I have not met a few, including myself, who swore, they considered themselves very good advisers, but not suitable to clothe himself an arbiter items with high responsibility.
(I have at least ever said that I was ready to lead the Ministry of Education for a while. Again I did not trust me so far too.)
No doubt there are natures that are stronger in the analysis as in the development of concepts, as in deciding and Vornehinstehen.
We must nevertheless ask the question of cowardice.
The consultant is ultimately never really to blame when something goes wrong, but can pat yourself on the chest when he has fallen low.
He can even say that the real decision-makers not sufficient on its restrictive warnings heard eingschlagen the counseling is way to zag, not sensitive enough to react in such and such situation, the prevailing situation have just not shown grown.
Conversely, the decision maker may never failed to point out the and the consultant has so and so ill-advised him; They will say that he was quite incompetent when he'll get the wrong consultant or listen to bad advice, had followed such.
In almost reversal of the adage "The little one hangs, the Great allowed to run" can here the little one, the consultant (not the decision but remains makers and kick him out or worse) steal away with all kinds of excuses, while the Great, the decision maker, is sacked.
You should ask to what extent a consultant is to be trusted, who has never portrayed himself forward therefore essential.
First, you have to doubt how loyal he was actually; secondly, the likelihood is great that he assess the specific requirements that situationally as a whole would be a decision maker, not from personal experience, herewith can not be a competent consultant.
Shortened, coarse said: You should carefully consider the extent to which you can hear on consultants who have no ass in the pants themselves.
In addition, the so cowardly consultant, thereat envy controlled, one might, consciously or unconsciously, for bad advice to learn the satisfaction of the fittest stumble or even fall to see.
Furthermore, like the avoidant consultant his unfulfilled lust for power to enter such in the decider, possibly without any ill will that this so fired up, coats, overestimated himself, his forces not dividing properly.
I've in any case done to these criteria to examine my advisors back in the future in more detail and to see my hand very close attention to when I state that I am here or there is not likely to take the first place, but I own just fine, much better than the consultant who had to do that.
- Advertisement -
Tags: decision-makers
@ Magnus
Here at you it comes to education, because I'm dead right.
"I have at least ever said that I was ready to lead the Ministry of Education for a while."
That's good to know, may be I'll come back in a trice it.
http://haschmech.wordpress.com/2012/11/16/raus-aus-dem-teufelskreis-der-finsternis-hinein-ins-licht-der-menschlichen-intelligenz/
Greetings to all from here
Josef
Yes, it is the courage to be a decision maker is missing. Because the media sheep sheep herd so so can incite that understand that to err is human and Klugkeit often arises from mistakes, can go completely lost. Therefore, only those in power who do not have the courage to swim against the current. The fact that but everything goes to the dogs ... well. Our political system is a negative selection system. Hopefully I can do my part to change that.
A consultant should always be to the best of my knowledge and belief give advice, and he needs to be clear about from vorherein that he must share responsibility, and can not pass anything on the decision maker when its Obeyed by the decision Council has a handle in the toilet ...
If consultants are basically useless, and often even dangerous.
Now, if the decision maker but against the advice of the consultant acts (to the best of its knowledge and belief), meets the consultant no consequence if the decision greifft the toilet.
Because the consultant must the final decision of the arbiter always accept, he wanted to decide for themselves and not "only" advise.
He should make in the latter case, however, as a consequence of voluntary self worrying about whether his advice was defective, or if there is potential for improvement ...
And speaking consultants ...
haschmech
Get Help.
@ Dude
"Get Help."
Dear Dude,
rheinländisch in my native language, because you're especially death (= Dude). The only one who could so use good help here, you are.
If I were you, I'd really make another pseudonym. Your present makes you so pale.
Compared to what you say, I like what Thomas says, a hundred times better:
"... That to err is human and Klugkeit often arises from mistakes ..."
This fits very well with my latest articles:
http://haschmech.wordpress.com/2012/11/19/supratendenz-a-what-nu-ja-a-supra-trend eben/
haschmech
"Compared to what you say, I like what Thomas says, a hundred times better"
Nice for you. Now I must tell you that what you give so lately from you, for me nothing more than become fanatical bible babble.
I find that quite frankly very sad, I'm still here your comments always appreciated. Now I read and certainly not more tangled Geseier.
So one last loving intentioned advice. Throw Sagan and the Bible away and come back.
@ Haschmech
I'll be at your Geschwurbel also no longer with and also find it somewhat disgusting, the Dude still in such a way to make his pitch down.
It is already tolerated; but what you verströmst there is no positive energy.
Dude is you always entegengetreten very open, so I can be hard to understand why you now, in your religious Broken Scratch awareness, this directory holst death.
If that was a joke, he is certainly not very successful.
I know better.
President Herzog stood on the Great Wall and spoke of the Christian-abendländschen understanding of the world Läufte how they should run well in China, and the Chines' commented dryly: ". The Bible does not apply in China"
Although this is not China, but also not Stan Abraham, or Moses or Jesus-Stan or St. John or Mohammed Stan.
I ask you to remember that.
Magnus
Oh, this Degoutanz is still tame compared to what else I encountered so.
Funnily enough, he has currently only half wrong with the mention of death, because it does have absolutely nothing to do with the name, but right now I come before me like death, but mainly lies in the whole madness in the world ...
The thread of patience is believable demolished.
Ken Thomas in 'clip in the other strand can already hardly dominate whether the loopy Bull hits being played on the world ...
I'm ... really a bit further than Ken ...
In view of the whole blood of innocents, all fucked children, dispossessed, displaced from their homes, families, the more stubborn focus the world on the money, the systematic propaganda and agitation, all the war promises and drones-killer-games, etc. It is also damn hard not completely going crazy ...
... There is a small personal attack - and may he be ever so violently, which was by no means yes haschmechs - ridiculous Pippifax other hand ...
I am irrelevant ...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C_dBrFyWxXo
@ Dude
For the video, I have not had time.
But I beg you not even here einzutun haschmechschen sunsets.
Permanent whining is härtestens punished here.
Namely, if there is no relevant law seems broken, definitely still unlocked, but as You already haschmech total ankündigtest, perhaps only answered laconically or not.
This blog is no mourning and crash municipality.
Will you hear my latest whining?
I meet only the TTTTTTTTTTTT button.
Bissell is a stupid, huh?