"You can not be servant of two masters."
Also I hear this strange saying again and think again, although I understand the usual assumable imagery that one the best so many masters used to be not a single servant more.
Since when I am servant?
I want to be a gentleman servant?
Or he prefers the two or three or more to get in the best servant status depending on development?
What about the military?
Since I went today to serve the same does not go there, would probably never have been my special case, but today only not quite.
I would know, my neck while serving risking, not even as accurate for what the Lord and whose thing.
The more one is a good thing, better more to the less one is a servant.
Weis is not enough to actually gentlemen, is it therefore not a servant.
- Ads -
Tags: master and servant
I serve God, Father, Mother, my self, and each divine person; and completely voluntary.
The unfortunate thing is that this will serve nowadays considered generally as an attack.
@ Dude
"I serve God, Father, Mother, my self, and each divine person; and completely voluntary. "
To serve themselves by serving God, is not a shame, because:
"All things were made by him; and without Him nothing came of that was made "(John 1: 3).
Therefore Jesus also said:
1 John 4:20 If a man say, I love God, and hates his brother but, he is a liar; because who does not love his brother whom he has seen, can not love, he does not see God!
1 John 4:21 And this commandment have we from him, That he who loveth God should love his brother also.
Magnus says: "I want to be a gentleman servant?"
Magnus has NOT understand! - Still not, alas!
1 John 2:10 He that loveth his brother abideth in the light, and nothing inappropriate is to him;
As for me, I like the very Magnus and the "Dude", which I also like - although it's not like likes me.
LG
haschmech
"... And the" Dude ", which I also like - although it's not like likes me."
Since you are mistaken. I like honest you. What I do not like so, is your obsession with the Bible.
LG also:-)
Even the not-yet-Chancellor serves the people by example. He talks now for a glass of water.
http://rundertischdgf.wordpress.com/2012/11/25/das-honorar-fur-den-mochtegernkanzler-steinbruck-ist-jetzt-nur-noch-ein-glas-wasser/
@ Rundertischdgf
So you will be fattened by the Bilderbergers hiking to a speaker who preaches all over the country and serves for water, only to be probably the But Not Registrar.
He is so or so, must play its part serving over, especially since he has the misfortune to physically act fairly healthy.
@ Haschmech
I want you even tell a true story from serving, and of the Bible.
I had lost my way with very heavy backpacks and even too little water in August in Extremadura, and it was a normal day dawned, perhaps promised more than 37 degrees in the shade, of which but on the way to wet no I would accompany bit, and I tried to throw off ballast.
I was on business trip poet and therefore had two or three books in the luggage. However, the Bible was the hardest and most easily dispensable. I hid under some rocks near a small bridge over a dry Flüßchenbette and blessed them there.
One and a half pounds less, which can be beneficial if you zutzelt already from the last street puddle by the asphalt streaks.
Anyway hurt the decision of the expedition not, because at the end of the day, probably about seven, I reached the most beautiful Spanish hamlet I ever respected.
For there was an inn that without remedy me my bag for zackzack successively so much jugs of water, then beer, then taught cup of wine that I so gestärkiget felt after two hours, my way, good water bottle and a bottle of blessed still continue two hours until I, on a beautiful, quiet place, yet found a wonderful night.
It was a pity, because it was a pretty neat, not fully umgehunzte Luther Bible edition; but a Bible you get nachgeworfen in Extremadura, while Colli-Montinari edition of Zarathustra me maybe two weeks at most within reach postlagernd could have been sent from a buddy.
In survival situations you have to think practically. If you want to survive, one must indeed consider what still needs one behind first.
You would do it maybe really good times when you einlegtest some Bible holidays.
(Incidentally, I have another After I long only a pretty little English, bound in red leather had -. Somehow currently or permanently lost - I got at a flea market about two Euros a very nice edition, but I know why I read very rarely is.. Some verses are good for satire. Sometimes is necessary to consider whether a from another specified verse is true or even what around it is. Also, I get so much here Sunday School from you that I the text anyway from memory can in two to three incarnations will .)
@ Dude
Not intended by me, because I also "the" Men had to mention in connection with serving and servant of sliding back toward the Divine / God.
I wanted to draw the focus on just those things that you voluntarily and specifically used because they are considered beneficial and therefore worthy of support.
Concrete things.
So: what, for whom, what really I place myself in the service of a considered by me as a useful thing?
But also: Where, when there is the need of the often severe service, namely to lead?
Haschmechs Bible verses lead me there is currently no iota more.
(That reminds me of one that I had announced a Nachvollchaosszenarienbetrachtung. Can maybe even some time in coming, may be, the time is not yet ripe.)
@ Dude and @ Magnus
"Since you are mistaken."
Well Dude, there are cases when I'm wrong a lot.
Now to Magnus:
"Incidentally, I have another."
Beautiful!
"Sometimes is necessary to consider whether a verse from another specified true or even what is around it. "
The purpose HALLOWS really is the agent or the agent aka the center of it all - the Word of God.
"Concrete things.
So: what, for whom, what really I place myself in the service of a considered by me as a useful thing?
But also: Where, when there is the need of the often severe service, namely to lead "?
Answer to the first question: First of all I'd say you're doing it for your two sons. For your two sons are your future. Because I take so times that you do not have the intention to "go" after them. In the second place, then you're doing it for yourself, for those of you deem useful things are your way through your current life. Your life and the lives of your sons was given to you by the Creator; the lives of your sons came into the world through one man woman, whom thou hast learned what love is. But Love is God and God is Spirit and God is also justice, which is why it is in you already in it, because God is your Creator, that you love to place yourself in the service of one of you deem useful thing for your sons, which your future in the world are here.
Answer to the second question: The necessity of often severe service is virtually everywhere and always, as long as you live on earth your current life, which you have not at all intend to live for you alone and that makes you a very sympathetic people that you have to like to have simple.
LG