of the Bible?
1.Mose 1: 27-28 And God created man in his own image, in the image of God he created him; (male and female W.) male and female he created them. And God blessed them, and God said unto them, Be fruitful, and multiply, and replenish the earth and subdue it; ...
God gave his people ALL freedoms and blessed them.
In Eden, however, there were from the beginning bans! Man must do this and that man must leave that. From this vast law books have developed even into our days. Not Yet once again the lawyers know all the laws.
How should because people can multiply when they do not even know if they are naked or not - see second creation story of the Bible. That can only mean one thing, namely that the two creation stories in the Bible are really two independent creation stories.
"Then it says in the above link yet," Since this group is practically nothing else is known, the allegations are speculative ".
So everything is becoming twisted, the good ones are taken to the evil and vice versa.
@ Hans (mech)
You change your pseudonyms yes more often than I hoses under the ...; o)
Ps. Those who are serious things says, with "... subdue .." are dotted, all but does not guarantee the source of all being and life. Because this would never deny the principle of equality of all individuals divine! Throw but the monotheistic trashy books finally Bible ... in the bin.
@ Hans & Dude (both now monosyllabic)
First, Dude: Hansen's Bible addiction is serious indeed; nevertheless he wrests this book but always something new. This is important, more than most assets.
Perhaps reading this so many only because of its biblical quotations?
So be it.
Your "skill" in any case has nothing to more attractive; it is an easy trick to see the world as wicked to their desired end to exculpate the same.
And, "Hans," I will recommend you not spare Bible. This would help very likely to mention that you probably already not successfully test my advice (I also did not want you to hochnähmest another book, as you it with this're doing), by no means, transmission in "case of success" only the devil with the Beelzebuben from.
What do I have to be stated with you both - we're talking about plain language, right? - Is a believer addiction.
This is partly to look sad.
Two gifted formed; and what they do with their complex thoughts?
You squeeze into a believer addiction.
A Gelobsucht.
Lisa, who no longer persuaded us some time, did as well bookmarks that all turned away, also Noble, desfalls most women, the same thing.
Please forgive me, wofern going that I take myself on my side, even to say what I think.
(Personal info: There grab here only because so few one, because the rest does not dare One has at least a little German can to assist valid here, not the same on the front steps of the Gottessuchertums to fall..)
Best wishes to you both.
Yes, I wrote that Nietzsche was a "border liner", a frontier of enlightenment. He has crossed that line often, but in my opinion was not enlightened chronic. Given his intellectual, scientific personality was too strong. But who can really know another person ...
I completely share your opinion that Christianity is a "Kriecherreligion". That is the nature of the case and applies to all institutionalized religions. Wherever Dogmata be established, to which one is to believe the foundation is a big lie. Would not it the truth, it would take no dogmas and no penalties. The truth always speaks for itself.
"Any real resistance is today pagan." MG
Beautiful set, but you do not need to exhaust itself in the resistance, pagan or not. Focus on what you are completely enough.
Perhaps an interesting article to Christianity:
http://derhonigmannsagt.wordpress.com/2012/12/08/christentum-ist-judentum-fur-nichtjuden-oder-das-erbe-sauls/
@ Lisa
I do not know who, as you put it, the more "enlightened chronic" was.
For me, who can the concept of Erleuchtetseins anyway not assign (and it would be the same if I could), it plays no significant role, whether, when, how Nietzsche was enlightened or not.
He squats yes from me and trying to get me to salvation to grin. (Yes, this is now expressed somewhat rustic, but the wire I have just as well.)
But he has just written better books than pretty much the more or less enlightened rest.
That's what matters to me; after all, I have somewhat learned to read.
It does not give a damn (the Spaniard said "ni un pimiento") to suggest or even to know that somewhere once herumlatschte an enlightened one, when the more or less just let go of platitudes me.
I'd rather have one that was perhaps almost as stupid as me, has me but something to say.
"Besides, it is intellectual, scientific personality was too strong."
Well, even revealing, said.
You like it have already guessed: I had a choice between enlightenment (whatever that means also, let's say, as you see fit) and continuous intellectual, scientific development, so I am certainly were deciding for the latter.
"Enlightenment" I feel it is not only to be something pretty boring; it acts as a kind of death in life, zombie way.
Why would I still limp around, if I already know everything?
And: If I were enlightened, so I would certainly have an even unerträglicherer father, an even coarser nuisance towards my sons, as it already has.
I guess that you'll love this talk seriously not much.
Since I can not make much of it.
But I like you anyway, if only because you're defiant and stubborn and yet eloquent.
If Erleuchtetsein looks like I can stand quite well.
Come together where woman, impudence, intellect and eloquence, that I will anyway fairly quickly awesome.
That may be grossly negligent, but I will not even change it.
Any nonsense you have to afford yes.
Along it you can at least potentially recognize when one has made any times.
"You may have it already suspected: If I had the choice between enlightenment (whatever that was always, let's say, as you see fit) and continuous intellectual, scientific development, so I am certainly were deciding for the latter." MG
That is the crux! Enlightenment includes a rapid development in any way, without any side effects. A steady - slow - intellectual and scientific development, however, does not include enlightenment and has many unpleasant side effects.
Moreover enlightenment - that deep knowledge - anything but boring. But ultimately, enlightenment or no enlightenment only one choice ...
@ Lisa
But you also see - almost - everything.
In fact, "Continuous" was not the right word.
Sometimes I hew me to the turnip, sometimes they do not rübt into pulp.
If you can even give me half a day enlightenment (I you were a beer for off), I might try it out.
Perhaps that is indeed not so bleak as I thought.
But I am afraid that you can not so easily without prejudice comes out there again after half a day.
I write what grade - more or less - to summarize alsomit probably later again after.
First of all - again, as in the other strand - a big thank you for the joy you give me prepare.
(In my mind I can see how she imagined how they hang their mouths, drooling ... Yes, sometimes I enjoy and malicious thoughts ... Hehe ...)
Man, I'm glad that I'm officially erdunkelt recently. My current identification document is the last, is imprinted in the RK.
Enlightenment is overrated. Who then would need energy saving lamps?